ethics research proposal example

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples

Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples

Published on October 18, 2021 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on May 9, 2024.

Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. Scientists and researchers must always adhere to a certain code of conduct when collecting data from people.

The goals of human research often include understanding real-life phenomena, studying effective treatments, investigating behaviors, and improving lives in other ways. What you decide to research and how you conduct that research involve key ethical considerations.

These considerations work to

• protect the rights of research participants
• enhance research validity
• maintain scientific or academic integrity

Table of contents

Why do research ethics matter, getting ethical approval for your study, types of ethical issues, voluntary participation, informed consent, confidentiality, potential for harm, results communication, examples of ethical failures, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research ethics.

Research ethics matter for scientific integrity, human rights and dignity, and collaboration between science and society. These principles make sure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and safe for research subjects.

You’ll balance pursuing important research objectives with using ethical research methods and procedures. It’s always necessary to prevent permanent or excessive harm to participants, whether inadvertent or not.

Defying research ethics will also lower the credibility of your research because it’s hard for others to trust your data if your methods are morally questionable.

Even if a research idea is valuable to society, it doesn’t justify violating the human rights or dignity of your study participants.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Before you start any study involving data collection with people, you’ll submit your research proposal to an institutional review board (IRB) .

An IRB is a committee that checks whether your research aims and research design are ethically acceptable and follow your institution’s code of conduct. They check that your research materials and procedures are up to code.

If successful, you’ll receive IRB approval, and you can begin collecting data according to the approved procedures. If you want to make any changes to your procedures or materials, you’ll need to submit a modification application to the IRB for approval.

If unsuccessful, you may be asked to re-submit with modifications or your research proposal may receive a rejection. To get IRB approval, it’s important to explicitly note how you’ll tackle each of the ethical issues that may arise in your study.

There are several ethical issues you should always pay attention to in your research design, and these issues can overlap with each other.

You’ll usually outline ways you’ll deal with each issue in your research proposal if you plan to collect data from participants.

Voluntary participation means that all research subjects are free to choose to participate without any pressure or coercion.

All participants are able to withdraw from, or leave, the study at any point without feeling an obligation to continue. Your participants don’t need to provide a reason for leaving the study.

It’s important to make it clear to participants that there are no negative consequences or repercussions to their refusal to participate. After all, they’re taking the time to help you in the research process , so you should respect their decisions without trying to change their minds.

Voluntary participation is an ethical principle protected by international law and many scientific codes of conduct.

Take special care to ensure there’s no pressure on participants when you’re working with vulnerable groups of people who may find it hard to stop the study even when they want to.

Informed consent refers to a situation in which all potential participants receive and understand all the information they need to decide whether they want to participate. This includes information about the study’s benefits, risks, funding, and institutional approval.

You make sure to provide all potential participants with all the relevant information about

• what the study is about
• the risks and benefits of taking part
• how long the study will take
• your supervisor’s contact information and the institution’s approval number

Usually, you’ll provide participants with a text for them to read and ask them if they have any questions. If they agree to participate, they can sign or initial the consent form. Note that this may not be sufficient for informed consent when you work with particularly vulnerable groups of people.

If you’re collecting data from people with low literacy, make sure to verbally explain the consent form to them before they agree to participate.

For participants with very limited English proficiency, you should always translate the study materials or work with an interpreter so they have all the information in their first language.

In research with children, you’ll often need informed permission for their participation from their parents or guardians. Although children cannot give informed consent, it’s best to also ask for their assent (agreement) to participate, depending on their age and maturity level.

Anonymity means that you don’t know who the participants are and you can’t link any individual participant to their data.

You can only guarantee anonymity by not collecting any personally identifying information—for example, names, phone numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, physical characteristics, photos, and videos.

In many cases, it may be impossible to truly anonymize data collection . For example, data collected in person or by phone cannot be considered fully anonymous because some personal identifiers (demographic information or phone numbers) are impossible to hide.

You’ll also need to collect some identifying information if you give your participants the option to withdraw their data at a later stage.

Data pseudonymization is an alternative method where you replace identifying information about participants with pseudonymous, or fake, identifiers. The data can still be linked to participants but it’s harder to do so because you separate personal information from the study data.

Confidentiality means that you know who the participants are, but you remove all identifying information from your report.

All participants have a right to privacy, so you should protect their personal data for as long as you store or use it. Even when you can’t collect data anonymously, you should secure confidentiality whenever you can.

Some research designs aren’t conducive to confidentiality, but it’s important to make all attempts and inform participants of the risks involved.

As a researcher, you have to consider all possible sources of harm to participants. Harm can come in many different forms.

• Psychological harm: Sensitive questions or tasks may trigger negative emotions such as shame or anxiety.
• Social harm: Participation can involve social risks, public embarrassment, or stigma.
• Physical harm: Pain or injury can result from the study procedures.
• Legal harm: Reporting sensitive data could lead to legal risks or a breach of privacy.

It’s best to consider every possible source of harm in your study as well as concrete ways to mitigate them. Involve your supervisor to discuss steps for harm reduction.

Make sure to disclose all possible risks of harm to participants before the study to get informed consent. If there is a risk of harm, prepare to provide participants with resources or counseling or medical services if needed.

Some of these questions may bring up negative emotions, so you inform participants about the sensitive nature of the survey and assure them that their responses will be confidential.

The way you communicate your research results can sometimes involve ethical issues. Good science communication is honest, reliable, and credible. It’s best to make your results as transparent as possible.

Take steps to actively avoid plagiarism and research misconduct wherever possible.

Plagiarism means submitting others’ works as your own. Although it can be unintentional, copying someone else’s work without proper credit amounts to stealing. It’s an ethical problem in research communication because you may benefit by harming other researchers.

Self-plagiarism is when you republish or re-submit parts of your own papers or reports without properly citing your original work.

This is problematic because you may benefit from presenting your ideas as new and original even though they’ve already been published elsewhere in the past. You may also be infringing on your previous publisher’s copyright, violating an ethical code, or wasting time and resources by doing so.

In extreme cases of self-plagiarism, entire datasets or papers are sometimes duplicated. These are major ethical violations because they can skew research findings if taken as original data.

You notice that two published studies have similar characteristics even though they are from different years. Their sample sizes, locations, treatments, and results are highly similar, and the studies share one author in common.

Research misconduct

Research misconduct means making up or falsifying data, manipulating data analyses, or misrepresenting results in research reports. It’s a form of academic fraud.

These actions are committed intentionally and can have serious consequences; research misconduct is not a simple mistake or a point of disagreement about data analyses.

Research misconduct is a serious ethical issue because it can undermine academic integrity and institutional credibility. It leads to a waste of funding and resources that could have been used for alternative research.

Later investigations revealed that they fabricated and manipulated their data to show a nonexistent link between vaccines and autism. Wakefield also neglected to disclose important conflicts of interest, and his medical license was taken away.

This fraudulent work sparked vaccine hesitancy among parents and caregivers. The rate of MMR vaccinations in children fell sharply, and measles outbreaks became more common due to a lack of herd immunity.

Research scandals with ethical failures are littered throughout history, but some took place not that long ago.

Some scientists in positions of power have historically mistreated or even abused research participants to investigate research problems at any cost. These participants were prisoners, under their care, or otherwise trusted them to treat them with dignity.

To demonstrate the importance of research ethics, we’ll briefly review two research studies that violated human rights in modern history.

These experiments were inhumane and resulted in trauma, permanent disabilities, or death in many cases.

After some Nazi doctors were put on trial for their crimes, the Nuremberg Code of research ethics for human experimentation was developed in 1947 to establish a new standard for human experimentation in medical research.

In reality, the actual goal was to study the effects of the disease when left untreated, and the researchers never informed participants about their diagnoses or the research aims.

Although participants experienced severe health problems, including blindness and other complications, the researchers only pretended to provide medical care.

When treatment became possible in 1943, 11 years after the study began, none of the participants were offered it, despite their health conditions and high risk of death.

Ethical failures like these resulted in severe harm to participants, wasted resources, and lower trust in science and scientists. This is why all research institutions have strict ethical guidelines for performing research.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Measures of central tendency
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Thematic analysis
• Cohort study
• Peer review
• Ethnography

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Conformity bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Availability heuristic
• Attrition bias
• Social desirability bias

Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. These principles include voluntary participation, informed consent, anonymity, confidentiality, potential for harm, and results communication.

Scientists and researchers must always adhere to a certain code of conduct when collecting data from others .

These considerations protect the rights of research participants, enhance research validity , and maintain scientific integrity.

Research ethics matter for scientific integrity, human rights and dignity, and collaboration between science and society. These principles make sure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and safe.

Anonymity means you don’t know who the participants are, while confidentiality means you know who they are but remove identifying information from your research report. Both are important ethical considerations .

You can only guarantee anonymity by not collecting any personally identifying information—for example, names, phone numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, physical characteristics, photos, or videos.

You can keep data confidential by using aggregate information in your research report, so that you only refer to groups of participants rather than individuals.

These actions are committed intentionally and can have serious consequences; research misconduct is not a simple mistake or a point of disagreement but a serious ethical failure.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2024, May 09). Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 7, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-ethics/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, data collection | definition, methods & examples, what is self-plagiarism | definition & how to avoid it, how to avoid plagiarism | tips on citing sources, what is your plagiarism score.

• The Open University
• Accessibility hub
• Guest user / Sign out
• Study with The Open University

My OpenLearn Profile

Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite content and get recognition for your learning

Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal

This article explores the ethical issues that may arise in your proposed study during your doctoral research degree.

What ethical principles apply when planning and conducting research?

Research ethics are the moral principles that govern how researchers conduct their studies (Wellcome Trust, 2014). As there are elements of uncertainty and risk involved in any study, every researcher has to consider how they can uphold these ethical principles and conduct the research in a way that protects the interests and welfare of participants and other stakeholders (such as organisations).  

You will need to consider the ethical issues that might arise in your proposed study. Consideration of the fundamental ethical principles that underpin all research will help you to identify the key issues and how these could be addressed. As you are probably a practitioner who wants to undertake research within your workplace, consider how your role as an ‘insider’ influences how you will conduct your study. Think about the ethical issues that might arise when you become an insider researcher (for example, relating to trust, confidentiality and anonymity).  

What key ethical principles do you think will be important when planning or conducting your research, particularly as an insider? Principles that come to mind might include autonomy, respect, dignity, privacy, informed consent and confidentiality. You may also have identified principles such as competence, integrity, wellbeing, justice and non-discrimination.  

Key ethical issues that you will address as an insider researcher include:

• Gaining trust
• Avoiding coercion when recruiting colleagues or other participants (such as students or service users)
• Practical challenges relating to ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of organisations and staff or other participants.

(Heslop et al, 2018)

A fuller discussion of ethical principles is available from the British Psychological Society’s Code of Human Research Ethics (BPS, 2021).

You can also refer to guidance from the British Educational Research Association and the British Association for Applied Linguistics .

Ethical principles are essential for protecting the interests of research participants, including maximising the benefits and minimising any risks associated with taking part in a study. These principles describe ethical conduct which reflects the integrity of the researcher, promotes the wellbeing of participants and ensures high-quality research is conducted (Health Research Authority, 2022).  

Research ethics is therefore not simply about gaining ethical approval for your study to be conducted. Research ethics relates to your moral conduct as a doctoral researcher and will apply throughout your study from design to dissemination (British Psychological Society, 2021). When you apply to undertake a doctorate, you will need to clearly indicate in your proposal that you understand these ethical principles and are committed to upholding them.  

Where can I find ethical guidance and resources? 

Professional bodies, learned societies, health and social care authorities, academic publications, Research Ethics Committees and research organisations provide a range of ethical guidance and resources. International codes such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights underpin ethical frameworks (United Nations, 1948).  

You may be aware of key legislation in your own country or the country where you plan to undertake the research, including laws relating to consent, data protection and decision-making capacity, for example, the Data Protection Act, 2018 (UK).  If you want to find out more about becoming an ethical researcher, check out this Open University short course: Becoming an ethical researcher: Introduction and guidance: What is a badged course? - OpenLearn - Open University  

You should be able to justify the research decisions you make. Utilising these resources will guide your ethical judgements when writing your proposal and ultimately when designing and conducting your research study. The Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (British Educational Research Association, 2018) identifies the key responsibilities you will have when you conduct your research, including the range of stakeholders that you will have responsibilities to, as follows:   

• to your participants (e.g. to appropriately inform them, facilitate their participation and support them)
• clients, stakeholders and sponsors
• the community of educational or health and social care researchers
• for publication and dissemination
• your wellbeing and development

The National Institute for Health and Care Research (no date) has emphasised the need to promote equality, diversity and inclusion when undertaking research, particularly to address long-standing social and health inequalities. Research should be informed by the diversity of people’s experiences and insights, so that it will lead to the development of practice that addresses genuine need. A commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion aims to eradicate prejudice and discrimination on the basis of an individual or group of individuals' protected characteristics such as sex (gender), disability, race, sexual orientation, in line with the Equality Act 2010.  

The NIHR has produced guidance for enhancing the inclusion of ‘under-served groups’ when designing a research study (2020). Although the guidance refers to clinical research it is relevant to research more broadly.  

You should consider how you will promote equality and diversity in your planned study, including through aspects such as your research topic or question, the methodology you will use, the participants you plan to recruit and how you will analyse and interpret your data.    

What ethical issues do I need to consider when writing my research proposal?

You might be planning to undertake research in a health, social care, educational or other setting, including observations and interviews. The following prompts should help you to identify key ethical issues that you need to bear in mind when undertaking research in such settings.  

1.     Imagine you are a potential participant. Think about the questions and concerns that you might have:

• How would you feel if a researcher sat in your space and took notes, completed a checklist, or made an audio or film recording?
• What harm might a researcher cause by observing or interviewing you and others?
• What would you want to know about the researcher and ask them about the study before giving consent?
• When imagining you are the participant, how could the researcher make you feel more comfortable to be observed or interviewed? 

2.     Having considered the perspective of your potential participant, how would you take account of concerns such as privacy, consent, wellbeing and power in your research proposal?  

[Adapted from OpenLearn course: Becoming an ethical researcher, Week 2 Activity 3: Becoming an ethical researcher - OpenLearn - Open University ]  

The ethical issues to be considered will vary depending on your organisational context/role, the types of participants you plan to recruit (for example, children, adults with mental health problems), the research methods you will use, and the types of data you will collect. You will need to decide how to recruit your participants so you do not inappropriately exclude anyone.  Consider what methods may be necessary to facilitate their voice and how you can obtain their consent to taking part or ensure that consent is obtained from someone else as necessary, for example, a parent in the case of a child. 

You should also think about how to avoid imposing an unnecessary burden or costs on your participants. For example, by minimising the length of time they will have to commit to the study and by providing travel or other expenses. Identify the measures that you will take to store your participants’ data safely and maintain their confidentiality and anonymity when you report your findings. You could do this by storing interview and video recordings in a secure server and anonymising their names and those of their organisations using pseudonyms.  

Professional codes such as the Code of Human Research Ethics (BPS, 2021) provide guidance on undertaking research with children. Being an ‘insider’ researching within your own organisation has advantages. However, you should also consider how this might impact on your research, such as power dynamics, consent, potential bias and any conflict of interest between your professional and researcher roles (Sapiro and Matthews, 2020).  

How have other researchers addressed any ethical challenges?

The literature provides researchers’ accounts explaining how they addressed ethical challenges when undertaking studies. For example, Turcotte-Tremblay and McSween-Cadieux (2018) discuss strategies for protecting participants’ confidentiality when disseminating findings locally, such as undertaking fieldwork in multiple sites and providing findings in a generalised form. In addition, professional guidance includes case studies illustrating how ethical issues can be addressed, including when researching online forums (British Sociological Association, no date).

Watch the videos below and consider what insights the postgraduate researcher and supervisor provide  regarding issues such as being an ‘insider researcher’, power relations, avoiding intrusion, maintaining participant anonymity and complying with research ethics and professional standards. How might their experiences inform the design and conduct of your own study?

Postgraduate researcher and supervisor talk about ethical considerations

Your thoughtful consideration of the ethical issues that might arise and how you would address these should enable you to propose an ethically informed study and conduct it in a responsible, fair and sensitive manner. 

British Educational Research Association (2018)  Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.  Available at:  https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

British Psychological Society (2021)  Code of Human Research Ethics . Available at:  https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics%20%281%29.pdf  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

British Sociological Association (2016)  Researching online forums . Available at:  https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24834/j000208_researching_online_forums_-cs1-_v3.pdf  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Health Research Authority (2022)  UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research . Available at:  https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/uk-policy-framework-health-social-care-research/uk-policy-framework-health-and-social-care-research/#chiefinvestigators  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Heslop, C., Burns, S., Lobo, R. (2018) ‘Managing qualitative research as insider-research in small rural communities’,  Rural and Remote Health , 18: pp. 4576.

Equality Act 2010, c. 15.  Available at:   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/introduction   (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

National Institute for Health and Care Research (no date)  Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) . Available at:  https://arc-kss.nihr.ac.uk/public-and-community-involvement/pcie-guide/how-to-do-pcie/equality-diversity-and-inclusion-edi  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

National Institute for Health and Care Research (2020)  Improving inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research: Guidance from INCLUDE project.  Available at:   https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/improving-inclusion-of-under-served-groups-in-clinical-research-guidance-from-include-project/25435  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Sapiro, B. and Matthews, E. (2020) ‘Both Insider and Outsider. On Conducting Social Work Research in Mental Health Settings’,  Advances in Social Work , 20(3). Available at:  https://doi.org/10.18060/23926

Turcotte-Tremblay, A. and McSween-Cadieux, E. (2018) ‘A reflection on the challenge of protecting confidentiality of participants when disseminating research results locally’,  BMC Medical Ethics,  19(supplement 1), no. 45. Available at:   https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-018-0279-0

United Nations General Assembly (1948)  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights . Resolution A/RES/217/A. Available at:  https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights#:~:text=Drafted%20by%20representatives%20with%20different,all%20peoples%20and%20all%20nations . (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Wellcome Trust (2014)  Ensuring your research is ethical: A guide for Extended Project Qualification students . Available at:  https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wtp057673_0.pdf  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

More articles from the research proposal collection

Writing your research proposal

A doctoral research degree is the highest academic qualification that a student can achieve. The guidance provided in these articles will help you apply for one of the two main types of research degree offered by The Open University.

Level: 1 Introductory

Defining your research methodology

Your research methodology is the approach you will take to guide your research process and explain why you use particular methods. This article explains more.

Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview

The final article looks at writing your research proposal - from the introduction through to citations and referencing - as well as preparing for your interview.

Free courses on postgraduate study

Are you ready for postgraduate study?

This free course, Are you ready for postgraduate study, will help you to become familiar with the requirements and demands of postgraduate study and ensure you are ready to develop the skills and confidence to pursue your learning further.

Succeeding in postgraduate study

This free course, Succeeding in postgraduate study, will help you to become familiar with the requirements and demands of postgraduate study and to develop the skills and confidence to pursue your learning further.

Applying to study for a PhD in psychology

This free OpenLearn course is for psychology students and graduates who are interested in PhD study at some future point. Even if you have met PhD students and heard about their projects, it is likely that you have only a vague idea of what PhD study entails. This course is intended to give you more information.

Become an OU student

Ratings & comments, share this free course, copyright information, publication details.

• Originally published: Tuesday, 27 June 2023
• Body text - Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 : The Open University
• Image 'Pebbles balance on a stone see-saw' - Copyright: Photo  51106733  /  Balance  ©  Anatoli Styf  |  Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Camera equipment set up filming a man talking' - Copyright: Photo  42631221  ©  Gabriel Robledo  |  Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Applying to study for a PhD in psychology' - Copyright free
• Image 'Succeeding in postgraduate study' - Copyright: © Everste/Getty Images
• Image 'Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal' - Copyright: Photo 50384175 / Children Playing © Lenutaidi | Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview' - Copyright: Photo 133038259 / Black Student © Fizkes | Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Defining your research methodology' - Copyright free
• Image 'Writing your research proposal' - Copyright free
• Image 'Are you ready for postgraduate study?' - Copyright free

Rate and Review

Rate this article, review this article.

Log into OpenLearn to leave reviews and join in the conversation.

Article reviews

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

The Research Whisperer

Just like the thesis whisperer – but with more money, how to write a successful ethics application.

She has a particular interest in tuberculosis, viral hepatitis, adolescent health, and the health of people in criminal justice settings.

Kat advises colleagues from diverse backgrounds on research ethics, study design, and data analysis.

She tweets from @epi_punk .

The word “ethics” strikes fear into the hearts of most early career researchers.

Some of the reasons are beyond our control, but there’s actually a lot we can do to make our own experiences of the ethics approval process less painful.

I’m writing this from two perspectives: as an early career researcher (I finished my PhD in 2019), and as a committee member (I’ve sat on an ethics advisory group since the start of my PhD in 2014).

The job of ethics committees is to identify the possible risks in a project, and then assess whether the research team:

• are aware of the risks.
• are taking appropriate steps to minimise them.
• have a plan to handle anything that does go wrong.

To do this, ethics committees need information. If you want your ethics application to get through the process as quickly as possible, you need to give the committee enough detail so that they understand your project and how you are managing any risks.

Getting your application as right as possible the first time makes the whole process go more quickly. If you don’t provide enough information, the committee will come back with questions. You may need to resubmit your application to the next meeting, which could be a month or two away.

Spending more time on your application for the first meeting can save you months later on!

Here are the main questions ethics committees will ask themselves when they assess your project:

• Are there any risks to the researchers? (e.g. Injuries in the lab, safety risks  travelling to study sites, exposure to distressing topics during interviews or data analysis.)
• Are there any risks to the study participants? (From the study procedures themselves; risks to their privacy; risks of distress if they are asked about or exposed to upsetting content)
• Are there any risks to third parties? (i.e. people who aren’t directly participating)
• Could anybody’s privacy be invaded by the data collection process?
• Are there other staff in a lab who might be hurt if there were an accident?
• Are the research team aware of these risks, are they taking steps to minimise them, and do they have a plan if things go wrong?

The only way for the ethics committee to assess this is from the information you put into your application. Carefully think through your project and ask yourself those questions. And then put all of the answers into your application.

Here’s an example:

I am planning a project at the moment that involves interviewing health care providers about vulnerable people that they work with.

What are the risks to me? There aren’t any physical safety risks – I’ll be sitting in my office on the phone.

What about psychological risks? Could I be distressed by the content of the interviews? It’s possible. Some of the people I’ll interview are working with clients who have experienced child abuse, and some of their stories about their work might be upsetting.

What am I doing about these risks? I’m conducting interviews on the phone, rather than travelling to other people’s workplaces or homes. I won’t ask specifically about any distressing topics (minimising the risk), although they might come up anyway. If I get upset about the content of the interviews, I will probably be okay: I’ve worked in this area for many years, and I have strategies for dealing with it when my work upsets me (taking a break, talking to a colleague on the same project later on to help me process my feelings about it).

All of this goes into my application! I don’t write “I will conduct interviews with providers” and then say there are no risks, or that I have managed the risks. I give the committee all the details about each of the foreseeable risks I’ve identified, and exactly what I’m doing about them.

What about the risks to my participants? They could also find the content of the interviews upsetting. Again, my interview tool doesn’t ask directly about any distressing topics (minimising the risk), but it may come up. What’s my plan if my participants get upset? I’ll offer to change the topic, take a break, or stop the interview entirely. I mention this risk in the consent form, and the form will tell participants that they will have these options if they feel distressed. I will repeat this to them verbally at the start of the interview, and remind them that they don’t need to discuss anything with me that they don’t want to. Again, all these details go into my application.

What about risks to other people? Some health care providers might tell me private or sensitive information about their clients, by giving me specific examples instead of talking in general terms. To avoid this, I will ask them at the start of the interview not to talk about specific individuals, but to rather keep their answers general. If a participant does start to talk about an individual, I’ll remind them that this isn’t appropriate. I’ll also erase that part of the recording later on, so that those information isn’t transcribed. Again, all these details go into my application so that the ethics committee can see that I’m aware of the risk and I have a plan to manage it if it occurs.

As a committee member, I see applications get into trouble for a few common reasons.

The first is a lack of information , giving a very brief description of what will be done, without enough detail for the committee to understand the risks and what is being done about them.

The second is inconsistency , when a researcher says one thing on their application form, and something else in their consent form. Check carefully for consistency across all your documents before you submit.

A third is when a researcher proposes to do something that directly goes against the national ethical standards for research (e.g. collecting data without consent when they could get consent, or storing sensitive data in an insecure manner). Do not do this.

Some general tips:

• Find out the deadlines for your committee now, and start your application well in advance. It’s very hard to do a good job at the last minute, especially if you need details from your supervisor or other people in the project.
• Ask a colleague for a previous successful application for a similar project. Take note of the risks they identified, and how they managed them. Look at their consent forms and other documents, and see what you can adapt and reuse.
• Use grant applications for the project as a source of information on background, aims, methods, and outcomes. The format and level of detail required by the ethics committee is often similar.
• Read your country’s ethical guidance for research projects: this is what the ethics committee is working off. Think about which issues apply to your project, and how you can meet each of the standards. Spell this out for the committee.
• Find out whether your institution has specific requirements regarding wording in consent forms, storage of data, handling chemicals in the lab, etc. In your application, tell the committee that you are aware of these requirements and say how your project will meet them. Make sure that your consent forms and other documents are consistent with your institution’s standards. If your institution offers templates, use them!
• Ethics committees also assess the technical soundness of the research because poor quality research wastes time and resources, and exposes people to risks that aren’t justified by adequate benefits. Most committees include statistician and methods experts specifically for this reason (I’m one of them). Give a detailed explanation of your methods, and make sure they are appropriate to your research question. Get advice from a methods expert or a statistician to check that your project is sound – it’s much better to identify problems at the planning stage, rather than after you’ve gotten approval and collected your data.
• If you are doing an application for the first time, get help from your supervisor or thesis advisor. They shouldn’t make you do the application on your own. The more help you can get before you submit, the more quickly your project will get approved.

Share this:

Also I suggest doing the ethics training offered by your institution, or professional body. Recently I attended ANU’s Human Ethics training session. While I occasionally teach ethics, and have been a Chief Investigator on a project, I still found it useful. https://services.anu.edu.au/training/aries-human-ethics-training-sessions

Another useful resource is The Research Ethics Application Database (TREAD), an online database of successful research ethics applications from around the world, some of which include supporting documents such as consent forms and information sheets. (TREAD is also glad to have new submissions so if you have made a successful application, please consider sharing your paperwork – fully anonymised of course.) Info here https://tread.tghn.org/

Like Liked by 1 person

[…] Writing your ethics application? Here’s some tips! […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Research Proposal Ethics Statement Example

• Rachel R.N.
• July 9, 2024
• How to Guides

In the world of academic and professional research, ethical considerations are paramount. Whether you’re studying human behavior, testing new technologies, or analyzing historical data, your research must adhere to strict ethical standards. This is where an ethics statement comes into play. It’s a crucial component of any research proposal, demonstrating your commitment to conducting responsible, respectful, and rigorous research.

This comprehensive guide will walk you through the process of creating an ethics statement for your research proposal. We’ll explore each component in detail, provide examples, and offer insights to help you navigate potential ethical challenges.

By the end of this guide, you’ll have a clear understanding of how to craft an ethics statement that not only meets institutional requirements but also upholds the highest standards of ethical research.

What You'll Learn

What is an Ethics Statement?

An ethics statement, also known as an ethical considerations section or ethical framework, is a detailed document within your research proposal that outlines how you plan to address ethical issues throughout your study. It serves as a roadmap for conducting ethical research, demonstrating your awareness of potential ethical challenges and your strategies for managing them.

Key Purposes of an Ethics Statement:

• Participant Protection : It outlines measures to ensure the safety, privacy, and well-being of research participants.
• Ethical Compliance : It shows that your research adheres to established ethical guidelines and regulations.
• Transparency : It provides a clear overview of your research methods and potential impacts.
• Risk Management : It identifies potential ethical risks and outlines strategies to mitigate them.
• Quality Assurance : It helps maintain the integrity and credibility of your research.

Why is an Ethics Statement Important?

The importance of an ethics statement extends far beyond simply fulfilling a requirement. Let’s delve deeper into why this document is crucial for your research:

1. Protects Participants

The primary purpose of an ethics statement is to ensure the safety, rights, and well-being of your research participants. This includes:

• Physical safety: Minimizing any potential for harm or discomfort.
• Psychological well-being: Addressing potential emotional or mental stress.
• Privacy: Protecting personal information and maintaining confidentiality.
• Autonomy: Respecting participants’ right to make informed decisions about their involvement.

2. Builds Trust

An ethics statement demonstrates your commitment to ethical research practices, which helps to:

• Build credibility with participants, making them more likely to engage honestly.
• Establish trust with your institution, funding bodies, and the wider research community.
• Enhance the reputation of your research and your professional standing.

3. Meets Requirements

Many institutions and funding bodies require an ethics statement as part of the research proposal. It’s often a key factor in:

• Obtaining approval from ethics committees or institutional review boards.
• Securing funding for your research project.
• Getting permission to publish your findings in academic journals.

4. Improves Research Quality

Considering ethical implications often leads to better research design:

• It encourages you to think critically about your methodology.
• It helps identify potential biases or limitations in your approach.
• It can lead to more robust data collection and analysis procedures.

5. Promotes Responsible Science

An ethics statement contributes to the broader goal of promoting responsible scientific practices:

• It helps prevent misconduct and unethical behavior in research.
• It encourages transparency and reproducibility in scientific studies.
• It supports the overall integrity of the scientific process.

Key Components of an Ethics Statement

A comprehensive ethics statement typically includes the following components:

• Informed Consent
• Confidentiality and Privacy
• Risk Assessment and Management
• Data Storage and Protection
• Conflicts of Interest
• Vulnerable Populations (if applicable)
• Cultural Sensitivity
• Deception (if applicable)
• Ethical Approval Process

Let’s examine each of these components in detail, providing explanations, examples, and best practices for addressing them in your ethics statement.

1. Informed Consent

What it is:.

Informed consent is the process by which potential research participants are given all the information they need to make an educated decision about whether to participate in a study. It’s a fundamental ethical principle that respects individuals’ autonomy and right to self-determination.

Why it matters:

Informed consent ensures that participants understand what they’re agreeing to, including any potential risks or benefits. It protects participants from exploitation and helps maintain the integrity of the research process.

How to address it:

Explain in detail how you’ll obtain informed consent from participants. This typically involves:

• Providing an information sheet that clearly explains the study’s purpose, procedures, duration, potential risks and benefits, and participants’ rights.
• Using language that is easy to understand, avoiding jargon or complex terms.
• Allowing time for potential participants to ask questions and consider their decision.
• Obtaining written consent through a signed form or digital agreement for online studies.
• For ongoing studies, implementing a process for continuous consent, allowing participants to withdraw at any time.

“All potential participants will receive a comprehensive information sheet detailing the study’s objectives, methods, expected duration, and potential risks and benefits. This information will be presented in clear, jargon-free language and will be available in multiple languages to accommodate our diverse participant pool. Potential participants will have a minimum of 48 hours to review this information and ask any questions before being asked to sign a consent form. The consent form will clearly state that participation is voluntary and that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. For our online surveys, we will use a digital consent form that must be completed before accessing the survey questions. In the case of our longitudinal study component, we will implement a process of continuous consent, reconfirming participants’ willingness to continue at each stage of data collection.”

2. Confidentiality and Privacy

Confidentiality refers to the protection of participants’ personal information and the data they provide during the research. Privacy relates to participants’ right to control information about themselves and decide what information is shared and with whom.

Maintaining confidentiality and privacy is crucial for several reasons:

• It protects participants from potential harm or embarrassment that could result from their information being disclosed.
• It encourages honest and open responses, improving the quality of your data.
• It’s often a legal requirement, particularly when dealing with sensitive personal information.

Describe in detail the measures you’ll take to ensure confidentiality and protect participants’ privacy. This may include:

• Anonymization or pseudonymization of data
• Secure storage of identifying information
• Limited access to raw data
• Confidentiality agreements for research team members
• Plans for secure destruction of data after the retention period

“To ensure the highest level of confidentiality and privacy, we will implement a multi-layered approach:

• Data Anonymization: All collected data will be immediately anonymized. Each participant will be assigned a unique identifier, and any personally identifiable information will be removed from the dataset.
• Secure Data Storage: All research data will be stored on encrypted, password-protected servers. Physical documents will be kept in a locked cabinet in a secure office accessible only to authorized research team members.
• Limited Access: Only essential members of the research team will have access to the raw data. All team members will sign confidentiality agreements before being granted access.
• Separation of Identifying Information: Any documents linking participant identities to their unique identifiers will be stored separately from the research data, with access restricted to the principal investigator.
• Secure Data Transmission: When transferring data between researchers or institutions, we will use secure, encrypted file transfer protocols.
• Publication Safeguards: In all publications and presentations, we will ensure that no individual participant can be identified. We will use aggregate data and, where necessary, alter non-essential details to protect privacy.
• Data Retention and Destruction: We will retain the anonymized data for five years after the study’s completion, as required by our institution. After this period, electronic data will be securely erased using data destruction software, and physical documents will be shredded and disposed of securely.
• Participant Control: Participants will be informed of their right to request access to their personal data or to have it deleted at any time during the study.”

3. Risk Assessment and Management

Risk assessment involves identifying and evaluating potential risks to participants, researchers, or others involved in the study. Risk management is the process of developing strategies to minimize these risks.

Thorough risk assessment and management are crucial for:

• Protecting the physical and psychological well-being of participants and researchers
• Maintaining the ethical integrity of your research
• Complying with legal and institutional requirements
• Anticipating and preventing potential problems that could compromise your study

Provide a comprehensive overview of potential risks associated with your study and detailed plans for managing each risk. Consider:

• Physical risks
• Psychological risks
• Social risks
• Economic risks
• Legal risks

For each identified risk, explain:

• The nature and likelihood of the risk
• The potential impact if the risk occurs
• Strategies to prevent or minimize the risk
• Plans for addressing the risk if it does occur

“Our study on workplace stress involves both online surveys and in-person interviews. We have identified the following potential risks and developed corresponding management strategies:

• Risk: Participants may experience emotional distress when discussing stressful work experiences.
• Management: a) We will clearly warn participants about potentially distressing topics in the informed consent process. b) Participants will be reminded that they can skip questions or stop the interview at any time. c) We will provide contact information for free counseling services to all participants. d) Interviewers will be trained to recognize signs of distress and respond appropriately.
• Risk: Unauthorized access to sensitive personal and professional information.
• Management: a) Implementation of robust data security measures as outlined in our confidentiality section. b) Regular security audits of our data storage systems. c) Minimal collection of identifying information. d) Development of a data breach response plan, including prompt notification to affected participants.
• Risk: Participants may fear negative consequences at work if their responses become known to employers.
• Management: a) Strict confidentiality measures as detailed earlier. b) Clear communication to participants about how their data will be used and protected. c) Option for participants to review and approve any potentially identifying quotes before publication.
• Risk: Minimal risk of physical discomfort during lengthy interviews.
• Management: a) Interviews will be limited to 90 minutes with optional breaks. b) Interview locations will be chosen for comfort and accessibility. c) Participants will be encouraged to inform the interviewer if they need to pause or stop for any reason.
• Risk: Participation may be time-consuming, potentially causing stress or inconvenience.
• Management: a) Clear communication of expected time commitment in the informed consent process. b) Flexibility in scheduling interviews to accommodate participants’ preferences. c) Option to complete the survey in multiple sessions if needed.

In the unlikely event that any unanticipated risks emerge during the study, we will immediately halt data collection, assess the situation, and consult with our institutional ethics committee before proceeding.”

4. Data Storage and Protection

Data storage and protection refer to the methods and systems used to securely store, manage, and eventually dispose of research data. This includes both physical (e.g., paper documents) and digital data.

Proper data storage and protection are essential for:

• Maintaining participant confidentiality and privacy
• Ensuring the integrity and reliability of your research data
• Complying with data protection laws and regulations (e.g., GDPR in the EU)
• Preventing unauthorized access, data loss, or data breaches

Provide a detailed plan for how you will handle data throughout the research process. Include information on:

• Where and how data will be stored
• Who will have access to the data
• How long data will be retained
• How data will be securely destroyed after the retention period
• Measures to protect against data breaches or loss

“Our data storage and protection plan encompasses the entire data lifecycle, from collection to destruction:

• Online surveys will be conducted using Qualtrics, a GDPR-compliant platform with robust security features.
• Interview recordings will be made using encrypted digital recorders.
• All data transfers will occur over secure, encrypted connections.
• Physical transfer of data (e.g., from interview sites) will use encrypted portable devices.
• Digital data will be stored on a secure, access-controlled server maintained by our university’s IT department. This server is backed up daily and protected by enterprise-level firewalls.
• Any physical documents will be stored in a locked filing cabinet in a secure office accessible only to authorized research team members.
• Access to raw data will be limited to essential research team members, each of whom will have unique login credentials.
• A log will be maintained of all data access events.
• Data analysis will be conducted on secure, password-protected computers in a designated research area.
• When working remotely, researchers will use a secure VPN connection to access data.
• We will retain research data for five years after the completion of the study, as per our institution’s policy.
• During this time, data will be regularly reviewed to ensure it remains necessary for the purposes for which it is being retained.
• After the retention period, digital data will be securely erased using certified data destruction software that overwrites the data multiple times.
• Physical documents will be shredded using a cross-cut shredder and disposed of securely.
• In the event of a suspected data breach, we will immediately: a) Isolate affected systems to prevent further unauthorized access. b) Notify our institution’s data protection officer and IT security team. c) Conduct a thorough investigation to determine the extent of the breach. d) Notify affected participants and relevant authorities as required by law. e) Implement necessary measures to prevent similar breaches in the future.
• Our data protection measures will be reviewed and updated regularly to ensure they remain effective and comply with current best practices and regulations.”

5. Conflicts of Interest

A conflict of interest in research occurs when professional judgment concerning a primary interest (such as research validity) may be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain or personal relationship).

Addressing conflicts of interest is crucial for:

• Maintaining the integrity and credibility of your research
• Ensuring unbiased data collection and analysis
• Complying with ethical guidelines and institutional policies
• Building trust with participants, peers, and the public

Provide a clear disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest related to your research. This should include:

• Financial interests (e.g., funding sources, personal investments)
• Personal relationships (e.g., familial ties to participants or stakeholders)
• Professional relationships (e.g., consulting work, board memberships)
• Intellectual property interests

For each potential conflict, explain how you plan to manage it to minimize its impact on your research.

“In the interest of full transparency, we disclose the following potential conflicts of interest and our plans to manage them:

• Potential Conflict: This study is partially funded by TechCorp, a major player in the industry we’re researching.
• Management Plan: a) The funding agreement explicitly states that TechCorp has no influence over the study design, data collection, analysis, or publication of results. b) We will clearly acknowledge TechCorp’s funding in all publications and presentations. c) All raw data and analysis procedures will be made available for independent verification.
• Potential Conflict: The lead researcher’s spouse is an employee of one of the companies included in our study.
• Management Plan: a) The lead researcher will not be involved in data collection or initial analysis for this specific company. b) An independent researcher will be brought in to oversee the data collection and analysis for this company. c) This relationship will be disclosed in all publications resulting from this research.
• Potential Conflict: One of our co-investigators has previously done consulting work for several companies in the industry we’re studying.
• Management Plan: a) The co-investigator will not be involved in data collection from any companies they’ve consulted for in the past five years. b) We will maintain a log of which team members are involved in data collection and analysis for each company to ensure no conflicts. c) This past consulting work will be disclosed in our methodology section and any resulting publications.
• Potential Conflict: Our research may lead to patentable innovations in workplace stress management tools.
• Management Plan: a) We have established a clear agreement with our institution regarding the ownership and potential commercialization of any intellectual property resulting from this research. b) Any patents filed as a result of this research will be disclosed this in future related academic work.
• Potential Conflict: The principal investigator has publicly expressed strong views on workplace stress management policies.
• Management Plan: a) We will implement a structured, objective data collection and analysis protocol to minimize potential bias. b) An independent researcher will review our analysis and conclusions to ensure objectivity. c) We will explicitly address how we’ve managed this potential bias in our methodology section.

We are committed to managing these conflicts of interest transparently and ethically. We will promptly disclose any additional conflicts that may arise during the course of the research and develop appropriate management strategies in consultation with our institutional ethics committee.”

6. Vulnerable Populations (if applicable)

Vulnerable populations are groups that require special ethical considerations due to their increased susceptibility to harm or exploitation in research contexts. These may include children, elderly individuals, prisoners, individuals with cognitive impairments, or socially or economically disadvantaged groups.

Extra care must be taken when working with vulnerable populations to:

• Protect their rights and well-being
• Ensure they are not exploited or unfairly burdened by research
• Address unique ethical challenges that may arise
• Comply with specific regulations governing research with these groups

If your research involves vulnerable populations, provide a detailed explanation of:

• Why the inclusion of this population is necessary for your research
• The specific vulnerabilities of this group in the context of your study
• Extra precautions you’ll take to protect their rights and well-being
• How you’ll obtain informed consent (including from guardians if applicable)
• Any special accommodations you’ll make in your research procedures

“Our study on the effects of social media use on mental health includes adolescents aged 13-17, who are considered a vulnerable population. We address this as follows:

• Justification for Inclusion: Adolescents are primary users of social media, and understanding its impact on their mental health is crucial for developing appropriate interventions and policies.
• Limited capacity to assess long-term risks and benefits
• Susceptibility to peer influence
• Ongoing cognitive and emotional development
• Potential for parental influence on participation decision
• We will obtain written consent from a parent or legal guardian for all participants under 18.
• We will also obtain assent from the adolescents themselves, using an age-appropriate assent form.
• Both parents and adolescents will be informed that the adolescent can withdraw at any time, regardless of parental consent.
• All study materials, including information sheets and survey questions, will be written in clear, simple language appropriate for the youngest participants.
• We will pilot test these materials with a small group of adolescents to ensure comprehension.
• Extra measures will be taken to protect adolescents’ privacy, including conducting online surveys that can be completed privately.
• We will clearly explain to both parents and adolescents what information will and will not be shared with parents.
• Our study is designed to pose no more than minimal risk to participants.
• Questions about sensitive topics (e.g., cyberbullying) will be carefully worded and optional.
• We will provide all participants with information about mental health resources, including helplines and online support specifically for adolescents.
• All researchers interacting with adolescent participants will undergo specialized training in working with this age group.
• We will establish a process for ongoing monitoring of participant well-being throughout the study.
• We will clearly explain our legal obligations to report any disclosures of abuse or serious self-harm, both in the consent/assent process and at the beginning of data collection.

By implementing these measures, we aim to conduct our research ethically and responsibly while gathering valuable data on this important topic.”

7. Cultural Sensitivity

Cultural sensitivity in research involves recognizing, respecting, and appropriately responding to the diversity of cultural backgrounds, beliefs, and practices among your research participants.

Cultural sensitivity is crucial for:

• Ensuring equitable treatment of all participants
• Avoiding misunderstandings or offense that could compromise your research
• Collecting more accurate and meaningful data
• Building trust with diverse communities
• Producing research results that are applicable across different cultural contexts

Explain how you’ll ensure cultural sensitivity throughout your research process. Consider:

• Language and communication
• Customs and traditions
• Religious beliefs and practices
• Gender roles and norms
• Socioeconomic factors

“Our research on global workplace practices involves participants from diverse cultural backgrounds. We will ensure cultural sensitivity through the following measures:

• All research materials (information sheets, consent forms, surveys, interview scripts) will be professionally translated into the primary languages of our participant groups.
• Bilingual researchers or interpreters will be available for interviews and focus groups.
• We will consult with cultural experts or community leaders from each major cultural group represented in our study to review our research materials and protocols.
• These consultations will help us identify and address potential cultural sensitivities or misunderstandings.
• Our research team includes members from various cultural backgrounds, providing diverse perspectives in study design and data interpretation.
• Team members will undergo cultural competency training specific to the cultures represented in our study.
• We will accommodate different cultural and religious observances when scheduling interviews and focus groups.
• Participants will be asked about any timing considerations during the recruitment process.
• In cultures where it may be inappropriate for men to interview women (or vice versa), we will match the gender of interviewers and participants as needed.
• We will be mindful of gender dynamics in mixed-gender focus groups and adjust our facilitation accordingly.
• We will consult with local contacts to ensure that any incentives or compensation offered are culturally appropriate and do not inadvertently cause offense or undue influence.
• In cultures where it’s important to obtain approval from community leaders or elders before conducting research, we will follow appropriate protocols to seek this approval.
• We will be mindful of culturally sensitive topics and approach them carefully in our questions.
• Participants will always have the option to decline answering any questions they’re uncomfortable with.
• We will be cautious about imposing Western frameworks on data interpretation and will consider cultural contexts in our analysis.
• Where appropriate, we will involve participants or cultural consultants in reviewing our interpretations.
• We will make efforts to disseminate our research findings in culturally appropriate ways, including providing summaries in local languages.
• We will be mindful of any cultural sensitivities in how we present our findings.

By implementing these measures, we aim to conduct our research in a way that respects and values the cultural diversity of our participants, leading to more valid and ethically sound results.”

8. Deception (if applicable)

Deception in research involves deliberately withholding information from or misleading participants about the true nature or purpose of a study.

While sometimes necessary for certain types of research (e.g., some psychology studies), deception raises significant ethical concerns:

• It can violate the principle of informed consent
• It may cause distress to participants when the deception is revealed
• It can potentially damage trust in researchers and the scientific process

If your research involves any form of deception, you must:

• Provide a strong justification for why deception is necessary
• Explain why alternative methods without deception are not feasible
• Describe the nature and extent of the deception
• Detail how and when participants will be debriefed
• Explain how you’ll mitigate potential negative effects of the deception

“Our study on decision-making under pressure involves a minor element of deception. We address this as follows:

• Justification for Deception: The study aims to measure natural responses to unexpected time pressure. If participants know in advance that they will face sudden time constraints, it would likely alter their behavior and invalidate our results.
• Nature of Deception: Participants will be told they have 30 minutes to complete a series of decision-making tasks. However, at a random point between 10-15 minutes into the session, they will be informed that due to a “scheduling error,” they must complete the tasks in the next 5 minutes.
• Alternatives Considered: We considered informing participants that time pressure might be introduced but concluded this would still likely alter their approach to the tasks. We also considered using naturally occurring time pressure situations but found we couldn’t control for important variables in such settings.
• The deception is minor and short-lived.
• No false information is given about the nature of the tasks themselves.
• The time pressure, while unexpected, is not extreme and poses minimal risk of distress.
• Immediately after completing the tasks, participants will be fully debriefed about the deception.
• We will explain the true purpose of the study and the reason for the deception.
• Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions and discuss their experience.
• We will assess whether the deception caused any distress and provide appropriate support if needed.
• During the debriefing, participants will be given the option to withdraw their data if they are uncomfortable with the deception used.
• This will be a genuine option with no penalty, and we will make it clear that withdrawing will not affect any compensation they were promised.
• This use of deception has been reviewed and approved by our institutional ethics committee.
• We will report any unanticipated negative reactions to the committee and adjust our protocols if necessary.

By carefully limiting and managing this minor deception, we aim to balance the scientific need for valid data with our ethical obligation to treat participants with respect and minimize potential harm.”

9. Debriefing

Debriefing is the process of providing participants with full information about the study after their participation is complete. It’s particularly important in studies involving deception but is valuable in all types of research.

Debriefing serves several important purposes:

• It fulfills the ethical obligation to inform participants about the true nature of the research they participated in
• It provides an opportunity to assess and mitigate any negative effects of participation
• It can be an educational opportunity for participants to learn about the research process
• It allows researchers to gather valuable feedback from participants

Explain your debriefing process, including:

• When and how debriefing will occur
• What information will be provided during debriefing
• How you’ll address any questions or concerns raised by participants
• What support will be available if participants experience any distress

“Our debriefing process is designed to ensure that all participants leave the study fully informed and with a positive research experience:

• Debriefing will occur immediately after the completion of each participant’s involvement in the study.
• For in-person studies, this will be a face-to-face conversation. For online studies, we will provide a detailed written debriefing followed by the option for a phone or video call with a researcher.
• We will explain the full purpose of the study, including any elements that were not disclosed at the outset.
• We’ll describe how the data will be used and what we hope to learn from the study.
• If any deception was used, we’ll explain why it was necessary and give participants the option to withdraw their data.
• We’ll invite participants to share their experience of the study and any thoughts or feelings it brought up.
• This feedback will be recorded (with permission) to help us improve our research processes.
• Participants will be encouraged to ask any questions they have about the study.
• We’ll provide honest, clear answers and take the time to ensure participants fully understand.
• We’ll ask participants if they experienced any discomfort or distress during the study.
• If any negative impacts are identified, we’ll discuss these with the participant and offer appropriate support.
• All participants will receive a handout with contact information for the research team and relevant support services.
• For studies dealing with sensitive topics, we’ll have a trained counselor available during debriefing sessions.
• Participants will be given the option to receive a summary of the study results when available.
• We’ll provide our contact information and encourage participants to reach out if they have any questions or concerns in the future.
• We’ll remind participants about our confidentiality procedures and how their data will be protected.
• We’ll express our sincere thanks for their participation and explain how their contribution helps advance knowledge in the field.

By conducting thorough, thoughtful debriefings, we aim to ensure that participation in our research is a positive, educational experience and that participants feel respected and valued for their contribution.”

10. Ethical Approval Process

The ethical approval process involves submitting your research proposal, including your ethics statement, to an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee for review and approval before beginning your research.

Obtaining ethical approval is crucial because it:

• Ensures your research meets established ethical standards
• Protects the rights and well-being of your participants
• Helps identify and address potential ethical issues before they arise
• Is often required for publication and funding
• Provides legal and institutional protection for researchers

Outline the steps you’ll take to obtain ethical approval, including:

• Which ethics committee or IRB you’ll submit to
• What documents you’ll include in your submission
• Your timeline for obtaining approval
• How you’ll address any feedback or concerns from the committee
• Your plan for ongoing ethical oversight throughout the research process

Related Articles

How to Critically Appraise a Research Article

How to Write a Psychology Research Proposal

Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal

“We are committed to conducting our research in full compliance with ethical standards. Our ethical approval process will proceed as follows:

• Detailed research proposal
• This ethics statement
• All research instruments (surveys, interview guides, etc.)
• Informed consent forms
• Recruitment materials
• Data management plan
• CVs of key research personnel
• Before submission, our application will be reviewed by senior colleagues in our department to identify any potential issues.
• We will submit our application to the University of [Name] Institutional Review Board (IRB).
• Submission will occur at least two months before our planned start date to allow time for review and any necessary revisions.
• We will promptly address any questions or concerns raised by the IRB.
• If major changes are required, we will consult with our research team and advisors to ensure we maintain the integrity of our study while meeting ethical requirements.
• We will not begin any recruitment or data collection until we have received written approval from the IRB.
• Once approved, we will keep a copy of the approval letter on file and available for review if needed.
• We will adhere strictly to the approved protocol throughout the study.
• Any proposed changes to the research design or procedures will be submitted to the IRB for review and approval before implementation.
• We will promptly report any unanticipated problems or adverse events to the IRB.
• For studies lasting more than one year, we will submit an annual progress report to the IRB for continuing review and approval.
• Upon completion of the study, we will submit a final report to the IRB, including a summary of results and any ethical issues encountered.
• We will include a statement about ethical approval in all publications and presentations resulting from this research.

By following this rigorous ethical approval process, we aim to ensure that our research meets the highest ethical standards and respects the rights and well-being of all participants.”

Start by filling this short order form order.studyinghq.com

And then follow the progressive flow. 

Having an issue, chat with us here

Cathy, CS. 

New Concept ? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​

Yet to start your paper have a subject expert write for you now, test our paper writing service for less, already began delegate the remaining part to our professional writers.

📕 Studying HQ

Typically replies within minutes

Hey! 👋 Need help with an assignment?

🟢 Online | Privacy policy

WhatsApp us

• Privacy Policy

Home » Ethical Considerations – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

Ethical Considerations – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations in research refer to the principles and guidelines that researchers must follow to ensure that their studies are conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. These considerations are designed to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of research participants, as well as the integrity and credibility of the research itself

Some of the key ethical considerations in research include:

• Informed consent: Researchers must obtain informed consent from study participants, which means they must inform participants about the study’s purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, and their right to withdraw at any time.
• Privacy and confidentiality : Researchers must ensure that participants’ privacy and confidentiality are protected. This means that personal information should be kept confidential and not shared without the participant’s consent.
• Harm reduction : Researchers must ensure that the study does not harm the participants physically or psychologically. They must take steps to minimize the risks associated with the study.
• Fairness and equity : Researchers must ensure that the study does not discriminate against any particular group or individual. They should treat all participants equally and fairly.
• Use of deception: Researchers must use deception only if it is necessary to achieve the study’s objectives. They must inform participants of the deception as soon as possible.
• Use of vulnerable populations : Researchers must be especially cautious when working with vulnerable populations, such as children, pregnant women, prisoners, and individuals with cognitive or intellectual disabilities.
• Conflict of interest : Researchers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect the study’s integrity. This includes financial or personal relationships that could influence the study’s results.
• Data manipulation: Researchers must not manipulate data to support a particular hypothesis or agenda. They should report the results of the study objectively, even if the findings are not consistent with their expectations.
• Intellectual property: Researchers must respect intellectual property rights and give credit to previous studies and research.
• Cultural sensitivity : Researchers must be sensitive to the cultural norms and beliefs of the participants. They should avoid imposing their values and beliefs on the participants and should be respectful of their cultural practices.

Types of Ethical Considerations

Types of Ethical Considerations are as follows:

Research Ethics:

This includes ethical principles and guidelines that govern research involving human or animal subjects, ensuring that the research is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner.

Business Ethics :

This refers to ethical principles and standards that guide business practices and decision-making, such as transparency, honesty, fairness, and social responsibility.

Medical Ethics :

This refers to ethical principles and standards that govern the practice of medicine, including the duty to protect patient autonomy, informed consent, confidentiality, and non-maleficence.

Environmental Ethics :

This involves ethical principles and values that guide our interactions with the natural world, including the obligation to protect the environment, minimize harm, and promote sustainability.

Legal Ethics

This involves ethical principles and standards that guide the conduct of legal professionals, including issues such as confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and professional competence.

Social Ethics

This involves ethical principles and values that guide our interactions with other individuals and society as a whole, including issues such as justice, fairness, and human rights.

Information Ethics

This involves ethical principles and values that govern the use and dissemination of information, including issues such as privacy, accuracy, and intellectual property.

Cultural Ethics

This involves ethical principles and values that govern the relationship between different cultures and communities, including issues such as respect for diversity, cultural sensitivity, and inclusivity.

Technological Ethics

This refers to ethical principles and guidelines that govern the development, use, and impact of technology, including issues such as privacy, security, and social responsibility.

Journalism Ethics

This involves ethical principles and standards that guide the practice of journalism, including issues such as accuracy, fairness, and the public interest.

Educational Ethics

This refers to ethical principles and standards that guide the practice of education, including issues such as academic integrity, fairness, and respect for diversity.

Political Ethics

This involves ethical principles and values that guide political decision-making and behavior, including issues such as accountability, transparency, and the protection of civil liberties.

Professional Ethics

This refers to ethical principles and standards that guide the conduct of professionals in various fields, including issues such as honesty, integrity, and competence.

Personal Ethics

This involves ethical principles and values that guide individual behavior and decision-making, including issues such as personal responsibility, honesty, and respect for others.

Global Ethics

This involves ethical principles and values that guide our interactions with other nations and the global community, including issues such as human rights, environmental protection, and social justice.

Applications of Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations are important in many areas of society, including medicine, business, law, and technology. Here are some specific applications of ethical considerations:

• Medical research : Ethical considerations are crucial in medical research, particularly when human subjects are involved. Researchers must ensure that their studies are conducted in a way that does not harm participants and that participants give informed consent before participating.
• Business practices: Ethical considerations are also important in business, where companies must make decisions that are socially responsible and avoid activities that are harmful to society. For example, companies must ensure that their products are safe for consumers and that they do not engage in exploitative labor practices.
• Environmental protection: Ethical considerations play a crucial role in environmental protection, as companies and governments must weigh the benefits of economic development against the potential harm to the environment. Decisions about land use, resource allocation, and pollution must be made in an ethical manner that takes into account the long-term consequences for the planet and future generations.
• Technology development : As technology continues to advance rapidly, ethical considerations become increasingly important in areas such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and genetic engineering. Developers must ensure that their creations do not harm humans or the environment and that they are developed in a way that is fair and equitable.
• Legal system : The legal system relies on ethical considerations to ensure that justice is served and that individuals are treated fairly. Lawyers and judges must abide by ethical standards to maintain the integrity of the legal system and to protect the rights of all individuals involved.

Examples of Ethical Considerations

Here are a few examples of ethical considerations in different contexts:

• In healthcare : A doctor must ensure that they provide the best possible care to their patients and avoid causing them harm. They must respect the autonomy of their patients, and obtain informed consent before administering any treatment or procedure. They must also ensure that they maintain patient confidentiality and avoid any conflicts of interest.
• In the workplace: An employer must ensure that they treat their employees fairly and with respect, provide them with a safe working environment, and pay them a fair wage. They must also avoid any discrimination based on race, gender, religion, or any other characteristic protected by law.
• In the media : Journalists must ensure that they report the news accurately and without bias. They must respect the privacy of individuals and avoid causing harm or distress. They must also be transparent about their sources and avoid any conflicts of interest.
• In research: Researchers must ensure that they conduct their studies ethically and with integrity. They must obtain informed consent from participants, protect their privacy, and avoid any harm or discomfort. They must also ensure that their findings are reported accurately and without bias.
• In personal relationships : People must ensure that they treat others with respect and kindness, and avoid causing harm or distress. They must respect the autonomy of others and avoid any actions that would be considered unethical, such as lying or cheating. They must also respect the confidentiality of others and maintain their privacy.

How to Write Ethical Considerations

When writing about research involving human subjects or animals, it is essential to include ethical considerations to ensure that the study is conducted in a manner that is morally responsible and in accordance with professional standards. Here are some steps to help you write ethical considerations:

• Describe the ethical principles: Start by explaining the ethical principles that will guide the research. These could include principles such as respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.
• Discuss informed consent : Informed consent is a critical ethical consideration when conducting research. Explain how you will obtain informed consent from participants, including how you will explain the purpose of the study, potential risks and benefits, and how you will protect their privacy.
• Address confidentiality : Describe how you will protect the confidentiality of the participants’ personal information and data, including any measures you will take to ensure that the data is kept secure and confidential.
• Consider potential risks and benefits : Describe any potential risks or harms to participants that could result from the study and how you will minimize those risks. Also, discuss the potential benefits of the study, both to the participants and to society.
• Discuss the use of animals : If the research involves the use of animals, address the ethical considerations related to animal welfare. Explain how you will minimize any potential harm to the animals and ensure that they are treated ethically.
• Mention the ethical approval : Finally, it’s essential to acknowledge that the research has received ethical approval from the relevant institutional review board or ethics committee. State the name of the committee, the date of approval, and any specific conditions or requirements that were imposed.

When to Write Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations should be written whenever research involves human subjects or has the potential to impact human beings, animals, or the environment in some way. Ethical considerations are also important when research involves sensitive topics, such as mental health, sexuality, or religion.

In general, ethical considerations should be an integral part of any research project, regardless of the field or subject matter. This means that they should be considered at every stage of the research process, from the initial planning and design phase to data collection, analysis, and dissemination.

Ethical considerations should also be written in accordance with the guidelines and standards set by the relevant regulatory bodies and professional associations. These guidelines may vary depending on the discipline, so it is important to be familiar with the specific requirements of your field.

Purpose of Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations are an essential aspect of many areas of life, including business, healthcare, research, and social interactions. The primary purposes of ethical considerations are:

• Protection of human rights: Ethical considerations help ensure that people’s rights are respected and protected. This includes respecting their autonomy, ensuring their privacy is respected, and ensuring that they are not subjected to harm or exploitation.
• Promoting fairness and justice: Ethical considerations help ensure that people are treated fairly and justly, without discrimination or bias. This includes ensuring that everyone has equal access to resources and opportunities, and that decisions are made based on merit rather than personal biases or prejudices.
• Promoting honesty and transparency : Ethical considerations help ensure that people are truthful and transparent in their actions and decisions. This includes being open and honest about conflicts of interest, disclosing potential risks, and communicating clearly with others.
• Maintaining public trust: Ethical considerations help maintain public trust in institutions and individuals. This is important for building and maintaining relationships with customers, patients, colleagues, and other stakeholders.
• Ensuring responsible conduct: Ethical considerations help ensure that people act responsibly and are accountable for their actions. This includes adhering to professional standards and codes of conduct, following laws and regulations, and avoiding behaviors that could harm others or damage the environment.

Advantages of Ethical Considerations

Here are some of the advantages of ethical considerations:

• Builds Trust : When individuals or organizations follow ethical considerations, it creates a sense of trust among stakeholders, including customers, clients, and employees. This trust can lead to stronger relationships and long-term loyalty.
• Reputation and Brand Image : Ethical considerations are often linked to a company’s brand image and reputation. By following ethical practices, a company can establish a positive image and reputation that can enhance its brand value.
• Avoids Legal Issues: Ethical considerations can help individuals and organizations avoid legal issues and penalties. By adhering to ethical principles, companies can reduce the risk of facing lawsuits, regulatory investigations, and fines.
• Increases Employee Retention and Motivation: Employees tend to be more satisfied and motivated when they work for an organization that values ethics. Companies that prioritize ethical considerations tend to have higher employee retention rates, leading to lower recruitment costs.
• Enhances Decision-making: Ethical considerations help individuals and organizations make better decisions. By considering the ethical implications of their actions, decision-makers can evaluate the potential consequences and choose the best course of action.
• Positive Impact on Society: Ethical considerations have a positive impact on society as a whole. By following ethical practices, companies can contribute to social and environmental causes, leading to a more sustainable and equitable society.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Institutional Review Board – Application Sample...

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example...

Table of Contents – Types, Formats, Examples

Research Contribution – Thesis Guide

Conceptual Framework – Types, Methodology and...

Ethics statement examples - ESRC

Introduction.

Proposals submitted to the ESRC must provide a full ethics statement that confirms that proper consideration has been given to any ethics issues raised. All ESRC-funded grants must be approved by at least a light-touch ethics review.

The ESRC does not require a favourable ethics opinion to be secured prior to submission of a research proposal. However, a proposal must state what the applicant considers to be the possible ethics implications throughout the research project lifecycle, what measures will be taken for ongoing consideration of ethics issues, what review will be required for their proposed research and how and when it will be obtained.

Risk and benefit to researchers, participants and others (for example,  potentially stigmatised or marginalised groups) as a result of the research and the potential impact, knowledge exchange, dissemination activity and future re-use of the data should also be considered as part of the ethical statement.

If an ethics review is required at a later stage in the project, this should be discussed and funding arrangements agreed in advance with the ESRC. At a minimum we expect that ethics review will be undertaken prior to the stage in the project that the actual research is carried out.

During peer review, reviewers and assessors will be asked to consider the ethical statement in the proposal. If they disagree with the proposed approach to ethics issues, or the statement does not adequately address these issues, this could lead to the rejection of a proposal, or the award of a conditional grant to ensure the necessary ethical considerations and ethical review are undertaken.

Last updated: 28 January 2022

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services .

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples

Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples

Published on 7 May 2022 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on 6 July 2024.

Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. Scientists and researchers must always adhere to a certain code of conduct when collecting data from people.

The goals of human research often include understanding real-life phenomena, studying effective treatments, investigating behaviours, and improving lives in other ways. What you decide to research and how you conduct that research involve key ethical considerations.

These considerations work to:

• Protect the rights of research participants
• Enhance research validity
• Maintain scientific integrity

Table of contents

Why do research ethics matter, getting ethical approval for your study, types of ethical issues, voluntary participation, informed consent, confidentiality, potential for harm, results communication, examples of ethical failures, frequently asked questions about research ethics.

Research ethics matter for scientific integrity, human rights and dignity, and collaboration between science and society. These principles make sure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and safe for research subjects.

You’ll balance pursuing important research aims with using ethical research methods and procedures. It’s always necessary to prevent permanent or excessive harm to participants, whether inadvertent or not.

Defying research ethics will also lower the credibility of your research because it’s hard for others to trust your data if your methods are morally questionable.

Even if a research idea is valuable to society, it doesn’t justify violating the human rights or dignity of your study participants.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Before you start any study involving data collection with people, you’ll submit your research proposal to an institutional review board (IRB) .

An IRB is a committee that checks whether your research aims and research design are ethically acceptable and follow your institution’s code of conduct. They check that your research materials and procedures are up to code.

If successful, you’ll receive IRB approval, and you can begin collecting data according to the approved procedures. If you want to make any changes to your procedures or materials, you’ll need to submit a modification application to the IRB for approval.

If unsuccessful, you may be asked to re-submit with modifications or your research proposal may receive a rejection. To get IRB approval, it’s important to explicitly note how you’ll tackle each of the ethical issues that may arise in your study.

There are several ethical issues you should always pay attention to in your research design, and these issues can overlap with each other.

You’ll usually outline ways you’ll deal with each issue in your research proposal if you plan to collect data from participants.

Voluntary participation means that all research subjects are free to choose to participate without any pressure or coercion.

All participants are able to withdraw from, or leave, the study at any point without feeling an obligation to continue. Your participants don’t need to provide a reason for leaving the study.

It’s important to make it clear to participants that there are no negative consequences or repercussions to their refusal to participate. After all, they’re taking the time to help you in the research process, so you should respect their decisions without trying to change their minds.

Voluntary participation is an ethical principle protected by international law and many scientific codes of conduct.

Take special care to ensure there’s no pressure on participants when you’re working with vulnerable groups of people who may find it hard to stop the study even when they want to.

Informed consent refers to a situation in which all potential participants receive and understand all the information they need to decide whether they want to participate. This includes information about the study’s benefits, risks, funding, and institutional approval.

• What the study is about
• The risks and benefits of taking part
• How long the study will take
• Your supervisor’s contact information and the institution’s approval number

Usually, you’ll provide participants with a text for them to read and ask them if they have any questions. If they agree to participate, they can sign or initial the consent form. Note that this may not be sufficient for informed consent when you work with particularly vulnerable groups of people.

If you’re collecting data from people with low literacy, make sure to verbally explain the consent form to them before they agree to participate.

For participants with very limited English proficiency, you should always translate the study materials or work with an interpreter so they have all the information in their first language.

In research with children, you’ll often need informed permission for their participation from their parents or guardians. Although children cannot give informed consent, it’s best to also ask for their assent (agreement) to participate, depending on their age and maturity level.

Anonymity means that you don’t know who the participants are and you can’t link any individual participant to their data.

You can only guarantee anonymity by not collecting any personally identifying information – for example, names, phone numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, physical characteristics, photos, and videos.

In many cases, it may be impossible to truly anonymise data collection. For example, data collected in person or by phone cannot be considered fully anonymous because some personal identifiers (demographic information or phone numbers) are impossible to hide.

You’ll also need to collect some identifying information if you give your participants the option to withdraw their data at a later stage.

Data pseudonymisation is an alternative method where you replace identifying information about participants with pseudonymous, or fake, identifiers. The data can still be linked to participants, but it’s harder to do so because you separate personal information from the study data.

Confidentiality means that you know who the participants are, but you remove all identifying information from your report.

All participants have a right to privacy, so you should protect their personal data for as long as you store or use it. Even when you can’t collect data anonymously, you should secure confidentiality whenever you can.

Some research designs aren’t conducive to confidentiality, but it’s important to make all attempts and inform participants of the risks involved.

As a researcher, you have to consider all possible sources of harm to participants. Harm can come in many different forms.

• Psychological harm: Sensitive questions or tasks may trigger negative emotions such as shame or anxiety.
• Social harm: Participation can involve social risks, public embarrassment, or stigma.
• Physical harm: Pain or injury can result from the study procedures.
• Legal harm: Reporting sensitive data could lead to legal risks or a breach of privacy.

It’s best to consider every possible source of harm in your study, as well as concrete ways to mitigate them. Involve your supervisor to discuss steps for harm reduction.

Make sure to disclose all possible risks of harm to participants before the study to get informed consent. If there is a risk of harm, prepare to provide participants with resources, counselling, or medical services if needed.

Some of these questions may bring up negative emotions, so you inform participants about the sensitive nature of the survey and assure them that their responses will be confidential.

The way you communicate your research results can sometimes involve ethical issues. Good science communication is honest, reliable, and credible. It’s best to make your results as transparent as possible.

Take steps to actively avoid plagiarism and research misconduct wherever possible.

Plagiarism means submitting others’ works as your own. Although it can be unintentional, copying someone else’s work without proper credit amounts to stealing. It’s an ethical problem in research communication because you may benefit by harming other researchers.

Self-plagiarism is when you republish or re-submit parts of your own papers or reports without properly citing your original work.

This is problematic because you may benefit from presenting your ideas as new and original even though they’ve already been published elsewhere in the past. You may also be infringing on your previous publisher’s copyright, violating an ethical code, or wasting time and resources by doing so.

In extreme cases of self-plagiarism, entire datasets or papers are sometimes duplicated. These are major ethical violations because they can skew research findings if taken as original data.

You notice that two published studies have similar characteristics even though they are from different years. Their sample sizes, locations, treatments, and results are highly similar, and the studies share one author in common.

Research misconduct

Research misconduct means making up or falsifying data, manipulating data analyses, or misrepresenting results in research reports. It’s a form of academic fraud.

These actions are committed intentionally and can have serious consequences; research misconduct is not a simple mistake or a point of disagreement about data analyses.

Research misconduct is a serious ethical issue because it can undermine scientific integrity and institutional credibility. It leads to a waste of funding and resources that could have been used for alternative research.

Later investigations revealed that they fabricated and manipulated their data to show a nonexistent link between vaccines and autism. Wakefield also neglected to disclose important conflicts of interest, and his medical license was taken away.

This fraudulent work sparked vaccine hesitancy among parents and caregivers. The rate of MMR vaccinations in children fell sharply, and measles outbreaks became more common due to a lack of herd immunity.

Research scandals with ethical failures are littered throughout history, but some took place not that long ago.

Some scientists in positions of power have historically mistreated or even abused research participants to investigate research problems at any cost. These participants were prisoners, under their care, or otherwise trusted them to treat them with dignity.

To demonstrate the importance of research ethics, we’ll briefly review two research studies that violated human rights in modern history.

These experiments were inhumane and resulted in trauma, permanent disabilities, or death in many cases.

After some Nazi doctors were put on trial for their crimes, the Nuremberg Code of research ethics for human experimentation was developed in 1947 to establish a new standard for human experimentation in medical research.

In reality, the actual goal was to study the effects of the disease when left untreated, and the researchers never informed participants about their diagnoses or the research aims.

Although participants experienced severe health problems, including blindness and other complications, the researchers only pretended to provide medical care.

When treatment became possible in 1943, 11 years after the study began, none of the participants were offered it, despite their health conditions and high risk of death.

Ethical failures like these resulted in severe harm to participants, wasted resources, and lower trust in science and scientists. This is why all research institutions have strict ethical guidelines for performing research.

Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. These principles include voluntary participation, informed consent, anonymity, confidentiality, potential for harm, and results communication.

Scientists and researchers must always adhere to a certain code of conduct when collecting data from others .

These considerations protect the rights of research participants, enhance research validity , and maintain scientific integrity.

Research ethics matter for scientific integrity, human rights and dignity, and collaboration between science and society. These principles make sure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and safe.

Anonymity means you don’t know who the participants are, while confidentiality means you know who they are but remove identifying information from your research report. Both are important ethical considerations .

You can only guarantee anonymity by not collecting any personally identifying information – for example, names, phone numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, physical characteristics, photos, or videos.

You can keep data confidential by using aggregate information in your research report, so that you only refer to groups of participants rather than individuals.

These actions are committed intentionally and can have serious consequences; research misconduct is not a simple mistake or a point of disagreement but a serious ethical failure.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2024, July 05). Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/ethical-considerations/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples, data collection methods | step-by-step guide & examples, how to avoid plagiarism | tips on citing sources.

Ethical considerations in research: Best practices and examples

To conduct responsible research, you’ve got to think about ethics. They protect participants’ rights and their well-being - and they ensure your findings are valid and reliable. This isn’t just a box for you to tick. It’s a crucial consideration that can make all the difference to the outcome of your research.

In this article, we'll explore the meaning and importance of research ethics in today's research landscape. You'll learn best practices to conduct ethical and impactful research.

Examples of ethical considerations in research

As a researcher, you're responsible for ethical research alongside your organization. Fulfilling ethical guidelines is critical. Organizations must ensure employees follow best practices to protect participants' rights and well-being.

Keep these things in mind when it comes to ethical considerations in research:

Voluntary participation

Voluntary participation is key. Nobody should feel like they're being forced to participate or pressured into doing anything they don't want to. That means giving people a choice and the ability to opt out at any time, even if they've already agreed to take part in the study.

Informed consent

Informed consent isn't just an ethical consideration. It's a legal requirement as well. Participants must fully understand what they're agreeing to, including potential risks and benefits.

The best way to go about this is by using a consent form. Make sure you include:

• A brief description of the study and research methods.
• The potential benefits and risks of participating.
• The length of the study.
• Contact information for the researcher and/or sponsor.
• Reiteration of the participant’s right to withdraw from the research project at any time without penalty.

Anonymity means that participants aren't identifiable in any way. This includes:

• Email address
• Photographs
• Video footage

You need a way to anonymize research data so that it can't be traced back to individual participants. This may involve creating a new digital ID for participants that can’t be linked back to their original identity using numerical codes.

Confidentiality

Information gathered during a study must be kept confidential. Confidentiality helps to protect the privacy of research participants. It also ensures that their information isn't disclosed to unauthorized individuals.

Some ways to ensure confidentiality include:

• Using a secure server to store data.
• Removing identifying information from databases that contain sensitive data.
• Using a third-party company to process and manage research participant data.
• Not keeping participant records for longer than necessary.
• Avoiding discussion of research findings in public forums.

Potential for harm

​​The potential for harm is a crucial factor in deciding whether a research study should proceed. It can manifest in various forms, such as:

• Psychological harm
• Social harm
• Physical harm

Conduct an ethical review to identify possible harms. Be prepared to explain how you’ll minimize these harms and what support is available in case they do happen.

Fair payment

One of the most crucial aspects of setting up a research study is deciding on fair compensation for your participants. Underpayment is a common ethical issue that shouldn't be overlooked. Properly rewarding participants' time is critical for boosting engagement and obtaining high-quality data. While Prolific requires a minimum payment of £6.00 / $8.00 per hour, there are other factors you need to consider when deciding on a fair payment.

First, check your institution's reimbursement guidelines to see if they already have a minimum or maximum hourly rate. You can also use the national minimum wage as a reference point.

Next, think about the amount of work you're asking participants to do. The level of effort required for a task, such as producing a video recording versus a short survey, should correspond with the reward offered.

You also need to consider the population you're targeting. To attract research subjects with specific characteristics or high-paying jobs, you may need to offer more as an incentive.

We recommend a minimum payment of £9.00 / $12.00 per hour, but we understand that payment rates can vary depending on a range of factors. Whatever payment you choose should reflect the amount of effort participants are required to put in and be fair to everyone involved.

Ethical research made easy with Prolific

At Prolific, we believe in making ethical research easy and accessible. The findings from the Fairwork Cloudwork report speak for themselves. Prolific was given the top score out of all competitors for minimum standards of fair work.

With over 25,000 researchers in our community, we're leading the way in revolutionizing the research industry. If you're interested in learning more about how we can support your research journey, sign up to get started now.

You might also like

High-quality human data to deliver world-leading research and AIs.

Follow us on

All Rights Reserved Prolific 2024

• Translators
• Graphic Designers

Please enter the email address you used for your account. Your sign in information will be sent to your email address after it has been verified.

How to Write an Ethics Application That Gets Approved

Within any field of study, research is essential to collecting data. Data helps researchers draw conclusions about particular research questions which, in turn, can lead to further questions and hypotheses and, even better, potential answers to questions outlined in the research guide. In some instances, research may require participants. As such, it is essential to make sure that you submit a good ethics application that will increase the chances of your research being approved. Before we discuss the steps to writing a successful ethics application that gets approved, let us first define ethics.

Ethics deals with morals and principles. It is concerned with what is morally right versus what is morally wrong. Ethics is applied to not only research questions and proposals but also to everyday life.

Some examples of ethical dilemmas include:

• You find a wallet on a train seat next to you. Do you keep the wallet and its contents, or do you turn it in at the train station lost and found?
• You did not study for your math exam, but one of your friends has acquired the answer sheet and offers it to you. Do you use the answer sheet and cheat on the exam, or do you decline the offer and report your friend for cheating?
• You want to conduct an experiment involving human participants, but you know that there are potential risks involved in the experiment. Do you tell the participants the potential risks before you begin the experiment, or do you continue with the experiment with the risks involved?

In your case, you are most likely seeking ethical approval from an ethics committee so that you can perform an experiment. This experiment may involve other researchers and participants, so it is necessary for an ethics committee to review and approve of your experiment before you begin. In order to have your application approved, there are several steps you must take in completing your application.

Factors that will increase your application's chances of being approved

Clearly outline and define your research proposal.

Part of your ethics application is to explain your study. This is an opportunity for you to explicitly outline what your research proposal is and the procedures that will be involved in the research. It is important to be completely transparent and to include every step of your procedure. The ethics committee will be analyzing the details and assessing the risks involved in your study. To avoid your research proposal being rejected or delayed in the reviewal process, ensure that you have included all of the necessary information.

This is also your time to justify your research proposal, explaining why it matters and what benefits the research could potentially have for your field. An ethics committee is going to determine whether the potential risks will outweigh the potential benefits of your experiment. Therefore, be sure to outline who and what will benefit from your findings, but take care to not exaggerate, as honesty is important when submitting your application for review. Exaggeration of the truth could lead to potential harm down the road. Some potential questions to answer include:

• Who will be involved in the study, including participants and researchers?
• Were all of the participants and researchers involved in your study informed of the contents and risks of your study, and did they voluntarily consent to take part in your study?
• What techniques and methods will you be using to gather your data?
• Why are you gathering this particular data?
• How will you use this data in your study?
• Who will have access to the study data?

Use plain language

There is a lot of information to include in an ethics application, and it is unlikely that everybody who reads your application will be an expert in your field. Therefore, you should never assume language that is commonly used in your field of study is easily accessible to everyone else. For example, if you are writing an ethics application that is based in a STEM field, complicated scientific terms or acronyms may not be immediately recognized or understood by application reviewers.

To avoid potential confusion, you should always use clear, simple language to describe and define your study. In doing this, the ethics committee can read and understand your work clearly. It is also essential to do this when gaining consent from your participants so they are fully informed about their role in the study. Using simple language will also decrease the application and reviewal process time.

Acquire informed consent from participants

This step will come before you submit your ethics application to the ethics committee, but it is one of the most essential steps in the application process. Any and all potential harm that could be done to participants needs to be explicitly outlined. If you do not acquire informed, voluntary consent from your participants, then your ethics application will be rejected because there is a possibility of harm being done to your participants.

For example, the famous Milgram experiment was a topic of ethical debate after it was released. The social psychology experiment had two groups of participants. The student group was informed they were going to be shocked by the teacher group, but the shock was fake and did not cause any actual harm. However, the teacher group was not informed of this, and teacher participants believed that they were actually eliciting shocks to students. This caused serious psychological harm to teacher participants once the experiment was over and the truth was revealed, making this an unethical research experiment. So, before you submit your ethics application, consider the following:

• Do your participants know all of the potential risks involved in participating in your study?
• Are you prioritizing the physical and mental well-being of your participants in the study?

Identify any and all potential risks

As we just discussed, gathering informed consent from participants is essential to getting approval from the ethics committee. This includes educating your participants on the potential risks that they may face throughout the study. As such, we are now going to discuss what you should be thinking about in terms of assessing risk. Since the ethics committee is going to evaluate how many potential risks are involved in your study, complete transparency is necessary. This includes any risk that could be done to you, your fellow researchers, and your participants. The ethics committee is also going to look to see how you are working to minimize those risks. As such, it is important for you to have plans in place to combat anything that may go wrong in your study. Below, we have provided questions to ask yourself as you prepare your ethics application.

Risks to yourself

• Are there any risks in the experiment that are unique to you?
• Are there any risks involved with the location or setup of the experiment?
• Will any part of the experiment cause you physical or mental harm?
• Are you taking steps to minimize the risks to yourself?
• What plans do you have in place if you are negatively affected during the experiment?

Risks to your research team

• Have you informed your researchers of the procedure and the potential risks that they may face? Remember, informed consent does not just apply to the participants, but it also extends to anyone else involved in the experiment, including fellow researchers.
• Will your research team face any risks that are unique to them?
• Is the experiment environment safe and secure for your researchers?
• Does your research team have plans to combat potential harm if something unexpectedly goes wrong?
• Are you respecting the researchers' privacy?

Risks to your participants

• Are you protecting the privacy of your participants?
• Is there any equipment or method that could potentially cause mental or physical harm to your participants?
• Are they aware they can withdraw from the study at any time, no explanation needed?
• Do the participants know how their involvement is affecting the experiment?
• How will you protect your participants if they are exposed to risks? Are you prepared to lose participants or accommodate their needs?

Other things to consider

Although we have outlined and discussed the most essential information to include in your ethics application, there are some other factors you will want to consider and address in your application. Doing this the first time you submit your ethics application will make for a quicker and more efficient application review process, as the ethics committee will not have to send your application back asking for more information. Here are some other things to consider in your ethics application:

• How will everyone involved in the study get to the research location? This may not be the first thing you think of, but it should be considered when you are reviewing costs and transportation for your study.
• Are there any outside parties that could be negatively affected by your experiment, mentally or physically?

Final review

Once you think you have included the necessary information in your ethics application, it is time for you to review your materials. You should review your materials carefully and take on a critical eye, putting yourself in the shoes of an ethics committee member. Consider the following as you finalize your application:

• Is there any other information you can think of that a committee member might want to know, or have you included everything?
• Are you using plain, easily understood language?
• Are you being clear and concise, or is there room for improvement?
• Are you consistent in your application, ensuring that you have outlined a clear procedure?
• Have you considered the potential risks involved in your experiment and created potential solutions to any problems that may arise?
• Are you being honest? Honesty and transparency are key to writing a good ethics application that will get approved.

Were you able to check off every question on the list? If so, then you are ready to send your ethics application to the committee. Approval can be a long and sometimes difficult process, but if you have followed our advice, then your process should be simpler and, hopefully, easier. Congratulations, you are one step further in achieving your research goals!

Header photo by Markus Winkler

A guide to ethical considerations in research

Last updated

12 March 2023

Reviewed by

Miroslav Damyanov

Whether you are conducting a survey, running focus groups , doing field research, or holding interviews, the chances are participants will be a part of the process.

Taking ethical considerations into account and following all obligations are essential when people are involved in your research. Upholding academic integrity is another crucial ethical concern in all research types. 

So, how can you protect your participants and ensure that your research is ethical? Let’s take a closer look at the ethical considerations in research and the best practices to follow.

Make research less tedious

Dovetail streamlines research to help you uncover and share actionable insights

• The importance of ethical research

Research ethics are integral to all forms of research. They help protect participants’ rights, ensure that the research is valid and accurate, and help minimize any risk of harm during the process.

When people are involved in your research, it’s particularly important to consider whether your planned research method follows ethical practices.

You might ask questions such as:

Will our participants be protected?

Is there a risk of any harm?

Are we doing all we can to protect the personal data and information we collect?

Does our study include any bias?

How can we ensure that the results will be accurate and valid?

Will our research impact public safety?

Is there a more ethical way to complete the research?

Conducting research unethically and not protecting participants’ rights can have serious consequences. It can discredit the entire study. Human rights, dignity, and research integrity should all be front of mind when you are conducting research.

• How to conduct ethical research

Before kicking off any project, the entire team must be familiar with ethical best practices. These include the considerations below.

Voluntary participation

In an ethical study, all participants have chosen to be part of the research. They must have voluntarily opted in without any pressure or coercion to do so. They must be aware that they are part of a research study. Their information must not be used against their will. 

To ensure voluntary participation, make it clear at the outset that the person is opting into the process.

While participants may agree to be part of a study for a certain duration, they are allowed to change their minds. Participants must be free to leave or withdraw from the study at any time. They don’t need to give a reason.

Informed consent

Before kicking off any research, it’s also important to gain consent from all participants. This ensures participants are clear that they are part of a research study and understand all of the information related to it.

Gaining informed consent usually involves a written consent form—physical or digital—that participants can sign.

Best practice informed consent generally includes the following:

An explanation of what the study is

The duration of the study

The expectations of participants

Any potential risks

An explanation that participants are free to withdraw at any time

Contact information for the research supervisor

When obtaining informed consent, you should ensure that all parties truly understand what they are signing and their obligations as a participant. There should never be any coercion to sign.

Anonymity is key to ensuring that participants cannot be identified through their data. Personal information includes things like participants’ names, addresses, emails, phone numbers, characteristics, and photos.

However, making information truly anonymous can be challenging, especially if personal information is a necessary part of the research.

To maintain a degree of anonymity, avoid gathering any information you don’t need. This will minimize the risk of participants being identified.

Another useful tool is data pseudonymization, which makes it harder to directly link information to a real person. Data pseudonymization means giving participants fake names or mock information to protect their identity. You could, for example, replace participants’ names with codes.

Confidentiality

Keeping data confidential is a critical aspect of all forms of research. You should communicate to all participants that their information will be protected and then take active steps to ensure that happens.

Data protection has become a serious topic in recent years and should be taken seriously. The more information you gather, the more important it is to heavily protect that data.

There are many ways to protect data, including the following:

Restricted access: Information should only be accessible to the researchers involved in the project to limit the risk of breaches.

Password protection : Information should not be accessible without access via a password that complies with secure password guidelines.

Encrypted data: In this day and age, password protection isn’t usually sufficient. Encrypting the data can help ensure its security.

Data retention: All organizations should uphold a data retention policy whereby data gathered should only be held for a certain period of time. This minimizes the risk of breaches further down the line.

In research where participants are grouped together (such as in focus groups), ask participants not to pass on what has been discussed. This helps maintain the group’s privacy.

Data falsification

Regardless of what your study is about or whether it involves humans, it’s always unethical to falsify data or information. That means editing or changing any data that has been gathered or gathering data in ways that skew the results.

Bias in research is highly problematic and can significantly impact research integrity. Data falsification or misrepresentation can have serious consequences.

Take the case of Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk, for example. Woo-suk, once considered a scientific leader in stem-cell research, was found guilty of fabricating experiments in the field and making ethical violations. Once discovered, he was fired from his role and sentenced to two years in prison.

All conflicts of interest should be declared at the outset to avoid any bias or risk of fabrication in the research process. Data must be collected and recorded accurately, and analysis must be completed impartially.

If conflicts do arise during the study, researchers may need to step back to maintain the study’s integrity. Outsourcing research to neutral third parties is necessary in some cases.

Potential for harm

Another consideration is the potential for harm. When completing research, it’s important to ensure that your participants will be safe throughout the study’s duration. 

Harm during research could occur in many forms.

Physical harm may occur if your participants are asked to perform a physical activity, or if they are involved in a medical study.

Psychological harm can occur if questions or activities involve triggering or sensitive topics, or if participants are asked to complete potentially embarrassing tasks.

Harm can be caused through a data breach or privacy concern.

A study can cause harm if the participants don’t feel comfortable with the study expectations or their supervisors.

Maintaining the physical and mental well-being of all participants throughout studies is an essential aspect of ethical research.

• Gaining ethical approval

Gaining ethical approval may be necessary before conducting some types of research. 

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advise that approval is likely required for studies involving people.

To gain approval, it’s necessary to submit a proposal to an Institutional Review Board (IRB). The board will check the proposal and ensure that the research aligns with ethical practices. It will allow the project to proceed if it meets requirements.

Not gaining appropriate approval could invalidate your study, so it’s essential to pay attention to all local guidelines and laws.

• The dangers of unethical practices

Not maintaining ethical standards in research isn’t just questionable—it can be dangerous too. Many historical cases show just how widespread the ramifications can be.

The case of Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk shows just how critical it is to obtain information ethically and accurately represent findings.

A case in 1998, which involved fraudulent data reporting, further proves this point.

The study, now debunked, was completed by Andrew Wakefield. It suggested there may be a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in children. It was later found that the data was manipulated to show a causal link when there wasn’t one. Wakefield’s medical license was removed as a result, but the fraudulent study was still widely cited and continues to cause vaccine hesitancy among many parents.

Large organizational bodies have also been a part of unethical research. The alcohol industry, for example, was found to be highly influential in a major public health study in an attempt to prove that moderate alcohol consumption had health benefits. Five major alcohol companies pledged approximately $66 million to fund the study.

However, the World Health Organization (WHO) is clear that research shows there is no safe level of alcohol consumption. After pressure from many organizations, the study was eventually pulled due to biasing by the alcohol industry. Despite this, the idea that moderate alcohol consumption is better than abstaining may still appear in public discourse.

In more extreme cases, unethical research has led to medical studies being completed on people without their knowledge and against their will. The atrocities committed in Nazi Germany during World War II are an example.

Unethical practices in research are not just problematic or in conflict with academic integrity; they can seriously harm public health and safety.

• The ethical way to research

Considering ethical concerns and adopting best practices throughout studies is essential when conducting research.

When people are involved in studies, it’s important to consider their rights. They must not be coerced into participating, and they should be protected throughout the process.

Accurate reporting, unbiased results, and a genuine interest in answering questions rather than confirming assumptions are all essential aspects of ethical research.

Ethical research ultimately means producing true and valuable results for the benefit of everyone impacted by your study.

What are ethical considerations in research?

Ethical research involves a series of guidelines and considerations to ensure that the information gathered is valid and reliable. These guidelines ensure that:

People are not harmed during research

Participants have data protection and anonymity

Academic integrity is upheld

Not maintaining ethics in research can have serious consequences for those involved in the studies, the broader public, and policymakers.

What are the most common ethical considerations?

To maintain integrity and validity in research, all biases must be removed, data should be reported accurately, and studies must be clearly represented.

Some of the most common ethical guidelines when it comes to humans in research include avoiding harm, data protection, anonymity, informed consent, and confidentiality.

What are the ethical issues in secondary research?

Using secondary data is generally considered an ethical practice. That’s because the use of secondary data minimizes the impact on participants, reduces the need for additional funding, and maximizes the value of the data collection.

However, secondary research still has risks. For example, the risk of data breaches increases as more parties gain access to the information.

To minimize the risk, researchers should consider anonymity or data pseudonymization before the data is passed on. Furthermore, using the data should not cause any harm or distress to participants.

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 22 August 2024

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 August 2024

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

What Are the Ethical Considerations in Research Design?

When I began my work on the thesis I was always focused on my research. However, once I began to make my way through research, I realized that research ethics is a core aspect of the research work and the foundation of research design.

Research ethics play a crucial role in ensuring the responsible conduct of research. Here are some key reasons why research ethics matter:

Let us look into some of the major ethical considerations in research design.

Ethical Issues in Research

There are many organizations, like the Committee on Publication Ethics , dedicated to promoting ethics in scientific research. These organizations agree that ethics is not an afterthought or side note to the research study. It is an integral aspect of research that needs to remain at the forefront of our work.

The research design must address specific research questions. Hence, the conclusions of the study must correlate to the questions posed and the results. Also, research ethics demands that the methods used must relate specifically to the research questions.

Voluntary Participation and Consent

An individual should at no point feel any coercion to participate in a study. This includes any type of persuasion or deception in attempting to gain an individual’s trust.

Informed consent states that an individual must give their explicit consent to participate in the study. You can think of consent form as an agreement of trust between the researcher and the participants.

Sampling is the first step in research design . You will need to explain why you want a particular group of participants. You will have to explain why you left out certain people or groups. In addition, if your sample includes children or special needs individuals, you will have additional requirements to address like parental permission.

Confidentiality

The third ethics principle of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) states that: “The confidentiality of the information supplied by research subjects and the anonymity of respondents must be respected.” However, sometimes confidentiality is limited. For example, if a participant is at risk of harm, we must protect them. This might require releasing confidential information.

Risk of Harm

We should do everything in our power to protect study participants. For this, we should focus on the risk to benefit ratio. If possible risks outweigh the benefits, then we should abandon or redesign the study. Risk of harm also requires us to measure the risk to benefit ratio as the study progresses.

Research Methods

We know there are numerous research methods. However, when it comes to ethical considerations, some key questions can help us find the right approach for our studies.

i. Which methods most effectively fit the aims of your research?

ii. What are the strengths and restrictions of a particular method?

iii. Are there potential risks when using a particular research method?

For more guidance, you can refer to the ESRC Framework for Research Ethics .

Ethical issues in research can arise at various stages of the research process and involve different aspects of the study. Here are some common examples of ethical issues in research:

Institutional Review Boards

The importance of ethics in research cannot be understated. Following ethical guidelines will ensure your study’s validity and promote its contribution to scientific study. On a personal level, you will strengthen your research and increase your opportunities to gain funding.

To address the need for ethical considerations, most institutions have their own Institutional Review Board (IRB). An IRB secures the safety of human participants and prevents violation of human rights. It reviews the research aims and methodologies to ensure ethical practices are followed. If a research design does not follow the set ethical guidelines, then the  researcher will have to amend their study.

Applying for Ethical Approval

Applications for ethical approval will differ across institutions. Regardless, they focus on the benefits of your research and the risk to benefit ratio concerning participants. Therefore, you need to effectively address both in order to get ethical clearence.

Participants

It is vital that you make it clear that individuals are provided with sufficient information in order to make an informed decision on their participation. In addition, you need to demonstrate that the ethical issues of consent, risk of harm, and confidentiality are clearly defined.

Benefits of the Study

You need to prove to the panel that your work is essential and will yield results that contribute to the scientific community. For this, you should demonstrate the following:

i. The conduct of research guarantees the quality and integrity of results.

ii. The research will be properly distributed.

iii. The aims of the research are clear and the methodology is appropriate.

Integrity and transparency are vital in the research. Ethics committees expect you to share any actual or potential conflicts of interest that could affect your work. In addition, you have to be honest and transparent throughout the approval process and the research process.

The Dangers of Unethical Practices

There is a reason to  follow ethical guidelines. Without these guidelines, our research will suffer. Moreover, more importantly, people could suffer.

The following are just two examples of infamous cases of unethical research practices that demonstrate the importance of adhering to ethical standards:

• The Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) aimed to investigate the psychological effects of power using the relationship between prisoners and prison officers. Those assigned the role of “prison officers” embraced measures that exposed “prisoners” to psychological and physical harm. In this case, there was voluntary participation. However, there was disregard for  welfare of the participants.
• Recently, Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced his work on genetically edited babies . Over 100 Chinese scientists denounced this research, calling it “crazy” and “shocking and unacceptable.” This research shows a troubling attitude of “do first, debate later” and a disregard for the ethical concerns of manipulating the human body Wang Yuedan, a professor of immunology at Peking University, calls this “an ethics disaster for the world” and demands strict punishments for this type of ethics violation.

What are your experiences with research ethics? How have you developed an ethical approach to research design? Please share your thoughts with us in the comments section below.

I love the articulation of reasoning and practical examples of unethical research

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

• AI in Academia
• Trending Now

6 Leading AI Detection Tools for Academic Writing — A comparative analysis

The advent of AI content generators, exemplified by advanced models like ChatGPT, Claude AI, and…

• Reporting Research

Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for data interpretation

In research, choosing the right approach to understand data is crucial for deriving meaningful insights.…

• Industry News

China’s Ministry of Education Spearheads Efforts to Uphold Academic Integrity

In response to the increase in retractions of research papers submitted by Chinese scholars to…

Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right approach

The process of choosing the right research design can put ourselves at the crossroads of…

• Publishing Research
• Understanding Ethics

Understanding the Difference Between Research Ethics and Compliance

Ethics refers to the principles, values, and moral guidelines that guide individual or group behavior…

Unlocking the Power of Networking in Academic Conferences

Avoiding the AI Trap: Pitfalls of relying on ChatGPT for PhD applications

10 Ways to Help Students Restore Focus on Learning

Switching Your Major As a Researcher: Things to Consider Before Making the Decision

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

• 2000+ blog articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• 50+ Infographics
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

• Promoting Research
• Career Corner
• Diversity and Inclusion
• Infographics
• Expert Video Library
• Other Resources
• Enago Learn
• Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
• Peer Review Week 2024
• Open Access Week 2023
• Conference Videos
• Enago Report
• Journal Finder
• Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
• Editing Services
• Publication Support Services
• Research Impact
• Translation Services
• Publication solutions
• AI-Based Solutions
• Thought Leadership
• Call for Articles
• Call for Speakers
• Author Training
• Edit Profile

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

In your opinion, what is the most effective way to improve integrity in the peer review process?

How To Write A Research Proposal

A Straightforward How-To Guide (With Examples)

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | August 2019 (Updated April 2023)

Writing up a strong research proposal for a dissertation or thesis is much like a marriage proposal. It’s a task that calls on you to win somebody over and persuade them that what you’re planning is a great idea. An idea they’re happy to say ‘yes’ to. This means that your dissertation proposal needs to be   persuasive ,   attractive   and well-planned. In this post, I’ll show you how to write a winning dissertation proposal, from scratch.

Before you start:

– Understand exactly what a research proposal is – Ask yourself these 4 questions

The 5 essential ingredients:

• The title/topic
• The introduction chapter
• The scope/delimitations
• Preliminary literature review
• Design/ methodology
• Practical considerations and risks 

What Is A Research Proposal?

The research proposal is literally that: a written document that communicates what you propose to research, in a concise format. It’s where you put all that stuff that’s spinning around in your head down on to paper, in a logical, convincing fashion.

Convincing   is the keyword here, as your research proposal needs to convince the assessor that your research is   clearly articulated   (i.e., a clear research question) ,   worth doing   (i.e., is unique and valuable enough to justify the effort), and   doable   within the restrictions you’ll face (time limits, budget, skill limits, etc.). If your proposal does not address these three criteria, your research won’t be approved, no matter how “exciting” the research idea might be.

PS – if you’re completely new to proposal writing, we’ve got a detailed walkthrough video covering two successful research proposals here . 

How do I know I’m ready?

Before starting the writing process, you need to   ask yourself 4 important questions .  If you can’t answer them succinctly and confidently, you’re not ready – you need to go back and think more deeply about your dissertation topic .

You should be able to answer the following 4 questions before starting your dissertation or thesis research proposal:

• WHAT is my main research question? (the topic)
• WHO cares and why is this important? (the justification)
• WHAT data would I need to answer this question, and how will I analyse it? (the research design)
• HOW will I manage the completion of this research, within the given timelines? (project and risk management)

If you can’t answer these questions clearly and concisely,   you’re not yet ready   to write your research proposal – revisit our   post on choosing a topic .

If you can, that’s great – it’s time to start writing up your dissertation proposal. Next, I’ll discuss what needs to go into your research proposal, and how to structure it all into an intuitive, convincing document with a linear narrative.

The 5 Essential Ingredients

Research proposals can vary in style between institutions and disciplines, but here I’ll share with you a   handy 5-section structure   you can use. These 5 sections directly address the core questions we spoke about earlier, ensuring that you present a convincing proposal. If your institution already provides a proposal template, there will likely be substantial overlap with this, so you’ll still get value from reading on.

For each section discussed below, make sure you use headers and sub-headers (ideally, numbered headers) to help the reader navigate through your document, and to support them when they need to revisit a previous section. Don’t just present an endless wall of text, paragraph after paragraph after paragraph…

Top Tip:   Use MS Word Styles to format headings. This will allow you to be clear about whether a sub-heading is level 2, 3, or 4. Additionally, you can view your document in ‘outline view’ which will show you only your headings. This makes it much easier to check your structure, shift things around and make decisions about where a section needs to sit. You can also generate a 100% accurate table of contents using Word’s automatic functionality.

Ingredient #1 – Topic/Title Header

Your research proposal’s title should be your main research question in its simplest form, possibly with a sub-heading providing basic details on the specifics of the study. For example:

“Compliance with equality legislation in the charity sector: a study of the ‘reasonable adjustments’ made in three London care homes”

As you can see, this title provides a clear indication of what the research is about, in broad terms. It paints a high-level picture for the first-time reader, which gives them a taste of what to expect.   Always aim for a clear, concise title . Don’t feel the need to capture every detail of your research in your title – your proposal will fill in the gaps.

Need a helping hand?

Ingredient #2 – Introduction

In this section of your research proposal, you’ll expand on what you’ve communicated in the title, by providing a few paragraphs which offer more detail about your research topic. Importantly, the focus here is the   topic   – what will you research and why is that worth researching? This is not the place to discuss methodology, practicalities, etc. – you’ll do that later.

You should cover the following:

• An overview of the   broad area   you’ll be researching – introduce the reader to key concepts and language
• An explanation of the   specific (narrower) area   you’ll be focusing, and why you’ll be focusing there
• Your research   aims   and   objectives
• Your   research question (s) and sub-questions (if applicable)

Importantly, you should aim to use short sentences and plain language – don’t babble on with extensive jargon, acronyms and complex language. Assume that the reader is an intelligent layman – not a subject area specialist (even if they are). Remember that the   best writing is writing that can be easily understood   and digested. Keep it simple.

Note that some universities may want some extra bits and pieces in your introduction section. For example, personal development objectives, a structural outline, etc. Check your brief to see if there are any other details they expect in your proposal, and make sure you find a place for these.

Ingredient #3 – Scope

Next, you’ll need to specify what the scope of your research will be – this is also known as the delimitations . In other words, you need to make it clear what you will be covering and, more importantly, what you won’t be covering in your research. Simply put, this is about ring fencing your research topic so that you have a laser-sharp focus.

All too often, students feel the need to go broad and try to address as many issues as possible, in the interest of producing comprehensive research. Whilst this is admirable, it’s a mistake. By tightly refining your scope, you’ll enable yourself to   go deep   with your research, which is what you need to earn good marks. If your scope is too broad, you’re likely going to land up with superficial research (which won’t earn marks), so don’t be afraid to narrow things down.

Ingredient #4 – Literature Review

In this section of your research proposal, you need to provide a (relatively) brief discussion of the existing literature. Naturally, this will not be as comprehensive as the literature review in your actual dissertation, but it will lay the foundation for that. In fact, if you put in the effort at this stage, you’ll make your life a lot easier when it’s time to write your actual literature review chapter.

There are a few things you need to achieve in this section:

• Demonstrate that you’ve done your reading and are   familiar with the current state of the research   in your topic area.
• Show that   there’s a clear gap   for your specific research – i.e., show that your topic is sufficiently unique and will add value to the existing research.
• Show how the existing research has shaped your thinking regarding   research design . For example, you might use scales or questionnaires from previous studies.

When you write up your literature review, keep these three objectives front of mind, especially number two (revealing the gap in the literature), so that your literature review has a   clear purpose and direction . Everything you write should be contributing towards one (or more) of these objectives in some way. If it doesn’t, you need to ask yourself whether it’s truly needed.

Top Tip:  Don’t fall into the trap of just describing the main pieces of literature, for example, “A says this, B says that, C also says that…” and so on. Merely describing the literature provides no value. Instead, you need to   synthesise   it, and use it to address the three objectives above.

Ingredient #5 – Research Methodology

Now that you’ve clearly explained both your intended research topic (in the introduction) and the existing research it will draw on (in the literature review section), it’s time to get practical and explain exactly how you’ll be carrying out your own research. In other words, your research methodology.

In this section, you’ll need to   answer two critical questions :

• How   will you design your research? I.e., what research methodology will you adopt, what will your sample be, how will you collect data, etc.
• Why   have you chosen this design? I.e., why does this approach suit your specific research aims, objectives and questions?

In other words, this is not just about explaining WHAT you’ll be doing, it’s also about explaining WHY. In fact, the   justification is the most important part , because that justification is how you demonstrate a good understanding of research design (which is what assessors want to see).

Some essential design choices you need to cover in your research proposal include:

• Your intended research philosophy (e.g., positivism, interpretivism or pragmatism )
• What methodological approach you’ll be taking (e.g., qualitative , quantitative or mixed )
• The details of your sample (e.g., sample size, who they are, who they represent, etc.)
• What data you plan to collect (i.e. data about what, in what form?)
• How you plan to collect it (e.g., surveys , interviews , focus groups, etc.)
• How you plan to analyse it (e.g., regression analysis, thematic analysis , etc.)
• Ethical adherence (i.e., does this research satisfy all ethical requirements of your institution, or does it need further approval?)

This list is not exhaustive – these are just some core attributes of research design. Check with your institution what level of detail they expect. The “ research onion ” by Saunders et al (2009) provides a good summary of the various design choices you ultimately need to make – you can   read more about that here .

Don’t forget the practicalities…

In addition to the technical aspects, you will need to address the   practical   side of the project. In other words, you need to explain   what resources you’ll need   (e.g., time, money, access to equipment or software, etc.) and how you intend to secure these resources. You need to show that your project is feasible, so any “make or break” type resources need to already be secured. The success or failure of your project cannot depend on some resource which you’re not yet sure you have access to.

Another part of the practicalities discussion is   project and risk management . In other words, you need to show that you have a clear project plan to tackle your research with. Some key questions to address:

• What are the timelines for each phase of your project?
• Are the time allocations reasonable?
• What happens if something takes longer than anticipated (risk management)?
• What happens if you don’t get the response rate you expect?

A good way to demonstrate that you’ve thought this through is to include a Gantt chart and a risk register (in the appendix if word count is a problem). With these two tools, you can show that you’ve got a clear, feasible plan, and you’ve thought about and accounted for the potential risks.

Tip – Be honest about the potential difficulties – but show that you are anticipating solutions and workarounds. This is much more impressive to an assessor than an unrealistically optimistic proposal which does not anticipate any challenges whatsoever.

Final Touches: Read And Simplify

The final step is to edit and proofread your proposal – very carefully. It sounds obvious, but all too often poor editing and proofreading ruin a good proposal. Nothing is more off-putting for an assessor than a poorly edited, typo-strewn document. It sends the message that you either do not pay attention to detail, or just don’t care. Neither of these are good messages. Put the effort into editing and proofreading your proposal (or pay someone to do it for you) – it will pay dividends.

When you’re editing, watch out for ‘academese’. Many students can speak simply, passionately and clearly about their dissertation topic – but become incomprehensible the moment they turn the laptop on. You are not required to write in any kind of special, formal, complex language when you write academic work. Sure, there may be technical terms, jargon specific to your discipline, shorthand terms and so on. But, apart from those,   keep your written language very close to natural spoken language   – just as you would speak in the classroom. Imagine that you are explaining your project plans to your classmates or a family member. Remember, write for the intelligent layman, not the subject matter experts. Plain-language, concise writing is what wins hearts and minds – and marks!

Let’s Recap: Research Proposal 101

And there you have it – how to write your dissertation or thesis research proposal, from the title page to the final proof. Here’s a quick recap of the key takeaways:

• The purpose of the research proposal is to   convince   – therefore, you need to make a clear, concise argument of why your research is both worth doing and doable.
• Make sure you can ask the critical what, who, and how questions of your research   before   you put pen to paper.
• Title – provides the first taste of your research, in broad terms
• Introduction – explains what you’ll be researching in more detail
• Scope – explains the boundaries of your research
• Literature review – explains how your research fits into the existing research and why it’s unique and valuable
• Research methodology – explains and justifies how you will carry out your own research

Hopefully, this post has helped you better understand how to write up a winning research proposal. If you enjoyed it, be sure to check out the rest of the Grad Coach Blog . If your university doesn’t provide any template for your proposal, you might want to try out our free research proposal template .

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Research Proposal Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

30 Comments

Thank you so much for the valuable insight that you have given, especially on the research proposal. That is what I have managed to cover. I still need to go back to the other parts as I got disturbed while still listening to Derek’s audio on you-tube. I am inspired. I will definitely continue with Grad-coach guidance on You-tube.

Thanks for the kind words :). All the best with your proposal.

First of all, thanks a lot for making such a wonderful presentation. The video was really useful and gave me a very clear insight of how a research proposal has to be written. I shall try implementing these ideas in my RP.

Once again, I thank you for this content.

I found reading your outline on writing research proposal very beneficial. I wish there was a way of submitting my draft proposal to you guys for critiquing before I submit to the institution.

Hi Bonginkosi

Thank you for the kind words. Yes, we do provide a review service. The best starting point is to have a chat with one of our coaches here: https://gradcoach.com/book/new/ .

Hello team GRADCOACH, may God bless you so much. I was totally green in research. Am so happy for your free superb tutorials and resources. Once again thank you so much Derek and his team.

You’re welcome, Erick. Good luck with your research proposal 🙂

thank you for the information. its precise and on point.

Really a remarkable piece of writing and great source of guidance for the researchers. GOD BLESS YOU for your guidance. Regards

Thanks so much for your guidance. It is easy and comprehensive the way you explain the steps for a winning research proposal.

Thank you guys so much for the rich post. I enjoyed and learn from every word in it. My problem now is how to get into your platform wherein I can always seek help on things related to my research work ? Secondly, I wish to find out if there is a way I can send my tentative proposal to you guys for examination before I take to my supervisor Once again thanks very much for the insights

Thanks for your kind words, Desire.

If you are based in a country where Grad Coach’s paid services are available, you can book a consultation by clicking the “Book” button in the top right.

Best of luck with your studies.

May God bless you team for the wonderful work you are doing,

If I have a topic, Can I submit it to you so that you can draft a proposal for me?? As I am expecting to go for masters degree in the near future.

Thanks for your comment. We definitely cannot draft a proposal for you, as that would constitute academic misconduct. The proposal needs to be your own work. We can coach you through the process, but it needs to be your own work and your own writing.

Best of luck with your research!

I found a lot of many essential concepts from your material. it is real a road map to write a research proposal. so thanks a lot. If there is any update material on your hand on MBA please forward to me.

GradCoach is a professional website that presents support and helps for MBA student like me through the useful online information on the page and with my 1-on-1 online coaching with the amazing and professional PhD Kerryen.

Thank you Kerryen so much for the support and help 🙂

I really recommend dealing with such a reliable services provider like Gradcoah and a coach like Kerryen.

Hi, Am happy for your service and effort to help students and researchers, Please, i have been given an assignment on research for strategic development, the task one is to formulate a research proposal to support the strategic development of a business area, my issue here is how to go about it, especially the topic or title and introduction. Please, i would like to know if you could help me and how much is the charge.

This content is practical, valuable, and just great!

Thank you very much!

Hi Derek, Thank you for the valuable presentation. It is very helpful especially for beginners like me. I am just starting my PhD.

This is quite instructive and research proposal made simple. Can I have a research proposal template?

Great! Thanks for rescuing me, because I had no former knowledge in this topic. But with this piece of information, I am now secured. Thank you once more.

I enjoyed listening to your video on how to write a proposal. I think I will be able to write a winning proposal with your advice. I wish you were to be my supervisor.

Dear Derek Jansen,

Thank you for your great content. I couldn’t learn these topics in MBA, but now I learned from GradCoach. Really appreciate your efforts….

From Afghanistan!

I have got very essential inputs for startup of my dissertation proposal. Well organized properly communicated with video presentation. Thank you for the presentation.

Wow, this is absolutely amazing guys. Thank you so much for the fruitful presentation, you’ve made my research much easier.

this helps me a lot. thank you all so much for impacting in us. may god richly bless you all

How I wish I’d learn about Grad Coach earlier. I’ve been stumbling around writing and rewriting! Now I have concise clear directions on how to put this thing together. Thank you!

Fantastic!! Thank You for this very concise yet comprehensive guidance.

Even if I am poor in English I would like to thank you very much.

Thank you very much, this is very insightful.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations can be specified as one of the most important parts of the research. Dissertations may even be doomed to failure if this part is missing.

According to Bryman and Bell (2007) [1] the following ten points represent the most important principles related to ethical considerations in dissertations:

• Research participants should not be subjected to harm in any ways whatsoever.
• Respect for the dignity of research participants should be prioritised.
• Full consent should be obtained from the participants prior to the study.
• The protection of the privacy of research participants has to be ensured.
• Adequate level of confidentiality of the research data should be ensured.
• Anonymity of individuals and organisations participating in the research has to be ensured.
• Any deception or exaggeration about the aims and objectives of the research must be avoided.
• Affiliations in any forms, sources of funding, as well as any possible conflicts of interests have to be declared.
• Any type of communication in relation to the research should be done with honesty and transparency.
• Any type of misleading information, as well as representation of primary data findings in a biased way must be avoided.

In order to address ethical considerations aspect of your dissertation in an effective manner, you will need to expand discussions of each of the following points to at least one paragraph:

1. Voluntary participation of respondents in the research is important. Moreover, participants have rights to withdraw from the study at any stage if they wish to do so.

2. Respondents should participate on the basis of informed consent. The principle of informed consent involves researchers providing sufficient information and assurances about taking part to allow individuals to understand the implications of participation and to reach a fully informed, considered and freely given decision about whether or not to do so, without the exercise of any pressure or coercion. [2]

3. The use of offensive, discriminatory, or other unacceptable language needs to be avoided in the formulation of Questionnaire/Interview/Focus group questions.

4. Privacy and anonymity or respondents is of a paramount importance.

5. Acknowledgement of works of other authors used in any part of the dissertation with the use of Harvard/APA/Vancouver referencing system according to the Dissertation Handbook

6. Maintenance of the highest level of objectivity in discussions and analyses throughout the research

7. Adherence to Data Protection Act (1998) if you are studying in the UK

In studies that do not involve primary data collection, on the other hand, ethical issues are going to be limited to the points d) and e) above.

Most universities have their own Code of Ethical Practice. It is critically important for you to thoroughly adhere to this code in every aspect of your research and declare your adherence in ethical considerations part of your dissertation.

My e-book,  The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistance  offers practical assistance to complete a dissertation with minimum or no stress. The e-book covers all stages of writing a dissertation starting from the selection to the research area to submitting the completed version of the work within the deadline. John Dudovskiy

[1] Bryman, A. &  Bell, E. (2007) “Business Research Methods”, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.

[2] Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012) “Research Methods for Business Students” 6th edition, Pearson Education Limited.

• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

• Virtual Tour
• Staff Directory
• En Español

You are here

Nih clinical research trials and you, guiding principles for ethical research.

Pursuing Potential Research Participants Protections

“When people are invited to participate in research, there is a strong belief that it should be their choice based on their understanding of what the study is about, and what the risks and benefits of the study are,” said Dr. Christine Grady, chief of the NIH Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, to Clinical Center Radio in a podcast.

Clinical research advances the understanding of science and promotes human health. However, it is important to remember the individuals who volunteer to participate in research. There are precautions researchers can take – in the planning, implementation and follow-up of studies – to protect these participants in research. Ethical guidelines are established for clinical research to protect patient volunteers and to preserve the integrity of the science.

NIH Clinical Center researchers published seven main principles to guide the conduct of ethical research:

Social and clinical value

Scientific validity, fair subject selection, favorable risk-benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent.

• Respect for potential and enrolled subjects

Every research study is designed to answer a specific question. The answer should be important enough to justify asking people to accept some risk or inconvenience for others. In other words, answers to the research question should contribute to scientific understanding of health or improve our ways of preventing, treating, or caring for people with a given disease to justify exposing participants to the risk and burden of research.

A study should be designed in a way that will get an understandable answer to the important research question. This includes considering whether the question asked is answerable, whether the research methods are valid and feasible, and whether the study is designed with accepted principles, clear methods, and reliable practices. Invalid research is unethical because it is a waste of resources and exposes people to risk for no purpose

The primary basis for recruiting participants should be the scientific goals of the study — not vulnerability, privilege, or other unrelated factors. Participants who accept the risks of research should be in a position to enjoy its benefits. Specific groups of participants  (for example, women or children) should not be excluded from the research opportunities without a good scientific reason or a particular susceptibility to risk.

Uncertainty about the degree of risks and benefits associated with a clinical research study is inherent. Research risks may be trivial or serious, transient or long-term. Risks can be physical, psychological, economic, or social. Everything should be done to minimize the risks and inconvenience to research participants to maximize the potential benefits, and to determine that the potential benefits are proportionate to, or outweigh, the risks.

To minimize potential conflicts of interest and make sure a study is ethically acceptable before it starts, an independent review panel should review the proposal and ask important questions, including: Are those conducting the trial sufficiently free of bias? Is the study doing all it can to protect research participants? Has the trial been ethically designed and is the risk–benefit ratio favorable? The panel also monitors a study while it is ongoing.

Potential participants should make their own decision about whether they want to participate or continue participating in research. This is done through a process of informed consent in which individuals (1) are accurately informed of the purpose, methods, risks, benefits, and alternatives to the research, (2) understand this information and how it relates to their own clinical situation or interests, and (3) make a voluntary decision about whether to participate.

Respect for potential and enrolled participants

Individuals should be treated with respect from the time they are approached for possible participation — even if they refuse enrollment in a study — throughout their participation and after their participation ends. This includes:

• respecting their privacy and keeping their private information confidential
• respecting their right to change their mind, to decide that the research does not match their interests, and to withdraw without a penalty
• informing them of new information that might emerge in the course of research, which might change their assessment of the risks and benefits of participating
• monitoring their welfare and, if they experience adverse reactions, unexpected effects, or changes in clinical status, ensuring appropriate treatment and, when necessary, removal from the study
• informing them about what was learned from the research

More information on these seven guiding principles and on bioethics in general

This page last reviewed on March 16, 2016

Connect with Us

• More Social Media from NIH

• Current Students
• News & Press
• Research Excellence
• Teaching & Student Experience
• Graduate Employability
• UK Rankings
• World Rankings
• Single Topic Rankings
• Research Excellence Framework
• Higher Education Awards
• Ageing and Health
• Cities and Place
• Culture and Creative Arts
• Social Justice
• Engagement and Place Awards 2024
• Faculty of Science, Agriculture & Engineering
• Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences
• Faculty of Medical Sciences
• Central and South Asia
• Latin America
• Middle East and North Africa
• North America
• Small Island Developing States
• South East Asia and Oceania
• Sub-Saharan Africa
• Transparency
• Office for Students Transparency Data
• Access & Participation
• Support for our Community
• UN Sustainable Development Goals
• https://www.ncl.ac.uk/who-we-are/equality/race-equality/black-history-month/
• Faith, Religion & Belief
• Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender
• Let Us Know
• Workplace Adjustments
• Useful Resources
• Equality Analysis
• Social Justice Stories
• Voluntary & Community Groups
• Santander Universities
• Regional Partnerships
• Widening Participation
• Newcastle Helix
• Art on Campus
• History of Newcastle University
• Education Strategy
• Find a Degree
• Subject Areas
• Step-by-Step Guide for UK Students
• Step-by-Step Guide for International and EU Students
• Applying through UCAS
• A and AS Levels
• Application Decisions
• Access Schemes and Pathway Programmes
• Policies and Procedures
• Applicants with Disabilities
• Mature Applicants
• Deferred Entry
• Undergraduate Application Advice
• Subject Scholarships
• Sports Scholarships
• Opportunity Scholarships
• VC's Excellence Scholarships
• VC's Global Scholarships
• VC's International Scholarships
• International Foundation Scholarships
• St Nicholas’ Educational Trust Scholarship
• NU Sanctuary Scholarships
• Undergraduate Norway Scholarship
• International Family Discounts
• VC’s EU Scholarships – Undergraduate
• VC's Excellence Scholarships - Europe
• VC's Business Excellence Scholarships - Europe
• Additional Costs
• Student Loans
• International Student Finance
• Undergraduate Open Days
• Sign up and Discover
• School and College Outreach
• Information for Parents and Supporters
• Why Choose Newcastle?
• Your Study Options
• Qualifications Explained
• Postgraduate Research Programmes
• Search for Funding
• Guide to Funding
• Postgraduate Tuition Fees
• Application Help
• Advice & Resources
• Your Offer Guide
• Postgraduate Open Days
• Doctoral College
• Distance Learning
• Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
• Study Support
• Campus Tours
• Life in Newcastle
• Get Involved
• Cost of Living
• Health & Wellbeing
• Mature Students
• Childcare Support
• Care Leavers
• Asylum Seekers
• Teaching & Learning
• Student Blog - Belong
• Types of Rooms
• Accessibility and Individual Requirements
• Bedrooms we offer
• Accommodation Guides
• New Student Guarantee
• Advanced Booking
• Submit an Application
• Part Year Student Accommodation
• What Happens Next?
• Safety and Security
• Returning Next Year
• Extending Your Stay
• Room Changes
• Parking & Bicycle Storage
• Post and Parcels
• Guest Visitors and Going Away
• Energy & Recycling
• ResLife Find a Flatmate
• Your ResLife Team
• Student Support
• Payment Methods
• Payment Schedules
• Managed Partnerships
• Rent Adjustments
• Student Village Receptions
• Your Accommodation Team
• Report a Fault
• Feedback and Complaints
• Internet Connection
• Work Placements
• About the Careers Service
• Careers Service News
• Careers Service Events
• Work for Yourself
• Career Planning
• Careers Modules
• Making Applications
• Interviews, Tests & Assessment Centres
• Internships, Placements & Shadowing
• Finding Jobs
• Handling Job Offers
• Researching Employers
• Making Contacts
• Further Study
• Awards, Competitions & Project Funding
• Volunteering
• Boost Your CV
• Defence Technical Undergraduate Scheme (DTUS)
• Getting Here
• Self-Guided Campus Tours
• Undergraduate Offer Holder Days
• Postgraduate Schools & Supervisors
• Tier 4 Visa from Inside UK
• Tier 4 Visa from Outside UK
• Short-Term Visa from Outside UK
• International Study Blog
• Our Pathway Courses
• English Language Courses
• Fees, Costs and Scholarships
• INTO Newcastle University
• Student Exchange and Study Abroad
• Request a Prospectus
• Chat to a Student
• Your Academic Experience
• Research Impact
• Research Strengths
• Centre for Ageing and Inequalities
• Centre for Biomedical Engineering
• Centre for Cancer
• Centre for Children and Youth
• Centre for Climate and Environmental Resilience
• Centre for Cyber Security and Resilience
• Centre for Data
• Centre for Energy
• Centre for Healthier Lives
• Centre for Heritage
• Centre for Landscape
• Centre for Mobility and Transport
• Centre for Rare Disease
• Centre for Researching Cities
• Centre for Transformative Neuroscience
• Centre for Water
• Research Culture Action Plan
• Working Together on Research Culture
• Global Partnerships
• Let's Work Together
• Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021
• Research Directory
• Research Integrity
• Code of Good Practice in Research
• University Research and Innovation Committee
• Ethics Forms and Processes
• GDPR Information for Research
• Ethics Toolkit
• Responsible Research Innovation
• Animals and Research
• Research Metrics
• Export Control
• Open Research
• Policies and Guidance
• Researcher Development
• Technicians' Community
• Research Facilities
• Research Funding
• Research News
• Case Studies
• CPD Courses
• Collaborative Research
• Company Creation
• Consultancy
• Corporate Partnerships
• DA Power Engineering
• DA MSc Digital Technology Solutions
• DA Executive Education Snr. Leader Apprenticeships
• Facilities and Equipment
• Intensive Industrial Innovation Programme
• Knowledge Transfer Partnerships
• Technology Transfer and Licensing
• Clinical Trials & Research
• Working with Newcastle
• Tender Opportunities
• Submitting an Invoice
• Sustainable Procurement
• Code of Conduct & Terms and Conditions
• Health & Social Challenges
• Creative Collaborations
• Connect with alumni
• Develop your career
• Discover lifelong learning opportunities
• Support future generations

Ethics Toolkit for Principal Investigators

• Newcastle University
• Our Research
• Research Governance
• Research Ethics

The Ethics Toolkit is designed to:

• assist students and staff when completing their ethical applications
• provide a repository of useful resources, including example ethics forms, information sheets and consent forms

Guidance for research involving animals.

Ethical and governance considerations for research data.

Environment

Guidance for research involving emissions, landscape/cultural heritage effects, fieldwork, sensitive areas, protected sites.

Human participation

Information on informed and voluntary consent, right to withdraw, privacy and confidentiality, and benefits outweighing risks.

Human tissue

Legal and ethical requirements regarding the collection, storage and disposal of samples.

NHS and social care

Information about health research authority approval and good clinical practice.

Sponsorship

Guidance for identifying the research sponsor.

Conflicts of interest

Guidance for declaring and managing real/potential conflicts of interest, and considerations for research funding offers.

External guidance

Other external information sources which may be helpful.

Example documents

Example documents, including participant information sheets and consent forms.

US Federal Agency support

Requirements for research involving US Federal Agency support.

External ethics

Find out whether Newcastle University will accept external ethics approvals.

The Nagoya Protocol

Find out about your obligation to comply with the Nagoya Protocol.

International

Information for research undertaken outside and/or with collaborators outside the European Economic Area.

Defence and security research

Research and innovation activities aimed at enhancing global security.

• How we work
• PhD Research
• Ethical Considerations in Research Paper Writing

Key Ethical Considerations in Research You Should Apply Carefully

Primary ethical issues in research to consider before writing.

Ethical considerations for paper writing are foundations that shape your study plan and framework that preserve research participants’ rights, research feasibility, and scientific completeness. The notion of ethical considerations in research relates to writing a scientific paper that includes diverse data collection from other reputable sources. There’s also an institutional review board that assesses the aims of your ethical issues research paper and its writing design to get assured the acceptance of the ethical considerations and scientific integrity.

Ethical considerations deal with research paper validity. It means you should solve particular ethical issues in conducting research and find answers to defined questions. A paper conclusion should coincide with the mentioned issues in the beginning and meet ethical considerations. Don’t forget to choose a proper writing method to enclose the given considerations and write a well-considered paper. The chosen method should fit your destination and help you to promote findings.

Cover Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research to Stand Out

To write a decent paper considering ethical considerations in qualitative research, you need to provide only appropriate facts connected to the examined subject. There’s no place for information violation – write only those facts that relate to the topic and the ethics considerations norms. Paper integrity and transparency are additional points that guarantee the credibility of your writing.

No matter what type of research paper you want to write – a qualitative or quantitative one – it’s important to preserve ethical considerations to save information relevance and usefulness. Ethical considerations have a deep concern for qualitative papers because they relate to the analysis of non-numerical information.

It’s essential to choose credible and reasonable data to write a worthy paper backed up with authentic sources by resonating with the given ethics considerations. See also Ethics in Clinical Research: Foundations and Current Issues . This method involves writing relevant data to emphasize paper purposes and perspectives and linking various theories with practical issues via properly chosen ethical research paper topics to write a comprehensive paper.

Worthy Ethics Research Paper Topics to Choose for Solid Outcomes

When writing a paper, it’s necessary to adhere to the defined ethical considerations to ensure high writing standards. This writing guideline monitors scientists and researchers’ activity to preserve the following aspects of ethics considerations:

• Data honesty by eliminating its fabrication.
• Stay unbiased for data analysis and review.
• Save consistency and clarity of your thoughts.
• Be open to new ideas and accept criticism.
• Be careful, analyze critically closely related papers.
• Finally, don’t violate copyrights and intellectual property.

Here’s a list of interesting ethical topics for research paper that will hook the tutors’ attention and will promote your investigation skills beneficially. These ethical considerations relate to diverse spheres of our life, i.e., business, social behavior, product consumption, medicine, etc. So, it’s important to determine what direction you’d like to examine and write a business ethics research paper on it:

• Ethical background of sexism in getting a new position.
• Mass media ethics: how to choose trusted sources?
• Preserving anonymity while visiting a doctor.
• Current reality: is it ethical to be child-free?
• Common prejudices based on religion.
• Ethical issues of online bullying.

So, when selecting decent ethics research paper topics, it’s vital to write a unique, approved, and authoritative paper preserving ethics considerations principles.

• FREE topic suggestion
• 100% original research
• Dedicated experts only

Why Ethical Considerations Are Vital for Ethical Research Papers?

Have you ever thought about why ethical issues in research are important for scientists? Let’s look at its nature and main characteristics. First, ethical considerations are the set of principles that maintain paper aims to expand knowledge. They support common values of cooperation between research paper participants.

Ethical considerations confirm paper reliability, so the readers can rely on paper findings and outcomes. Second, writing norms of ethical consideration in research promote principles for collaborative work, guaranteeing accountability, respect, and trust.

Ethical considerations also come up with individual dignity, meaning you should consider other research paper participants’ viewpoints and allow them to express their opinions. According to the key ethics considerations, it’s important to treat them equitably. Ethical considerations for paper writing have nothing in common with paper misconducts like plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification.

How to Write an Ethical Research Paper to Outline Its Main Points

When writing an ethical research paper, it’s preferable to think out its structure carefully and divide a paper into several paragraphs. Using this writing approach, you’ll write a clear plan and coherent study without violating ethical considerations for scientific works.

Also, it would be nice to know each participant’s stance concerning ethics considerations and write a united position that will support the given statements. Therefore, participants’ consent is another element of ethical considerations for research. It’s obvious that the majority of research and scientific investigations involve several participants who should know all details about the research work.

All participants should consider ethics in business research and make informed consent ahead of the research writing to prove the purpose, outcomes, and value of the paper. Concerning the ethics considerations, it’s crucial to ensure participants’ confidentiality and anonymity. Any information related to participants shouldn’t be available to anyone else. Alongside this, a researcher should write why they chose a particular individual to conduct a research paper.

Examine Ethics in Writing Research Papers With Professional Writers

Want to write a decent research paper that will meet the ethical considerations? Call our writers who will guarantee you a perfect paper covering the chosen topic. A PhD writing service follows ethics considerations like integrity and credibility. Our impeccable writers create well-considered ethical research papers that outline your personal position and convincing arguments for and against the raised issues.

Experienced writing geeks follow major norms of considerations ethics in writing research papers by saving your study flawlessness and transparency. We’ll write a 100% authentic paper including credible scientific sources to strengthen its main ideas. What’s more, your research will save the key features of typical scientific writing and will be highly assessed by the tutors. So, it’s an exceptional chance to polish your paper ethics considerations and promote your academic performance.

Proposal Maker

Before starting a project or any activity in an organization, there’s always a need to share this idea. Sharing it to a group would result in a much more outstanding proposition. Take, for example, a proposal for a project which needs to be evaluated and thought over before its implementation.

Creating proposals needs a lot of thinking. There are numerous factors that need to be speculated. It needs to be discussed and of course, be approved by someone of high position. Writing  grant proposals are very significant too, for this is mostly what the executives will be taking note of.

• Simple Proposal Formats
• Project Proposal Examples

59+ Proposal Examples

Sample proposal example.

• Google Docs
• Editable PDF

Size: A4, US

Project Proposal Example

Social Media Proposal Example

Sample Proposal Template

• Apple Pages

Size: 76.3 KB

Size: US, A4

Research Proposal Examples

Research proposal template.

Size: 52.7 KB

Research Proposal Flowchart Template

• MS Publisher

Size: 47.8 KB

Research Proposal White Paper Template

Nursing Research Proposal Template

Size: 46.7 KB

University Research Proposal Template

Size: 42 KB

One Page Research Proposal Template

Marketing Research Proposal Template

Medical Student Research Proposal

Size: 294 KB

Undergraduate Research Project Proposal Example

Size: 13 KB

Research Proposal Format Example

Size: 43 KB

Qualitative Research Example

Size: 90 KB

Project Proposals

It project proposal template.

Size: 45 KB

Project Proposal Template Example

Size: 100 KB

Business Project Proposal Template

Size: 114 KB

Engineering Project Proposal Template

Size: 88.4 KB

Funding Project Proposal Template

Size: 133 KB

Film Project Proposal Example

Size: 307 KB

Major Project Sample Example

Size: 21 KB

Group Project Example

Size: 125 KB

Sample Proposal Form Example

Size: 203 KB

Business Proposals

Business proposal template.

Size: 101 KB

Restaurant Business Proposal Template

Size: 150 KB

Sample Cleaning Business Proposal Template

Size: 36 KB

Small Business Proposal Example

Size: 174 KB

Business Proposal Checklist Example

Size: 188 KB

Business Application Form Example

Size: 219 KB

Thesis Proposal Examples

Thesis proposal template.

Size: 80 KB

Thesis Proposal Gantt Chart Template

Size: 30 KB

Thesis Outline in PDF

Size: 118 KB

Masters Thesis Proposal Outline Example

Size: 15 KB

Free PhD Thesis Proposal Example

Sociology Thesis Example

Size: 25 KB

Dissertation Proposal

Dissertation proposal template.

Size: 124 KB

Free Dissertation Progress Report Example

Size: 51 KB

Dissertation Proposal Outline Example

Size: 160 KB

Doctoral Dissertation Example

Size: 41 KB

MBA Dissertation Proposal Example

Proposal Letters

Proposal introduction letter example.

Free Proposal Application Example

Size: 518 KB

Project Proposal Letter Example

Size: 82 KB

Internship Proposal Letter Example

Size: 64 KB

Budget Proposals

Simple budget proposal template.

Size: 49 KB

Business Budget Proposal Template

Size: 52 KB

Assembly Budget Example

Grant Budget Proposal Example

Size: 356 KB

Capital Budget Proposal Example

Size: 237 KB

Conference Proposals

Conference sponsorship example.

Size: 363 KB

Annual Conference Proposal

Size: 195 KB

Conference Proposal Form Example

Size: 131 KB

Event Proposal Samples

Cultural event proposal example.

Size: 139 KB

Free Event Design and Production Example

Size: 32 KB

Event Sponsorship Proposal Example

New Event Proposal Example

Size: 152 KB

Financial Proposals

Technical and financial proposal example.

Size: 212 KB

Financial Request Example

Size: 230 KB

Financial Proposal Form Example

Size: 94 KB

Technical Proposals

Technical paper example.

Size: 435 KB

Technical Proposal Checklist

Size: 176 KB

Technical Budget Proposal

Size: 57 KB

Database Proposals

Database project example.

Size: 671 KB

Database System Proposal Example

Size: 1015 KB

Grant Proposals

Filmmaking grant proposal.

Size: 374 KB

Grant Proposal Form Example

Size: 207 KB

Grant Proposal Checklist Example

Marketing Proposals

Digital marketing proposal.

Size: 654 KB

IT Marketing Proposal Example

Real Estate Services Marketing

Report Proposal Samples

Final report example.

Size: 745 KB

Proposal Outline Report Example

Size: 530 KB

Restriction Report Proposal

Sales Proposals

Sales business proposal.

Size: 39 KB

Sales Marketing Proposal

Size: 309 KB

Short Sales Example

Size: 182 KB

Training Proposals

Training program proposal.

Company Training Example

Size: 157 KB

On-the-Job Training Proposal

Size: 130 KB

Fellowship Training Example

What Is a Proposal?

Proposal examples are written propositions that are addressed to clients or by any department to its head executives. It contains ideas that would be beneficial to an organization. There are many types of proposals, such as a budget proposal and event proposal.

Proposals aim to be approved by the people involved. Writing a proposal , you have to ensure that all is well thought of. It is important for a proposal to be organized, structured, complete, and clear. You can make proposals in a way you see best and most understandable.

A Business Proposal and What It Holds

One type of proposal is the business proposal . This proposal aims to grab a client to invest in their organization. These proposals mostly address clients, who would potentially purchase goods and services.

There are no specific formats for a business proposal. What matters is its content that delivers a complete and clear concept. Its important elements are:

• Cover letter or page
• Table of Contents
• Overview of the Problem
• Method of Solving the Issue
• Company’s Qualification
• Benchmarks (or Schedule)
• Total Expenditure

The length of the proposal is insignificant. It focuses more on how information is communicated.

Guidelines for Writing a Proposal

Writing a proposal is a skill. Though it’s an easy way out to just follow proposal examples , it’s different when making an original one. Don’t get discouraged, we have prepared a few samples for your reference. Plus, here are tips and guidelines to make your proposal effective and more attractive.

1. Planning a Proposal

• Know the people who will be reading it :  Understanding what the reader will want to hear is important. When writing a proposal , keep in mind what you want your readers to understand. You may also see sponsorship proposal examples & samples .
• Determine the issue of which your proposal is aiming to resolve:  You have to make sure that the readers understand the problem, the situation and has it been dealt with before.
• Unravel solutions to those problems and issues :  Make it straightforward and easy to understand. Keep a narrow perspective of the problem and foresee outcomes. You may also like investment proposal examples .
• Apply a writing technique that would make it easier for readers to understand :  Keeping it simple yet persuasive is much more meaningful.
• Make use of an outline :  This keeps a proposal organized, and will help you deliver what you desire. You may also check out request for proposal examples .

2. Writing the Proposal

• Impress your readers with a firm introduction :  Make sure you catch the attention of the readers and keep them interested. You may also see policy proposal examples & samples .
• State the issues clearly and completely :  Determine the causes and effects of these issues.
• Issues should have solutions :  Explain how to address these issues, why in this manner, and what is expected to be achieved. You may also like concept proposal examples & samples .
• Include a well-constructed schedule of duties and budget :  Be as accurate as possible making sure that benefits outweigh costs.
• Wrap up everything in a short but on-point way :  Keep your content to a minimum and precise. Do not beat around the bush, but be straightforward with what you can offer.
• Keep an open mind and let others assess your work :  Edit your work and proofread to make sure there are no mistakes. You may also check out fundraising proposal examples & samples .

What Is a Research Proposal?

Aside from business proposals , there are other kinds of proposals that anyone can encounter, such as a research proposal. What is a research proposal?

A research proposal is the written proposal for a research paper that aims to convince the reader that there is a need for a research study to be conducted and needs financial aid for the research to be successful. You may also see non-profit proposal examples & samples . Research proposals present all that will be done during the research, what it is for, and what benefits are expected to be achieved at the end.

What Is a Grant Proposal?

There are organizations that operate with the purpose of serving the people and not for profit accumulation, like charities, government branches, foundations, and trusts. You may also like partnership proposal examples & samples . Therefore, to acquire funds that are needed for that organization, grants have to be issued.

A grant proposal is a document requesting funds to achieve a certain undertaking. These kinds of design proposals are used by any government entity asking for monetary assistance to be prepared for operations like improving roads, building facilities that would benefit the society, scholarships, research, charities or cases wherein a calamity has devastatingly affected a community.

Types of Proposals

Reaching this point, you have seen different types of proposals. To better understand, here are brief summaries of the different types of proposals:

1. Unsolicited Proposal:  Unsolicited proposals are proposals where no instructions regarding submission of proposals are made but are submitted anyway to catch the potential sponsor’s interest. Some business loan proposals are unsolicited and may be submitted anytime.

2. Solicited Proposal:  Solicited proposals is a response to any specific program that is issued by any organization. Proposals of this kind usually have deadlines. Take a look at the  security proposal examples  that are online for more.

3. Supplemental Proposal:  There are instances that the current budget is not enough for the current project. To acquire more funds, a request for an increase in the budget is made in the form of a supplemental proposal.

4. Competing Renewal Proposal:  A proposal is made to request sponsors for continued funding for a project proposal that is about to terminate. These type of proposals are like newly-made proposals that need to be approved in the same manner as the new one.

5. Non-competing Proposal:  This type of proposal is a request for the succeeding year’s funding, including the progress report of the project, the budget, etc. It also has the schedule of duties, changes or updates, and other relevant information about the project. You may also see grant proposal examples .

General FAQs

1. define a proposal..

A proposal is a written plan or a suggestion put forward for consideration by others. It is mostly formal. Business proposals are sent to the prospective client to obtain specific jobs. Also used by a seller, who writes to a buyer to know if he/she wants to buy certain services/goods from the seller.

2. Why is a Proposal important?

Proposals are a way to pitch an idea and state your requirements. It is important because it provides information in writing and you can act knowing the implications of your choices and decisions. Proposals help in making a structured and logical argument to lay down every idea and point in your favor.

3. What should a Proposal cover?

Proposals must cover the following:

• Introduction: a brief overview of the issues, costs, and benefits
• Issue: The subject, the reason for the proposal, the main argument, etc.
• Solutions: Step-by-step plan, potential obstacles and how to overcome them
• Qualifications: Your personnel requirement, experience, etc.
• Conclusions: Add the budget , benefits and reinforce your final point.

4. What makes a Good Proposal?

Preparing a winning proposal means that you are writing for the client and are proving a clear solution to their issues. Not every proposal you make is accepted by the client, so make sure that you make it from the point of view that is beneficial to the client.

5. What is the best way to conclude a Proposal?

The best way to conclude a proposal can be:

• To summarize the key points of your proposal
• Focus on why action is needed
• Emphasize the benefits the action provides
• Add bullet points of essential information
• Add verbal highlights of your key benefits
• Close on a positive note and ask them to take action.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

Generate a proposal for a new school recycling program

Compose a proposal for a school field trip to a science museum.