The text of the PhD thesis continues in the same textbook-like style in the Methodology chapters. There was uselessly long section describing the process of block model creation in MATLAB Simulink software.
The "opponent" system: my experience at a Swedish PhD defence
Advantages of the "opponent" system The biggest advantage of the opponent system is that it ensures independent review of the thesis by someone who knows the thesis very, very well. I had to know the thesis inside out and backwards, because I had to present it!
PDF Opponent Review of Doctoral Dissertation
Formal standards Reviewed thesis has high formal standard. The structure follows recommendation for doctoral thesis. All used sources are cited correctly according citation norm. The title does not correspond with content of the thesis: "cases of research policy" vers. significantly narrow point of view "university-based research policy".
PDF Short instruction for pre-reviewers and opponents of PhD theses
The regulations allow the same person to serve as a pre-reviewer and an opponent of the same thesis. In such case, the opponent's report may copy relevant parts of the pre-review. The report should also include the main questions and concerns that the opponent plans to raise during the defense. Each opponent writes an independent report.
PDF INSTRUCTIONS FOR OPPONENT OF DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE OFFICIAL OPPONENT'S STATEMENT The opponent's statement consists of an evaluation of the dissertation and its public defence. The statement constitutes the final basis for the Faculty Board's decision on whether to approve the dissertation or not. Thus, it is important that the opponent clearly states: 1) any defects of the dissertation, 2) the merits of the ...
Preparing for a Dissertation Defense. Key Questions, Key Approaches
PDF | A single perspective on Defending a Thesis Research. Includes sample of common questions asked by "Opponents". In a thesis defense, the... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ...
PDF Opponents review of final thesis (compilation)
Opponent of the thesis and his/her workplace: Evaluation criteria. Maximum points (100) Assigned points. Meeting the objectives and mastering the procedures of own work: conciseness, topicality, follow-up on the topic of the final work. 8 - 10 points. full fulfilment of the objectives and excellent handling of own work procedures. 10.
PDF Guidelines for opponents of doctoral dissertations
The opponent(s) is (are) requested to give a written statement on official letterhead concerning the dissertation and its defence within two weeks of the public defence. Please include the evaluation table with your statement. On receipt of this statement, the Doctoral Programme Committee decides on the approval of the dissertation. Based on opponent's statement and pre-examiners ...
Opponent Review of Doctoral Dissertation
Opponent Review of Doctoral Dissertation ... addressing a cutting-edge topic in the research field of the pursued PhD. Overall evaluation: The candidate has addressed a very hot and timely research topic by writing a PhD thesis that is original, complete, and clear. In general, the dissertation is well-structured, well-written, and
PDF Microsoft Word
This opponent review was elaborated in reference to the letter of the Dean of Mechanical Engineering Faculty STU doc.Ing.Jaroslav Katolícky,PhD from March 2014 to oppose the PhD thesis submitted by the candidate.
PDF VaV EN
Opponent's review of the Doctoral Thesis Candidate Title of the doctoral thesis Study Programme Tutor Opponent e-mail ... Statement on compliance with citation ethics Remarks
A guide to the procedure for the public defence of a doctoral thesis
A doctoral thesis at a Swedish university must be defended in public in the presence of an expert in the field from another university, known as the opponent. The opponent is officially appointed by the Faculty Board. The Faculty Board also appoints a chairman of the public defence and an examining board (usually three people).
PDF Guidelines for the formal procedure at the public defence of doctoral
Guidelines for the formal procedure at the public defence of doctoral theses at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology Those present at the public defence of a doctoral thesis are the opponent, the doctoral student (respondent), the examining committee members, the chairperson and, as a rule, the main supervisor. The defence is also open to the interested members of the public.
PDF Opponent review of doctoral dissertation thesis
Opponent review of doctoral dissertation thesis English title: Hippocampal neuronal representation of a moving object in a novel spatial avoidance task ... The thesis fulfills all necessary criteria for a PhD thesis at the Faculty of Science, Charles University. I therefore recommend this thesis for defense. Prague, May 7th, 2021
PDF Opponent'S Review on The Dissertation Thesis
A) Topicality of the thesis The topic of the dissertation thesis with title "Influence of Cognitive Factors on Consumers' Price Fairness Perceptions, Behavioural Loyalty, and Purchase Intention" is relevant to the study programme. Moreover, it is complex and according to the PhD. student it is investigating unique, unexplored but vital topic as presented in the dissertation thesis. On ...
PDF Opponent's review of PhD thesis proposal
Opponent's review of PhD thesis proposal PhD student: Ing. Tomasz Limisiewicz Title: Interpreting and Controlling Linugistc Features in Neural Networks' Representations
Full article: Doctoral defence formats
The doctoral defence is the oral examination of the doctoral thesis. This event is an important step for doctoral candidates in obtaining their degree. It is important, as in some defence formats such as the UK-style viva voce or, shorter, viva, the performance during the defence forms part of the overall assessment of the thesis.
PDF General information
This means that three weeks before the thesis defense, the opponent and grading committee should have received the printed thesis. This is important because the quality of review depends on all parties having enough time to go evaluate the thesis contents thoroughly.
My opponent tore my thesis apart. What would be a good reply?
Dissertation. So, after 7 years of PhDing, I turned my thesis in. I had two opponents, the first one graded the thesis as pass, the second one as a fail and that he does not recommend it for passing. The reason cited was that I ignored several important books, which unfortunately were in German and French, neither of which is my native language.
Public defence of PhD thesis and licentiate seminar
The licentiate thesis must be defended at a public seminar, where an examiner and an opponent are involved. They should have a PhD degree. Anyone who has been supervisor, or has another relationship with the respondent or the supervisors, can not be appointed as examiner or opponent. The mandatory seminar take place during the academic year and ...
Apply for public defence of your thesis
Your opponent shall be a researcher who must hold a doctoral degree (PhD), possess expert knowledge of the thesis' area and be without conflict of interest with respect to you, your supervisors, or the project. Your opponent doesn't need to hold a docentship.
Opponent ' s review of the Doctoral Thesis Candidate
Opponent ' s review of the Doctoral Thesis Candidate. Commentary: The dissertation is devoted to the analysis of the perceptions of the Syrian industry about the benefits of BIM (Building Information Modelling) technology and challenges facing the implementation of BIM. The work of Sonia Ahmed is applied to the newest and most advanced ...
PDF Microsoft Word
GUIDELINES FOR DOCTORAL THESIS OPPONENTS. doctoral thesis in Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) is an independent research paper that presents a novel solution to a significant problem in the research area of the respective doctoral curriculum and demonstrates the candidate's ability to conduct independent research.
COMMENTS
The text of the PhD thesis continues in the same textbook-like style in the Methodology chapters. There was uselessly long section describing the process of block model creation in MATLAB Simulink software.
Advantages of the "opponent" system The biggest advantage of the opponent system is that it ensures independent review of the thesis by someone who knows the thesis very, very well. I had to know the thesis inside out and backwards, because I had to present it!
Formal standards Reviewed thesis has high formal standard. The structure follows recommendation for doctoral thesis. All used sources are cited correctly according citation norm. The title does not correspond with content of the thesis: "cases of research policy" vers. significantly narrow point of view "university-based research policy".
The regulations allow the same person to serve as a pre-reviewer and an opponent of the same thesis. In such case, the opponent's report may copy relevant parts of the pre-review. The report should also include the main questions and concerns that the opponent plans to raise during the defense. Each opponent writes an independent report.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE OFFICIAL OPPONENT'S STATEMENT The opponent's statement consists of an evaluation of the dissertation and its public defence. The statement constitutes the final basis for the Faculty Board's decision on whether to approve the dissertation or not. Thus, it is important that the opponent clearly states: 1) any defects of the dissertation, 2) the merits of the ...
PDF | A single perspective on Defending a Thesis Research. Includes sample of common questions asked by "Opponents". In a thesis defense, the... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ...
Opponent of the thesis and his/her workplace: Evaluation criteria. Maximum points (100) Assigned points. Meeting the objectives and mastering the procedures of own work: conciseness, topicality, follow-up on the topic of the final work. 8 - 10 points. full fulfilment of the objectives and excellent handling of own work procedures. 10.
The opponent(s) is (are) requested to give a written statement on official letterhead concerning the dissertation and its defence within two weeks of the public defence. Please include the evaluation table with your statement. On receipt of this statement, the Doctoral Programme Committee decides on the approval of the dissertation. Based on opponent's statement and pre-examiners ...
Opponent Review of Doctoral Dissertation ... addressing a cutting-edge topic in the research field of the pursued PhD. Overall evaluation: The candidate has addressed a very hot and timely research topic by writing a PhD thesis that is original, complete, and clear. In general, the dissertation is well-structured, well-written, and
This opponent review was elaborated in reference to the letter of the Dean of Mechanical Engineering Faculty STU doc.Ing.Jaroslav Katolícky,PhD from March 2014 to oppose the PhD thesis submitted by the candidate.
Opponent's review of the Doctoral Thesis Candidate Title of the doctoral thesis Study Programme Tutor Opponent e-mail ... Statement on compliance with citation ethics Remarks
A doctoral thesis at a Swedish university must be defended in public in the presence of an expert in the field from another university, known as the opponent. The opponent is officially appointed by the Faculty Board. The Faculty Board also appoints a chairman of the public defence and an examining board (usually three people).
Guidelines for the formal procedure at the public defence of doctoral theses at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology Those present at the public defence of a doctoral thesis are the opponent, the doctoral student (respondent), the examining committee members, the chairperson and, as a rule, the main supervisor. The defence is also open to the interested members of the public.
Opponent review of doctoral dissertation thesis English title: Hippocampal neuronal representation of a moving object in a novel spatial avoidance task ... The thesis fulfills all necessary criteria for a PhD thesis at the Faculty of Science, Charles University. I therefore recommend this thesis for defense. Prague, May 7th, 2021
A) Topicality of the thesis The topic of the dissertation thesis with title "Influence of Cognitive Factors on Consumers' Price Fairness Perceptions, Behavioural Loyalty, and Purchase Intention" is relevant to the study programme. Moreover, it is complex and according to the PhD. student it is investigating unique, unexplored but vital topic as presented in the dissertation thesis. On ...
Opponent's review of PhD thesis proposal PhD student: Ing. Tomasz Limisiewicz Title: Interpreting and Controlling Linugistc Features in Neural Networks' Representations
The doctoral defence is the oral examination of the doctoral thesis. This event is an important step for doctoral candidates in obtaining their degree. It is important, as in some defence formats such as the UK-style viva voce or, shorter, viva, the performance during the defence forms part of the overall assessment of the thesis.
This means that three weeks before the thesis defense, the opponent and grading committee should have received the printed thesis. This is important because the quality of review depends on all parties having enough time to go evaluate the thesis contents thoroughly.
Dissertation. So, after 7 years of PhDing, I turned my thesis in. I had two opponents, the first one graded the thesis as pass, the second one as a fail and that he does not recommend it for passing. The reason cited was that I ignored several important books, which unfortunately were in German and French, neither of which is my native language.
The licentiate thesis must be defended at a public seminar, where an examiner and an opponent are involved. They should have a PhD degree. Anyone who has been supervisor, or has another relationship with the respondent or the supervisors, can not be appointed as examiner or opponent. The mandatory seminar take place during the academic year and ...
Your opponent shall be a researcher who must hold a doctoral degree (PhD), possess expert knowledge of the thesis' area and be without conflict of interest with respect to you, your supervisors, or the project. Your opponent doesn't need to hold a docentship.
Opponent ' s review of the Doctoral Thesis Candidate. Commentary: The dissertation is devoted to the analysis of the perceptions of the Syrian industry about the benefits of BIM (Building Information Modelling) technology and challenges facing the implementation of BIM. The work of Sonia Ahmed is applied to the newest and most advanced ...
GUIDELINES FOR DOCTORAL THESIS OPPONENTS. doctoral thesis in Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) is an independent research paper that presents a novel solution to a significant problem in the research area of the respective doctoral curriculum and demonstrates the candidate's ability to conduct independent research.