Dawn of the digital age and the evolution of the marketing mix

  • Published: 22 February 2016
  • Volume 17 , pages 170–186, ( 2016 )

Cite this article

research paper on marketing mix

  • Graham Jackson &
  • Vandana Ahuja 1  

63k Accesses

36 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This paper traces the journey of the marketing mix paradigm from its inception through continuous debate and discussion over the years. It traces the evolution of marketing mix components and the transformation of the marketing paradigm as society, technology, media, information and money have changed. A significant evolution of technology has changed the face of marketing. The paper uses inputs from marketing experts to trace the all-encompassing and unstoppable expansion of cyberspace that is changing every single dimension of consumers’ lifestyles. The paper outlines the acceleration of the information revolution with the advent of the ‘Read-Write Web’ or ‘Web 2.0’. Within this emergent virtual domain, corporate blogs, online communities, social networks and wikis have redefined the routine lives of individuals and changed the way people relate to information, brands, other people and even themselves. The discussion further proceeds to address three important issues facing the world of marketing today: the implications of today’s technologically inspired environment for marketing in the twenty-first century, the conceptualization of a customer mix as a pre-requisite for the marketing mix and, in conclusion, finally proposes an update to the marketing mix itself. In addition to this, the paper also traces the incorporation of the concepts of relationship marketing, customer relationship management, co-creation, salesforce automation and digital marketing in current-day marketing environments.

Similar content being viewed by others

research paper on marketing mix

Evolution of the Marketing Mind-Set and the Value-Creation Process

research paper on marketing mix

Marketing Strategies in the Age of Technology

research paper on marketing mix

Introduction

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

It all started with Culliton, who declared that the role of the marketing manager was to be a ‘mixer of ingredients’. 1 He was followed by Borden, who coined the term ‘marketing mix’ in his early teaching and then in a 1964 article. 2 Borden deemed that the mix included 12 elements: product planning, branding, pricing, distribution channels, personal selling, advertising, promotions, packaging, display, servicing, physical handling, and fact-finding and analysis. McCarthy then crystalized the marketing mix into the highly memorable ‘4Ps’: product, price, place and promotion, which became the standard classification, taught and studied throughout the world. 3 Since the 1960s, the marketing domain has changed considerably, and there have been many proposals to improve the classification of the marketing mix. There has been a veritable proliferation of new ‘Ps’, as professors and practitioners of marketing have tried to keep this key term up-to-date.

One target of dissatisfaction was ‘P’ for promotion that was recognized by many authors as being unclear and too narrow a definition (see, eg Hartley). 4 The common denominator among the various authors who examined the issue was the search for a more detailed, inclusive and realistic definition under the heading ‘communication’ that would include both media advertising and sales promotion. The accumulated literature was thoroughly reviewed at the start of the 1990s, which led to a broader definition of ‘the communication mix’ to include mass communications, personal communications and publicity. 5 The ‘publicity’ element was also refined by many contributors who referred to the actual tool in the marketing mix as ‘public relations’, with publicity being an outcome of good PR (see, eg Dewitt). 6 More recently, it has been realized that all the elements of the communication mix for any brand, company or institution should be seamlessly combined for maximum impact (see, eg Schultz et al. ). 7 Thus, we now have the concept of ‘integrated marketing communication’ (IMC) that includes media advertising, sales promotion, public relations, package design, personal selling and direct marketing. In this article, the present authors will propose redefining this as IMC 2.0 to include the use of social media and the development of viral marketing communication campaigns.

Another element in the marketing mix to receive critical attention was ‘P’ for place, originally covered by Borden with his three elements — distribution channels, personal selling and physical handling. 2 In its broader sense, the term ‘distribution’ could encompass the following three sub-elements:

where the products were to be sold (ie in which geographically defined markets);

which type of sales channel would be used (eg directly via a company sales force or indirectly via independent reps);

how the products would actually be supplied (ie physical delivery logistics).

Thus, by the mid 1980s, the traditional classification of the marketing mix had been modernized and was already being taught by Shapiro in the Harvard Business School MBA Program as product, pricing, communication and distribution. 8

That was by no means the end of the story. By the late 1970s, it became clear that the discipline of marketing should not just cover the marketing of products and brands, but should also be relevant to the service sector (see, eg Shostak). 9 The marketing mix had to be made relevant not only to business-to-consumer (B2C) manufacturing companies, such as Coca-Cola, and business-to-business (B2B) companies, such as IBM, but also to suppliers of intangibles, such as airline companies (eg British Airways), hotels (eg Hilton), retailers (eg Wal-Mart) and banks (eg HSBC). The traditional 4P classification was clearly inadequate, and a search began to expand the classification by including more Ps. The most widely quoted version of an extended marketing mix (‘7Ps’) includes ‘physical evidence’, ‘participants’ (or ‘people’) and ‘processes’. 10 Physical evidence referred to the look and feel of the service environment, which contributed to the overall customer experience. Participants referred mainly to the character, motivation and skills of the service providers. Processes included the selection, training and supervision of the service providers, supported by data management based on information technologies. The 7P classification has been accepted by Kotler in one of the world’s most widely used marketing textbooks (see, eg Kotler and Keller). 11

Another proposal has been made for the special case of cause-related marketing, where marketing plans are developed and executed that link customers and the company to promote social issues, such as protection of the environment. 12 In this special context, there are eight Ps, including people, partners, participation and passion. Both the 7P extended marketing mix and the 8P classification include P for people and this idea will provide a catalyst for our customer-centric approach described below.

There have been other suggested additions to the marketing mix, including ‘positioning’, which focusses on perceptions in the minds of the target audience. 13 While accepting the importance of this idea, the present authors prefer to consider positioning as a function of the application of the four basic Ps, rather than as an independent element in the marketing mix. For example, the positioning of Apple’s iPhone is a mainly a function of the product functionality and design, its price level and the corporate image of Apple Inc.

A different marketing mix consisting of 5Ps has been suggested by Hayden. 14 She proposed a classification based on people, positioning, personal credibility, push plus pull and persistence. This 5P model has not posed a significant challenge to McCarthy’s traditional 4P model, probably because, although containing some insight, her five elements of the classification are not on the same conceptual level.

There have also been suggestions to include P for programs in the marketing mix, but it seems to the present authors that a programme is an integrated formulation of the basic 4Ps into a plan with defined goals, strategies and forecast outcomes. P for performance could also be suggested, but performance measured by bookings, sales revenues, contribution to profits and so on is the outcome of a plan and its execution, not simply one of the marketing tools that have to be managed to attain the desired results.

To the above proliferation of Ps, one of the present authors notes his personal contribution to the field by adding ‘professional and personal service’ in his lectures in marketing over the last 20 years. 15 Another suggestion is ‘P’ for ‘purpose’ (Institute of Management Technology). 16 When considered by the dedicated panel of marketing professors and practitioners (including the present authors), the conclusion reached was that this element was not just relevant to the function of marketing, but was a broader issue relevant to the organization as a whole. This topic may be addressed in a future article. So, at the time of writing, we can identify three possible categorizations of the marketing mix elements, depending on the point of view of different marketing experts: ‘purists’, ‘modernists’ and ‘expansionists’ (see Table 1 ).

In presenting the various categorizations in Table 1 , we note in passing that the plurality of Ps (or any preferred subset of them) that might satisfy ‘expansionists’ exceeds Borden’s original multiplicity of marketing mix elements. 2 Assuming that most readers will adopt one of the above three optional categorizations, is everybody happy? Unfortunately not. Some readers, the present authors included, feel rather uncomfortable with the state of affairs described above. Our reasons are as follows:

The actual term ‘marketing mix’ has not yet been defined and might even need to be refined. Everyone who has ever taught, studied or practiced marketing probably feels, ‘well, we all agree and know what it is’. But the present authors are not quite so confident and believe that the term itself requires clarification.

Expanding IMC by adding ‘communication through the use of social media and viral marketing communication campaigns’ appears to bring the concept up-to-date. But it belies the paradigm shift that has occurred in consumers’ behaviour, attitudes and use of media and, therefore, hardly does it justice. This issue will be addressed in greater depth below.

The marketing of services is clearly different from the marketing of products and would therefore benefit from having its own classification. This was recognized some years ago. 9, 17

In this article we will address the first two issues. We will first clarify the term ‘marketing mix’, then will consider how times have changed in the world of marketing, and finally will propose a new customer-centric paradigm for the marketing mix that is better fitted to the twenty-first century. In a future article, we plan to propose a new classification of the marketing mix that is more appropriate for the service sector and we will consider how a different (but complementary) set of four Ps could be developed not just for products or services, but also at the organizational levels of companies or institutions.

Clarification of the definition of the marketing mix

It is first necessary to define the phenomena to be classified in the concept of the marketing mix. Van Waterschoot and Van den Bulte determined that, ‘a marketing mix classification should explicitly make clear that it tries to schematize all the controllable demand-impinging instruments that are combined into a marketing programme used by the firm to achieve a certain level and type of response from its target market’ (p. 8). 5 This definition seems to be theoretically correct, but we felt that it does not reflect the way marketing practitioners would put it and does not quite express the spirit of the way the marketing mix was originally defined by Culliton in 1948. The original definition perceived the marketing mix to be a management tool. We would add that, if we were to adopt a management orientation, we would link the definition to a sense of purpose: what goals are the marketing manager attempting to achieve when planning and using the marketing mix. To address these two issues, we would like to suggest the following definition: ‘The “marketing mix” is the marketing manager’s set of key tools that can be adjusted, improved or changed in order to match the needs of the marketplace, to gain competitive advantage and to maximize long-term profits’.

This definition raises the question whether the elements of the marketing mix are objects (parameters, instruments and tools) or activities (procedures, policies and processes). 8 Shapiro considered them essentially to be tools, and this is the position taken by Kotler and also the present authors. In accepting this position, we would point out that it precludes the inclusion of elements such as people, participants, passion and purpose in the classification of the marketing mix, as they are not objects — tools that can be adjusted, improved and changed by the marketing manager. It also precludes the inclusion of processes, because that is the operational activity of adjusting, improving or changing the basic tools of the marketing mix.

The above definition of the marketing mix raises another question: ‘What is the purpose of a business?’ Some company CEOs would concur with Friedman’s dictum that the purpose of a business is to generate profits 18 and that the maximization of long-term profits should be the focus of any truly socially responsible CEO. But since the 1970s, it has often been accepted that a firm’s goal should be defined in a broader manner, to optimize the interests of multiple types of its stakeholders. This more modern approach is adopted by socially responsible companies, such as Ben & Jerry’s, and it is especially clear in all organizations that are not-for-profit. Hence, it would be more politically correct to define the marketing mix in a more generalized manner as follows: ‘The marketing mix is the marketing manager’s set of key tools that can be adjusted, improved or changed in order to match the needs of the marketplace, to gain competitive advantage and to optimize the organization’s stakeholder value’.

From 4Ps to 7Cs: The context of the marketing mix

The original marketing mix was conceived as a company-centric, supply-side paradigm, offering 4Ps as the key marketing tools of the firm and particularly of the marketing manager. By the 1970s, there were some misgivings about this approach, and there were some attempts to replace the 4Ps with 4Cs (notably by McCarthy 19 and Lauterborn 20 ). The main suggestions are shown in Table 2 below.

The above line of thinking was clarified in the Harvard Business School’s ‘Note on marketing strategy’ 21 that described five Cs — the major areas of analysis that should be considered, before deciding on the firm’s marketing mix: customer needs, company skills, competition, collaborators and context. Another attempt made to expand the classification is known as the ‘7Cs compass model’, using McCarthy’s four Cs as the base and adding three more Cs: corporation and competitors, organization and stakeholders, plus consumers plus circumstances. 22 In parallel, one of the present authors has been teaching the subject of marketing for about 15 years with a similar 7C model: customers, competitors, channels, costs, company, constraints and contacts. 15 The value of Dolan’s 5Cs and either of the 7C models is that it gives a practicing marketing manager a checklist of items to consider before planning the traditional 4Ps or the modern marketing mix. Although the above attempts were noteworthy, in that they offered models of pre-requisites for the marketing mix, none of them represented a real adoption of a new customer-centric paradigm. It seems to the present authors that a proliferation of Ps has been replaced by a cacophony of Cs, but with no deep prior understanding to the extent to which the marketing environment has been changing.

The evolution process

Bob Dylan gave us ample warning in 1963 that, ‘the times they are a-changing’. For marketing, these changes can be summarized as follows:

People (politics and society)

Technology (analogue to digital revolution)

Media (especially the internet)

Information (spread of knowledge)

Money (economy and business)

Many of Dylan’s critical observations and songs were written about social revolution in the USA. He observed the Civil Rights movement close up and became an icon representing the youth revolution of the 1960s. The counter-cultural movement was not just about hippies, sex, drugs and rock’n’roll. It incorporated a paradigm shift: social norms, attitudes and behaviour that were previously dictated by adults became defined by succeeding younger generations. This demographic shift and social revolution demanded (and still does demand) a paradigm shift in the way marketers see their world.

And it was not just demographics — the technological environment was changing, too, as whole industries and product categories went from analogue to digital. The markets for computing, telecommunications, photography and music (among others) have been transformed. As the new virtual world (or cyberspace) has developed alongside the old familiar world of physical things, every aspect of human activity has become increasingly digitized. Functions such as record-keeping, shopping and even making friends have all taken on completely new forms. 23 The relatively recent introduction of the internet, on-line communication and social media has created completely new ways for people to communicate and interact with each other. It is younger people who have usually been among the earliest adopters of the successive innovations.

The above social and technological revolutions have had a profound effect on education, information and communication. Broadly speaking, consumers today are better-educated: they have better access to data and a better comprehension than that of their predecessors. Information about everything is available everywhere, often after just a few clicks of a smartphone. (This is not universally true — eg there is extensive censorship in the People’s Republic of China). Marketing communication traditionally meant uni-directional broadcasting. Today, that has been replaced not only by company–customer dialogue, but also by multi-directional, peer-to-peer communication through social media networks.

Finally, and in parallel to all of the above, there have been economic revolutions in the business environment. Economic prosperity and more-or-less steady growth have been replaced by geo-political and economic turbulence, unpredictability and heightened risk. The mass production-distribution-retailing-marketing paradigm is being challenged by micro-segmentation, social networking and consumer revolts. Moreover, all of the above changes have been described in merely general terms, without delving deeper into the global dimensions of change, regional differences and national nuances. Dylan was right, the times are indeed a-changing — probably in many more ways than that even he anticipated. But the questions that interest us are:

What are the implications for marketing in the twenty-first century?

Do we really have the appropriate paradigms for today’s marketing environment?

What should the marketing mix classification look like today?

Marketing in the twenty-first century

The all-encompassing and unstoppable expansion of cyberspace is changing every single dimension of consumers’ lifestyles. This information revolution has further been accelerated by the introduction of what is termed the ‘Read-Write Web’ or ‘Web 2.0’. Within this emergent virtual domain, corporate blogs, online communities, social networks and wikis have redefined the routine lives of individuals and changed the way people relate to information, brands, other people and even themselves. Marketers cannot remain indifferent to this changing business environment. They are forced to rethink the way their companies do business, develop innovative approaches to marketing and, first and foremost, gain up-to date insights into what is going on in the hearts and minds of their present and potential customers.

Recent surveys conducted on young adults, in the age group of 15–24 years, have shown that they spend about six to ten hours online everyday. They access the virtual domain for a multitude of activities, ranging from searching for information, downloading music and videos to chatting with their friends. A broad classification as to why individuals venture online can be narrowed down to the following: 24

Exploring the internet

Quest for information

Entertainment

Online shopping

As consumers spend large number of hours online, it clearly makes sense for marketing to use the online medium as a consumer touch point for product promotion and proliferation. This medium can be used to drive consumer engagement, for brand building, strengthening consumer evangelism and subsequent co-creation activities.

Leading companies are subsequently using the internet today for online marketing activities, 25 through digital tools like blogs and company-owned online communities. A corporate blog is an online webspace where companies can host organizational, brand-related, promotional or relational content to be circulated among consumers. As content on a blog starts increasing, online readership and circulation increases through inbound and outbound links from and to other websites, respectively. Consumers gradually start responding to the organizational posts by commenting and liking posts and by cross referencing on other sites. Several companies, like Dell, East West Airlines and General Motors, are using blogs for marketing.

Similarly, online communities represent virtual cliques of homogeneous groups of people who interact in a virtual environment, have similar interests and share their thoughts on a large range of topics. Social networks directed towards marketing allow consumers to engage in peer-to-peer conversations regarding product attributes, their experiences as consumers and promotional campaigns. The interesting aspect here is that companies can motivate consumers in these online communities by instituting a point system based on longevity of presence and the volume and quality of participation. Several companies, like Apple, have used these online communities to give a nudge to consumer evangelism.

Another tool that has caught the fancy of youngsters today is the ubiquitous mobile phone and especially its latest incarnation, the smartphone, which has brought digital convergence to a new level. Smartphones are used today to converse, browse the internet, send mails and for downloading mobile apps that are used for a multitude of purposes. Needless to say, marketing has risen to the need to leverage this new communication medium.

The idea itself of improving the effectiveness of marketing by allowing customers to participate in the marketing process has been recognized for at least 20 years, especially in the domain of service marketing. What is new in the twenty-first century is that consumers have the technology at their fingertips to choose as to which particular consumer experience they prefer. For the demographic segment of Millennials born in the digital age, gaining the functional benefit of using a product is simply insufficient. They increasingly demand the emotional kick of becoming engaged in innovative ways with a brand. Marketers must now understand how the latest digital tools can provide their customers with added value through their feeling of being involved in an experience shared by their peers in cyberspace. A good example of this is the Burberry Kisses marketing campaign, developed in co-operation with Google. 26 Hence, the biggest implication of marketing in the twenty-first century is recognizing the need for consumer participation.

Paradigms for contemporary marketing

Contemporary marketing has evolved with the advent of greater customer-centric marketing environments and frameworks. Companies clearly work with the consumers, identify their needs and subsequently create products based on their requirements. The entire framework of value creation, value communication and value delivery revolves around the consumer, his expectations and his relationship with the brand. The consumer relationship ladder 27 motivates organizations to convert the consumer from a mere procurer of a brand to an evangelist and subsequently a partner. It is further possible for companies to interact with and service the consumer better with the latest technological offerings. Technology has brought in analytical tools, sales force automation and provided data mining capabilities to organizations that process consumer data and synchronize their strategies based on consumer profiles, segments and expectations. The following section traces the incorporation of the following concepts in current-day marketing environments:

Relationship marketing

Customer relationship management (CRM)

Co-creation

Salesforce automation.

Digital marketing — their rise and integration with all marketing dimensions

Theories of relationship marketing 28 centre around the need for brands to invest in brand–consumer relationships. Research has proven that, as a consumer acquires knowledge about a brand or product, his relationship with the brand improves significantly. Relationship marketing focusses on moving the consumer up the brand–consumer relationship continuum from a state of engaged to a state of involved and, subsequently, a state of loyalty. This is very relevant in the present digital times. Consumers who like or comment on a brand-related post in an online domain, community or social network are presumed to be engaged with the brand. Consumers who share brand-related content or recommend the brand to others are presumed to be loyal to the brand.

Customer relationship management

CRM centres around building long-term and profitable relationships with chosen customers and getting closer to these customers with every point of contact with them. This is achieved by the formation of four types of bonds between organizations and consumers, especially using the digital medium: 29

Social bonds — Formed by peer-to-peer consumer interaction.

Financial bonds — Formed by virtue of some financial transaction or perceived financial benefit between the consumer and the organization.

Structural bonds — Formed by virtue of giving some structural access to a consumer like a login or email ID.

Relationship bonds — Formed between organizations and consumers with the aim of achieving consumer loyalty and stimulating repurchase intent.

Theories of CRM also lay emphasis on the need to identify consumers with strong relationships 30 or profit potential and the need for organizations to recognize the strategically significant consumers and to develop long-term bonds with them to ensure consumer loyalty and higher customer lifetime value.

Companies have embraced the need for change and have started involving consumers in co-creation for new product development and process improvement. Several online forums such as myStarbucks and Ideastorm by Dell have been formed with the idea of involving consumers in discussions regarding new products and services and sharing these ideas with a larger community of other participants. These organizations subsequently embrace the most popular ideas, thereby becoming increasingly customer centric.

Smart companies have embraced salesforce automation. This provides the sales force’s access to central repositories of data that can be tapped by the salesforce across larger geographical locations. This also removes problems associated with data redundancy and duplication. At the same time, the organization can provide its salesforce with access to knowledge databases and information through regularly updated dashboards. Equally significant is the ability of this system to create management information reports where sales people can regularly update significant information pertaining to the volume of potential consumers targeted, potential conversions, and sales and lead pipelines.

Digital marketing

The changing marketing landscape is evolving with the advent of:

Internet strategy integration resulting in a combination of market, policy and IT, working in a complimentary or cumulative fashion. The internet plays a key role in the integration of information across suppliers, customers and the organization.

Refined internet marketing metrics for evaluation of marketing performance and identification of key performance indicators, as a result of the campaign’s requirement.

Increase in wireless networking, resulting in a surge for demand for connected consumer electronics and substantially for better online consumer experiences. Consumer expectations about the quality of their connectivity are increasing as more and more of the devices are used for entertainment such as streaming movies or online gaming.

Rising consumer ownership of computers, mobile phones and high-tech equipment leading to creation of a vast population of internet-savvy consumers with significantly high levels of internet literacy and enthusiasm, aiming at creating significant individual internet worth. Individuals with higher individual internet worth can be successfully used as opinion leaders and consumer evangelists for effective e-marketing.

The era of big data, with the increasing volume and detail of information available online and the need to harness customer intelligence from data extracted by web crawlers. Marketing can benefit through better consumer segmentation, forecasting consumer trends and consumer analytics. Consumer profiling can help in extraction of consumer DNA, which can aid decision making in marketing.

The growth of internet marketing metrics, like length and depth of consumer online visits, time spent online, page views, referring sites and so on that aid marketers in contacting customers accordingly.

The era of e-commerce leading to online transactions in the wake of a population, constrained with time, but willing to spend, for convenience and ease of shopping. eBay (in the USA), Flipkart, Jabong and Myntra (in India) and Alibaba (in China) are some of the e-commerce companies offering the opportunity to shop online.

Influencer marketing being practiced by top brands that reach out to influencers. In the online domain, these are bloggers or social media users with a more-than-average reach among consumers, and they are prized by marketers for their ability to spread the word about products or services they believe in. According to a Technorati Media study from December 2012, 65 per cent of top US brands reported participating in influencer marketing. A similar 64 per cent of these were deemed influencers by Technorati, which implies that they had more-than-average reach in specific marketplace-made revenue from blogging, either from advertisements on their site or sponsored endorsements from brands.

Evolution of the internet. The dimensions of internet usage have changed with people using mobile devices to access the network, content available using the network and communication happening throughout the network, and technology standards that make the network possible.

Companies that manage learning relationships with customers are able to customize their offerings for them. These customers stay with the company almost forever. The consumer decision process is an intrinsic function of consumer psychology and not achieved objectively in terms of product procurement. It is the psychological gain or losses that are the behavioural drivers. This is where the collaborative web can be utilized. Organizations can focus on reducing the psychological losses and mitigating the impact of any negative consumer thought or negative product information by engaging consumers into meaningful conversations.

Digital marketing is beneficial to both marketers and customers. The benefits are traced as follows:

Digital marketing provides rich resources for buyers, sellers and learners. Opportunities range from virtual marketplaces like Amazon and eBay to a series of online directories where organizations can get their products and services listed for online transactions and auctions. These online hubs for commerce are useful in both a B2B and a B2C context, offering an incredibly wide range of products and services. The USPs of these marketplaces are quite far reaching. They range from their global reach to the increased revenue generation by virtue of enhanced consumer participation and facilities like online auctions that thrive on healthy ecosystems of sellers and affiliates.

Powerful branding and creation of a successful brand image are very important for any organization. Brands thrive on positioning and the consumer–brand relationship. Online branding offers a myriad of opportunities to enhance brand identity and brand salience and increase consumer–brand resonance. This subsequently strengthens brand loyalty.

Digital marketing presents unprecedented one-to-one communication and dynamic personalization during an online session by individualizing an impersonal, computer-networked environment; for example, a website may greet a user by his/her name or provide personalized information. Likewise, online advertising allows the customization of advertisements, including content and posted websites. For example, AdWords, Yahoo! search marketing and Google AdSense enable advertisements to be shown on relevant web pages or alongside search results.

Digital marketing allows the consumers to not only consume the content hosted online by the organization, but also to generate content. This creates numerous opportunities for marketing and advertising functions to create consumer-specific content for increasing sales and for greater revenue generation.

Digital marketing is cost-effective, specifically with reference to the ratio of cost to the reach of the target audience. Companies can reach wide audiences for a small fraction of traditional advertising budgets. The medium offers unlimited space on the web and, subsequently, marketers can present items that would not be cost-effective in print.

The internet opens up the market to new groups of customers and allows them to research and purchase products and services conveniently. The medium is not limited by geography or time, customizes powerful extranets to the company and individuals, and also allows profitable strategic business alliances and affiliations.

Internet marketers also have the advantage and ease of measuring statistics inexpensively, and almost all aspects of an internet marketing campaign can be traced, measured and tested. This is possible as online marketing initiatives usually require users to click on an advertisement, visit a website and perform a targeted action.

The immediacy of online content creation and consumption has contributed to the emerging area of interactive advertising and presents fresh challenges for advertisers who have hitherto adopted an interruptive strategy.

Digital marketing involves multiple communication vehicles and platforms. Digital marketing vehicles include email, instant messaging and podcasts. Podcasting derives from Apple’s ubiquitous iPod. With podcasting, consumers can download audio files (podcasts) or video files (vodcasts) via the internet to an iPod or another hand-held device and then listen to them or view them whenever and wherever they wish. The flexibility offered by the internet represents its potential as a mass medium, for example banner advertisements, as an addressable medium (as in case of emails) and as an interactive medium (as in the case of live chat). Platforms include PDAs, personal video recorders and cellphones.

Towards a customer-centric marketing paradigm

The study of the concepts of relationship marketing, CRM, co-creation, salesforce automation and digital marketing has led the authors to believe that, in addition to the essentially twentieth century, company-centric paradigm of the marketing mix, marketing managers would do well to adopt a twenty-firstcentury, customer-centric paradigm, and refer to it before planning the marketing mix.

As pre-requisites of the marketing mix, marketers should identify and understand the customer mix, defined as follows: The customer mix is the set of personal elements that determine the source of demand, purchasing preferences, consumption patterns and the relationships between the consumers of goods, services and experiences and their suppliers.

The ‘customer mix’ paradigm includes four key characteristics, each starting with the letter ‘P’:

Personalities

Perceptions

Participation

The twenty-first century is witnessing a new typology of customer. The contemporary customer is more empowered, internet-savvy, has greater access to information in the digital world and is being targeted by organizations in a very competitive environment. The present-day customer has a variety of choices and relies hugely on peer reviews, website information, internet searches and comparisons pertaining to product attributes and prices. Of equal importance is the ability of the customer to create content online by interacting with organizations in the public domain. It is in the interest of marketers to keep customers happy and satisfied to help create a positive word of mouth and an appropriate online reputation.

Marketing now has to deal with customers in a far more structured way through segmentation and profiling endeavours. Each customer has a specific personality, and his relationship with a particular brand becomes the predominant factor in influencing his purchase decisions. However, his individual personality traits also influence the way he interacts with a brand in this digital age. Studies on consumer segmentation have been able to generate consumer profiles, like cognizant techno-strivers, moderate digital ambivalents and techno-savvy impulsive, 31 based on individual personality traits and their ability to navigate the digital space. Further studies have generated other classifications, like flamboyant conservatives and internet moderates. Hence, intelligent marketers collect consumer-specific information and create appropriately targeted programs.

Contemporary marketing is also seeing the evolution of the consumer perception paradigm. The reason, again, is the ability of the digital age to influence and reshape consumer perceptions regarding products, brands and services. Changes in perception alter the brand–consumer relationship, issues pertaining to consumer behaviour and the future consumer repurchase intentions.

In an increasingly competitive environment, each player has to compete with several others to attract the consumer’s attention. While the digital world has seen the proliferation of numerous gadgets, methods, online tools, apps and networks, it has also seen the creation of humongous volumes of content. There is now a new problem of information overload for the customer. The answer lies in the engagement of the customer by the organizations and brands and soliciting his participation to provide emotional added value that ultimately will lead to marketing success. Coca-Cola Inc provides various good examples of this, such as the ‘Coca-Cola Village’ in Israel since 2008 and the ‘Share a Coke’ campaign that started in Australia in 2012 and has by now been expanded to over 70 countries. Not surprisingly, Coke’s arch competitor Pepsi-Cola was reported to be launching a new ‘Pepsi Challenge’ campaign in 2015, based on the idea of using social media to reach out to their target audience of Millennials and encourage customer participation in their globally shared experiences. 32

Conclusions

The above discussion regarding the evolution of the marketing mix and the importance of recognizing its pre-requisite, the customer mix, clearly emphasizes an increasing need to communicate effectively with customers and the need to invest in digital marketing communication. In the light of the above analysis, we can address the subject of IMC and trace how it has been updated to fit the needs, wants and desires of twenty-first century customers. We can digitalize its title by calling the updated version DMC 2.0 (digital marketing communication 2.0) and define it as the process of developing a dialogue with customers and facilitating conversations between customers using internet-based communication platforms. DMC 2.0 should be planned to promote customer intimacy and to encourage the customer’s participation in the process of gaining knowledge about the brand, buying the branded product/service, liking it and developing loyalty towards it.

DMC 2.0 depends on database marketing, customer intelligence and marketing analytics to aid in decision making. Customer profiling software and tools for consumer segmentation in the virtual world are fast changing the way marketing was done earlier. DMC 2.0 includes the use of social media and the development of viral marketing communication campaigns for it must be based on interactive communication between suppliers and customers and between the customers themselves. The ultimate purpose of DMC 2.0 is the same as for traditional IMC: encouraging people to buy particular products, change their attitudes towards brands or change their social habits, and it should be part of every modern marketing communication campaign.

Culliton, J. W. (1948) The Management of Marketing Costs, Harvard University Press, Boston.

Google Scholar  

Borden, N. H. (1964) ‘The concept of the marketing mix’, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 4, June, pp. 2–7.

McCarthy, E. J. (1960) Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.

Hartley, R. F. (1976) Marketing Fundamentals, 3rd edn. Dun-Donnelley, New York.

Van Waterschoot, W. and Van den Bulte, C. (1992) ‘The 4P classification of the marketing mix revisited’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, October, pp. 83–93.

Article   Google Scholar  

Dewitt, G. (1974) ‘Winning a place in the marketing mix’, Public Relations Journal, Vol. 30, August, 8, pp 20–21.

Schultz, D. E., Tannenbaum, S. J. and Lauterborn, R. F. (1993) The New Marketing Paradigm — Integrated Marketing Communication, NTC Business Books, Chicago, IL pp. 12–13.

Shapiro, B. P. (1985) ‘Rejuvenating the marketing mix’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 8–34.

Shostak, L. (1977) ‘Breaking free from product marketing’, Journal of Marketing, April, pp. 73–80.

Booms, B. H. and Bitner, M. J. (1981) ‘Marketing strategies and organizational structures for service firms’. in Donnelly, J. H. and George, W. R. (eds) Marketing of Services, American Marketing Association, Chicago.

Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L. (2012) Marketing Management, 14th edn. Pearson Education, London.

Varadarajan, P. R. and Menon, A. (1988) ‘Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 58–74.

Ries, A. and Trout, J. (1981) Positioning — The Battle for Your Mind, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York.

Hayden, J. C. (2007) Get Clients Now! American Marketing Association, AMACOM Books, New York.

Jackson, G. (2000–2015) Unpublished lecture notes.

Institute of Management Technology. (2015) ‘Global partners’ conclave’, Ghaziabad, India, 1–2 February.

Gronroos, C. (1984) ‘A service quality model and its marketing implications’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 36–44.

Friedman, M. (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to Increase its profits’, The New York Times Magazine , 13 September.

McCarthy, E. J. (1975) Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach, 5th edn. (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL, p 37.

Lauterborn, B. (1990) ‘New marketing litany: Four Ps passé: C-words take over’, Advertising Age, Vol. 62, No. 41, p 26.

Dolan, R. J. (1997) ‘Note on marketing strategy’, Harvard Business School, Teaching Note 9-598-061.

Shimizu, K. (2003) ‘Professor Koichi Shimuzu’s 7Cs Compass Model’ (in Japanese), published by Josai University Graduate School of Business Administration, Japan, available at http://www.josai.ac.jp/~shimizu/essence/Professor%20Koichi%20Shimizu's%207Cs%20Compass%20Model.html , accessed 15 January 2015.

Kissinger, H. (2014) World Order, Allen Lane, New York pp. 341–342.

Jain, N. and Ahuja, V. (2015) ‘Segmenting consumers online using K-means cluster analysis’, International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalization, Inderscience, pp. 161–178.

Lawson-Body, A. and Moez, L. (2004) ‘The impact of customer relationship management on customer loyalty: The moderating role of web site characteristics’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 6, No. 4.

Grow. (2013) Burberry Kisses-A letter to your loved one, sealed with a digital kiss, available at: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/campaigns/burberry-kisses.html , accessed 18 December 2015.

Agarwal, P. (2004) ‘The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behaviour’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 87–101.

Sheth, J. N. and Parvatiyar, A. (1995) ‘Relationship marketing in consumer markets — Antecedents and consequences’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 278–281.

Shainesh, G. and Sheth, J. N. (2009) Customer Relationship Management — A Strategic Perspective, Macmillan, London pp. 30–45.

Mithas, S., Krishnan, M. S. and Fornell, C. (2005) ‘Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction?’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 201–209.

Jain, N., Ahuja, V. and Medury, Y. (2012) ‘Internet marketing and consumers online: Identification of website attributes catering to specific consumer intents in a digital paradigm’, International Journal of Online Marketing, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 69–81.

Ember, S. and Steel, E. (2015) ‘Pepsi updates its challenge campaign for a social media generation’, International New York Times , 12 March.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Vandana Ahuja Jaypee Business School, A-10, Sector-62, Noida, 201 307, Uttar Pradesh, India

Vandana Ahuja

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vandana Ahuja .

Additional information

1 has over 40 years’ experience in the field of Marketing. He started work at IBM and Procter & Gamble in the United Kingdom and has since served as a marketing consultant for leading global companies in many industries. He currently lectures on the subject of Marketing in the international MBA programs at the University of Haifa in Israel and Tongji University in Shanghai, China.

2 has over 15 years of experience across the Corporate Sector and Academia. She is the author of Digital Marketing — A book published by Oxford University Press. She has worked with the Jaypee Group, and NIIT, India, where she was responsible for Business Development and Marketing for Corporate Training Programs. She has been actively researching the domain of the collaborative web, with focus on its contributions to the fields of Marketing and CRM and has several years of research experience. She has published several manuscripts in International and National Journals. She also serves on the Editorial Board of several International Journals and Books. At Jaypee Business School, she is Associate Professor and Area-Chair, Marketing and teaches Sales and Distribution Management, Social Media & E- Marketing, and B2B Marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Jackson, G., Ahuja, V. Dawn of the digital age and the evolution of the marketing mix. J Direct Data Digit Mark Pract 17 , 170–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2016.3

Download citation

Received : 10 December 2015

Revised : 10 December 2015

Published : 22 February 2016

Issue Date : 01 February 2016

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2016.3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • marketing mix
  • marketing planning
  • customer relationship management
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)- Concepts and Model Interpretation

Sandeep Pandey , Snigdha Gupta , Shubham Chhajed, 2021, Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) – Concepts and Model Interpretation, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY (IJERT) Volume 10, Issue 06 (June 2021)

10 Pages Posted: 23 Jul 2021

Sandeep Pandey

Wavemaker (A WPP Co.)

Snigdha Gupta

Wavemake India

Shubham Chhajed

Wavemaker India

Date Written: June 30, 2021

Marketing mix modeling has existed for decades now. Everyone has been using it, some tapped its potential with enormous success while others are yet to see its true potential. Rapidly changing marketing environment, consumer dynamics and multi touch points have made it even more complex to get it right for any industry and product. The biggest challenge in the process of any marketing mix optimization is measuring real-time cross effects and cross channel impact on business. The intent of this paper is to introduce marketing managers, consultants, analysts, strategists, and researchers to an analytics application to optimize the allocation of a firm’s marketing budget in such a way that provides the maximum likelihood of generating higher ROI. MMM uses advanced econometrics and marketing science to objectively measure the relative efficacy and effectiveness of an entire set of marketing and advertising investments, competitive steal, or initiatives to produce sales and growth in both short and long term. In this paper we discuss the methodologies used to perform such analysis, how to overcome major challenges, and the benefits that can be derived from the analysis. We also discuss opportunities for improvement in media mix models that can produce agile granular measurement for better strategy.

Keywords: Marketing mix, MMM, econometrics, higher ROI, budget allocation, agile measurement, strategy, marketing returns, marketing response

JEL Classification: C1, M3, C2, C3, C4,C5

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Wavemaker (A WPP Co.) ( email )

6th Floor, 9A , DLF Cyber City, Sector 24 Gurgaon, Haryana 122002 India

Wavemake India ( email )

Shubham chhajed (contact author), wavemaker india ( email ), do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on ssrn, paper statistics, related ejournals, quantitative marketing ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

THE IMPACT OF MARKETING MIX ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: A CASE STUDY DERIVING CONSENSUS RANKINGS FROM BENCHMARKING

research paper on marketing mix

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

risks-logo

Article Menu

research paper on marketing mix

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Author Biographies
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Integration of csr into the marketing mix for the sustainable development of companies: a view from the position of financial risk management.

research paper on marketing mix

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 2.1. financial risks and their management in companies’ activities.

  • Investment risk: the threat of the reduction of the inflow or outflow of investments, including direct foreign investments ( Karanina et al. 2023 );
  • Risk of market capitalization: threat of the reduction of market capitalization of listed companies ( Khasanov et al. 2019 );
  • Risk of the movement of shares: threat of the reduction of the movement of listed companies’ shares in the stock market ( Horvath and Yang 2024 ).

2.2. The Existing Approach to the Management of Companies’ Sustainable Development

2.3. the concept of the integration of csr into the marketing mix of companies.

  • In P1: Price—through a reduction of prices to raise the affordability of products for consumers ( Mkrtchyan et al. 2023 );
  • In P2: Product—through an increase in the quality of products, in particular, by bringing in correspondence with international quality standards, the main of which is ISO 9001 ( ISO 2024 ; Tao and Ji 2024 );
  • In P3: Place—through an increase in products’ availability for wide groups of consumers by selling them at online marketplaces ( Zhang et al. 2024 );
  • In P4: Promotion—through strengthening global brands of companies ( Farmaki et al. 2023 );
  • In P5: People—through socially-oriented HRM, for example, creation of knowledge-intensive jobs and corporate training ( Binh et al. 2023 );
  • In P6: Process—through automatization of business processes in companies’ activities ( Petrenko et al. 2019 );
  • In P7: Physical evidence—through the manifestation of corporate environmental responsibility to improve the state of the environment as physical surroundings of the production and distribution and consumer processes in the green economy ( Bogoviz et al. 2023 ; Ravichandran et al. 2023 ).

3. Materials and Methods

  • “Foreign direct investment, net inflows” (FR1) as the indicator of investment risk ( World Bank 2024b );
  • “Market capitalization of listed domestic companies” (FR2) as an indicator of the risk of market capitalization ( World Bank 2024d );
  • “Stocks traded, total value” (FR3) as an indicator of the risk of movement of shares ( World Bank 2024e ).
  • Inflation and consumer prices demonstrate the integration of CSR into P1 because it reflects the manufacturing company’s adopting responsibility for the stability of prices for manufactured and sold products in the market, which allows for reducing the risks of the reduction of the affordability of products for consumers ( Hemphill and Johnson 2020 );
  • ISO 9001 quality demonstrates the integration of CSR into P2 because it reflects voluntary standardization of quality and increased control over quality in companies’ activities, which allows reducing the risks to product quality ( Koesworodjati et al. 2024 );
  • E-participation demonstrates the integration of CSR into P3 because it reflects the establishment of agreements between companies and online marketplaces regarding convenient and profitable conditions for consumers purchasing their products, which allows for reducing the risks of reducing the affordability of products for wide groups of consumers ( Behera et al. 2024 );
  • Global brand value demonstrates the integration of CSR into P4 because it reflects the sustainability of demand for their products from progressive and environmentally responsible consumers, which allows for reducing the risks of weakening companies’ global brands ( Enslin et al. 2023 );
  • Knowledge workers demonstrate the integration of CSR into P5 because it reflects the creation of knowledge-intensive jobs by responsible employers, which allows for reducing the risks of reduction of knowledge-intensive employment ( Rubel et al. 2023 );
  • The Frontier Technologies Readiness index demonstrates the integration of CSR into P6 because it reflects employers’ responsibility to employees (which ensures minimization of personnel dismissal) and employees’ loyalty to companies, which is manifested in the maximum return from automatization in the form of growth of labor efficiency, which allows reducing social risks of automatization of business processes in companies’ activities ( Biao et al. 2023 );
  • The Green Growth Index demonstrates the integration of CSR into P7 because it reflects the implementation of green innovations and voluntary refusal of economic practices with low eco-friendliness, which allows reducing the environmental risks of companies’ activities ( Silva and Lopes 2015 ).

4.1. The Model of the Dependence of Companies’ Financial Risks on the Integration of CSR into Their Marketing Mix

4.2. the perspective of sustainable development of russian companies through fuller integration of csr into their marketing mix to reduce financial risks.

  • Investment risk—by 17,455.41%;
  • Risk of market capitalization—by 774.31%;
  • Risk of movement of shares—by 850.06%.
  • Reduction of annual inflation by 70.55%;
  • Increase in the quality of products of 4103.85%;
  • Growth of the activity of sales at online marketplaces by 68.62%;
  • Strengthening of global brands of companies by 584.02%;
  • Growth of the activity of implementing socially-oriented HRM by 83.56%;
  • Growth of the activity of the use of leading technologies by 31.56%.

4.3. System Approach to the Management of Companies’ Sustainable Development

5. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

Country NameForeign Direct Investment, Net Inflows (% of GDP)Market Capitalization of Listed Domestic Companies (% of GDP)Stocks Traded, Total Value (% of GDP)
Argentina2.448.391.26
Armenia5.111.290.01
Australia4.1499.1964.35
Austria2.1526.137.94
Azerbaijan−5.681.860.00
Bahrain4.4068.180.97
Bangladesh0.369.324.95
Belarus2.223.430.01
Botswana1.06152.420.44
Brazil3.8941.3767.30
Bulgaria3.5617.380.40
Canada2.31126.98104.06
Chile6.9394.7513.69
China1.0063.85180.72
Colombia5.0019.911.89
Costa Rica5.313.220.06
Croatia5.0127.000.34
Cyprus1.6422.330.16
Czechia3.629.911.95
Egypt, Arab Rep.2.398.152.35
Germany1.1646.2931.66
Ghana2.058.760.08
Greece3.6527.138.57
Hungary−5.7713.465.31
India1.46105.4756.64
Indonesia1.8746.2714.77
Iran, Islamic Rep.0.36390.1057.30
Israel4.3951.3621.29
Jamaica1.8676.351.07
Japan1.16126.41137.63
Jordan2.3452.275.22
Kazakhstan2.1820.300.16
Kenya0.3514.200.31
Korea, Rep.1.0898.24182.16
Kuwait0.4387.0724.25
Luxembourg−394.4762.340.06
Malaysia3.6293.6627.14
Malta26.6424.050.19
Mauritius1.9566.161.88
Mexico2.6731.007.21
Morocco1.6641.022.34
Namibia8.1816.710.28
New Zealand3.3639.325.68
Nigeria−0.0419.350.47
Oman4.7819.422.02
Pakistan0.387.662.03
Panama3.9220.420.82
Peru4.4729.390.58
Philippines2.3259.016.45
Poland5.3621.469.54
Qatar0.0370.5918.68
Romania3.829.640.81
Russian Federation−1.7823.669.04
Rwanda2.9925.880.13
Saudi Arabia2.53238.0240.37
Slovenia3.6313.600.69
South Africa2.27289.1357.76
Spain3.6346.9425.58
Sri Lanka1.2114.242.26
Switzerland−1.34223.66105.71
Tanzania1.678.840.04
Thailand2.27121.9996.52
Tunisia1.3916.751.23
Turkiye1.4436.3898.58
United Arab Emirates4.48172.2828.89
United Kingdom1.45100.2225.39
United States1.53158.41174.20
Viet Nam4.3841.6239.65
Zambia−0.2213.840.05
The arithmetic mean for the sample−3.1160.0825.96
Maximum value for the sample26.64390.10182.16
Country NameInflation, Consumer Prices (Annual %)ISO 9001 Quality/bn PPP$ GDP, Score 0–100E-Participation, Score 0–100Global Brand Value, Top 5000, % GDP, Score 0–100Knowledge Workers, Score 0–100Frontier Technologies Readiness Index, score 0–1Green Growth Index, Score 0–100Depth of Credit Information Index (0 = Low to 8 = High)
Argentina72.4314.5863.953.9634.340.5754.268.00
Armenia8.642.6456.970.0032.370.5157.078.00
Australia6.5915.1898.8327.4163.570.9058.688.00
Austria8.5518.7376.7427.2654.020.8075.437.00
Azerbaijan13.854.2937.210.0030.970.4057.188.00
Bahrain3.6317.5443.034.4119.510.5839.498.00
Bangladesh7.701.2351.161.3211.400.2848.394.00
Belarus15.2192.4541.860.0046.180.6169.377.00
Botswana11.671.0115.120.0028.780.3558.117.00
Brazil9.2812.5789.5313.0844.930.7163.458.00
Bulgaria15.33100.0073.250.0037.270.6761.505.00
Canada6.806.9982.5541.5250.720.9055.158.00
Chile11.6414.3868.6112.2733.200.6560.337.00
China1.9741.8186.0433.9766.080.7463.618.00
Colombia10.1832.6270.938.2648.050.5456.807.00
Costa Rica8.278.0954.650.0018.510.6160.717.00
Croatia10.7857.2173.250.7639.330.6863.045.00
Cyprus8.4050.9374.420.0049.670.7558.685.00
Czechia15.1065.0759.315.8345.860.7772.117.00
Egypt, Arab Rep.13.904.0833.732.0511.290.4937.748.00
Germany6.8726.8072.1056.7059.010.9275.298.00
Ghana31.261.7144.180.0023.090.3553.446.00
Greece9.6555.0260.462.6238.970.6659.267.00
Hungary14.6158.0950.013.0747.470.7467.396.00
India6.709.4258.1420.0324.430.6648.817.00
Indonesia4.215.8270.9311.488.710.4958.368.00
Iran, Islamic Rep.43.492.4516.280.1318.770.5337.358.00
Israel4.3954.6670.938.7164.940.8853.928.00
Jamaica10.353.0726.7529.3221.900.4258.998.00
Japan2.5019.34100.0057.9162.910.8863.826.00
Jordan4.2312.7153.493.1124.600.5146.268.00
Kazakhstan8.042.1580.231.1340.760.5554.298.00
Kenya7.664.6656.976.4022.660.3252.908.00
Korea, Rep.5.0918.6294.1960.9975.140.9452.598.00
Kuwait3.987.6853.4928.4916.800.6439.358.00
Luxembourg6.344.9674.4241.9370.180.8864.220.00
Malaysia3.3832.0767.4436.8333.990.7659.848.00
Malta6.1523.5375.5919.0554.310.7848.865.00
Mauritius10.7719.1740.700.0017.100.5455.997.00
Mexico7.908.1672.1017.6521.230.5860.398.00
Morocco6.669.4425.584.8220.190.5554.537.00
Namibia6.084.8123.260.0017.990.3656.137.00
New Zealand7.1711.6095.3412.7349.590.8361.898.00
Nigeria18.850.8429.071.6237.020.3246.058.00
Oman2.8110.0365.122.4716.140.5740.906.00
Pakistan19.876.3034.880.0019.000.2839.777.00
Panama2.864.8450.011.4312.800.5459.438.00
Peru8.339.8975.592.5848.380.4946.608.00
Philippines5.829.5647.6714.1238.120.6258.807.00
Poland14.4319.6563.9515.9347.650.7764.498.00
Qatar5.0010.2336.0534.1715.160.5546.528.00
Romania13.8048.6961.635.2835.630.6663.207.00
Russian Federation6.692.3859.3111.9841.820.7658.037.00
Rwanda17.691.1262.800.0012.140.2253.148.00
Saudi Arabia2.473.2968.6136.080.000.0040.778.00
Slovenia8.8356.1974.421.6460.430.7767.356.00
South Africa7.0411.5158.1430.5820.430.6152.747.00
Spain8.3942.3574.4229.9156.620.8664.657.00
Sri Lanka49.7210.8033.730.0023.360.4547.766.00
Switzerland2.8429.1769.7681.9667.080.9477.537.00
Tanzania4.351.4825.580.0011.880.2753.978.00
Thailand6.0825.1277.9126.8236.660.6462.687.00
Tunisia8.3121.6753.490.0018.540.5648.417.00
Turkiye72.318.2477.914.7139.780.6240.498.00
United Arab Emirates4.8316.2477.9144.0249.880.7450.768.00
United Kingdom7.9231.0795.3450.9967.050.8970.778.00
United States8.002.7690.7074.6176.761.0063.728.00
Viet Nam3.1614.7252.3330.3828.190.5854.868.00
Zambia10.991.0636.050.0022.820.1853.948.00
The arithmetic mean for the sample11.5819.6660.6716.0436.290.6156.277.17
Maximum value for the sample1.97100.00100.0081.9676.761.0077.538.00
  • Abdurakhmanova, Gulnora Kalandarovna, Gaibnazarov Shukhrat Gaibnazarov, Nargiza Turgunovna Shayusupuva, Dilafruz Shuxratovna Fayziyeva, and Bobir Ortikmirzaevich Tursunov. 2020. Methodical aspects of establishing a control system over compliance with principles of decent work and social security in textile enterprises. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 12: 73–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Akomea-Frimpong, I., Xiaohua Jin, and Robert Osei-Kyei. 2024. Fuzzy Analysis of Financial Risk Management Strategies for Sustainable Public–Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Ghana. Infrastructures 9: 76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Al-Ghazali, Hussam Ali Abdel-Sada, Hasan Hawraa Falyyih, and Ammar Saleem Mohammed Al-Ameri. 2024. Analysis of the Company’s Financial Performance Under the Risks of (COVID 19) a Case Study in Industrial Companies. AIP Conference Proceedings 3092: 08002. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Behera, Rajat Kumar, Nripendra P. Rana, Pradip Kumar Bala, Raed Salah Algharabat, and Kumod Kumar. 2024. Transforming customer engagement with artificial intelligence E-marketing: An E-retailer perspective in the era of retail 4.0. Marketing Intelligence and Planning . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Biao, Boris, Leila Temri, and Katherine Gundolf. 2023. Responsible Governance of Innovation and Sustainability: The Case of Digital Agriculture. Innovations 70: 87–122. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Binh, Tu Van, Linh Nguyen Khanh, Ngo Giang Thy, and Huynh Dang Khoa. 2023. CSR, marketing capabilities and human resource development: The endogenous role of network capabilities. European Journal of Training and Development 47: 695–710. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bogoviz, Aleksei V., Sergey A. Dyakov, Ekaterina N. Ilyina, and Victoria S. Ustenko. 2023. ESG Innovations of Responsible Business as a Driver of Growth of the Green Economy in Russia and Central Asia. In ESG Management of the Development of the Green Economy in Central Asia . Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 125–34. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chang, Chia-Yang, Yung-Chien Lou, and Lien-Ti Bei. 2024. Balanced or imbalanced, that is the question: The effect of R&D/marketing power structure on new product development time. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management JETM 72: 101817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cheng, Zixuan Mia, Francesca Bonetti, Anouk de Regt, Joel Lo Ribeiro, and Kirk Plangger. 2024. Principles of responsible digital implementation: Developing operational business resilience to reduce resistance to digital innovations. Organizational Dynamics 53: 101043. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Civelek, Mehmet, Aleksandr Kljucnikov, Roman Hruska, Jaroslav Svetlik, and Vladimir Vavrecka. 2024. Global Competitive Strategies: Assessing the Role of Marketing Tools in SME Internationalization and Financial Performance. Journal of Competitiveness 16: 3–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Enslin, Carla, Michelle Wolfswinkel, and Marlize Terblanche-Smit. 2023. Responsible leadership through purpose-driven brand building: Guidelines for leaders in Africa. South African Journal of Business Management 54: a3427. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Farmaki, Anna, Elias Hadjielias, Hossein Olya, Babak Taheri, and Maria Hadjielia Drotarova. 2023. CSR communication and international marketing: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Marketing Review 40: 1071–111. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Galoyan, Diana R., Firuza N. Mayilyan, Yevgenya A. Bazinyan, Manuk E. Movsisyan, and Alik A. Torosyan. 2023. Triple Exploitation of Human Capital in Developing Countries. Environmental Footprints and Eco-Design of Products and Processes 1766: 375–83. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Global Green Growth Institute. 2024. 2010–2022 Green Growth Index and Dimensions Map. Available online: https://ggindex-simtool.gggi.org/ (accessed on 28 July 2024).
  • Hanandeh, Ahmad, Ayman Mansour, Sakher Najdawi, Omar Kanaan, Ghaith Abualfalayeh, and Kilani Qais. 2024. The effect of the comprehensive quality management strategies on environmentally responsible activities and the performance of the organizations. Uncertain Supply Chain Management 12: 1379–90. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hemphill, Thomas A., and Scott D. Johnson. 2020. Premium-priced, branded generic pharmaceuticals in emerging economies: A socially responsible consumer pricing strategy? Business and Professional Ethics Journal 39: 287–317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Horvath, Jaroslav, and Guanyi Yang. 2024. Global Financial Risk, Equity Returns and Economic Activity in Emerging Countries. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 86: 672–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Huynh, Anh-Tuan, Adriana Knápková, Tat-Dat Bui, and Tran-Thai-Ha Nguyen. 2024. The impact of institutional pressures on corporate social responsibility and green marketing adoption: An empirical approach in Vietnam banking industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing 42: 620–41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Iandolo, Francesca, Antonio La Sala, Lorenzo Turriziani, and Francesco Caputo. 2024. Stakeholder engagement in managing systemic risk management. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • ISO. 2024. Quality Management Systems—Requirements Amendment 1: Climate Action Changes . ISO 9001:2015/Amd 1:2024. Geneva: ISO. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kadesnikova, Oksana V., Sergey A. Kadesnikov, Rezeda R. Safina, Olga A. Kireyeva, and Rasul O. Kholbekov. 2023. Russian Practice of Ensuring the Economic Security of Production Enterprise on the Basis of Corporate Accounting System. Studies in Big Data 124: 133–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Karanina, Elena V., Natalia V. Lazareva, Svetlana M. Perevozchikova, and Anastasia I. Smetanina. 2023. Foreign direct investments as a prospective strategy of business integration in the digital economy. Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing 27: 267–76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Karim, Sitara, Brian M. Lucey, Muhammad A. Naeem, and Larisa Yarovaya. 2024. Extreme risk dependence between green bonds and financial markets. European Financial Management 30: 935–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Khasanov, Bakhodir Akramovich, Bakhodir Akramovich Khasanov, Zafar Avazmuratovich Mukumov, Abdimumin Ismatovich Alikulov, Ayjan Baxtiyarovna Djumanova, Uktam Toshtemirovich Eshboev, and Risolat Bahodirovna Hasanova. 2019. Calculation of the invested capital profitability in the financial condition analysis process. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 28: 42–48. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Koesworodjati, Yudhi, Ratu Hedy Syahidah Budiarti, and Popo Suryana. 2024. Analysis of Marketing Capabilities, Relational Marketing, And Company Capabilities in Affecting Customer Retention Consumer Financing Products. Quality Access to Success 25: 338–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kumar, K. Laveen, and S. Anjani Devi. 2024. Beyond Likes and Shares: Unveiling the Sequential Mediation of Brand Equity, Loyalty, Image, and Awareness in Social Media Marketing’s Influence on Repurchase Intentions for High-Tech Products. Qubahan Academic Journal 4: 23–37. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lin, Chieh-Peng, Her-Ting Huang, and Tse Yao Huang. 2020. The effects of responsible leadership and knowledge sharing on job performance among knowledge workers. Personnel Review 49: 1879–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ma, Jiali, Shushang Zhu, and Duan Li. 2024. Measuring Financial Systemic Risk: Net Liability Clearing Mechanism and Contagion. Effect Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 37: 1114–46. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mkrtchyan, Tatul, Yevgenya Bazinyan, Narek Karapetyan, Hayk Sargsyan, and Narine Petrosyan. 2023. Overreactive to international markets? Pricing mechanisms and value chains in a vegetable oil market. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences 5: 601–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Musallam, Sami R. M. 2024. The effect of the board of directors on financial performance and the existence of risk management as an intervening variable. Journal of Islamic Marketing 15: 1097–114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Oduro, Stephen, and Leul Girma Haylemariam. 2019. Market orientation, CSR and financial and marketing performance in manufacturing firms in Ghana and Ethiopia. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 10: 398–426. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Panchenko, Volodymyr, Iryna Biletska, Natalia Basii, Mariana Kohut, Taras Vasyltsiv, and Olha Mulska. 2024. Competitiveness vs business financial resource opportunities: Innovation marketing strategies. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice 2: 502–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Petrenko, Elena S., Stanislav Benčič, and Anna A. Koroleva. 2019. Digital business in the cyber economy: The organization of production and distribution based on the breakthrough technologies of Industry 4.0. Contributions to Economics Part F 2: 11–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Przhedetsky, Yu V., Nataliya Vitovna Przhedetskaya, V. Y. Przhedetskaya, Viktoria Andreevna Bondarenko, and K. V. Borzenko. 2018. The role of social-ethical marketing and information and communication technologies in response to challenges of oncology. European Research Studies Journal 21: 377–86. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ravichandran, Jagathiswary, Choi-Meng Leong, Tze-Yin Lim, Eva Lim, and Lee-Yen Chaw. 2023. Green marketing strategies and CSR: Are they relevant to consumer willingness to purchase green products? In Entrepreneurship and Green Finance Practices: Avenues for Sustainable Business Start-ups in Asia . Leeds: Emerald, pp. 219–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rodríguez Ron, Andrés Santiago. 2024. Corporate social responsibility and sustainable marketing: A path towards sustainable development. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia 29: 1059–71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Rubel, Mohammad Rabiul Basher, Daisy Mui-Hung Kee, Mohd Yusoff Yusliza, and Nadia Newaz Rimi. 2023. Socially responsible HRM and hotel employees’ environmental performance: The mediating roles of green knowledge sharing and environmental commitment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 35: 2645–64. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Saleem, Adil, Ahmad Daragmeh, R. M. Ammar Zahid, and Judit Sági. 2024. Financial intermediation through risk sharing vs non-risk sharing contracts, role of credit risk, and sustainable production: Evidence from leading countries in Islamic finance. Environment, Development and Sustainability 26: 11311–41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Samieva, Kanikei T., Irina I. Saenko, Vera I. Menshchikova, and Anton S. Smetanin. 2023. ESG Management of Digital Business Using Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Support of the Green Economy in Russia and Central Asia. Environmental Footprints and Eco-Design of Products and Processes Part F 1766: 3–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shevyakova, Anna, and Elena Petrenko. 2018. Threats to the security of a country: Revealing negative trends in the development of human capital. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 8: 155–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Silva, Anaites Maria de Moraes, and Wilza Gomes Reis Lopes. 2015. Responsible consumption and the virtuous circle of the green marketing. Espacios 36: 17. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Spielmann, Nathalie, Christopher Williams, and Ajay K. Kohli. 2023. Local Roots and Global Responsibility: Terroir Brands and Their Responsible Engagement. Journal of International Marketing . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tao, Weiting, and Yi Grace Ji. 2024. Firm-Determined or Consumer-Determined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)? Examining the Effects of Choice-of-Cause in Cause-Related Marketing. International Journal of Business Communication 61: 263–86. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • UNCTAD. 2024. Technology and Innovation Report 2023. Available online: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tir2023_en.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  • WIPO. 2024. Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty. Available online: https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2023/ (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  • World Bank. 2024a. Depth of Credit Information Index (0 = Low to 8 = High). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.CRD.INFO.XQ?view=chart (accessed on 14 May 2024).
  • World Bank. 2024b. Foreign Direct Investment, Net Inflows (% of GDP). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?view=chart (accessed on 14 May 2024).
  • World Bank. 2024c. Inflation, Consumer Prices (Annual %). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG?view=chart (accessed on 14 May 2024).
  • World Bank. 2024d. Market Capitalization of Listed Domestic Companies (% of GDP). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/CM.MKT.LCAP.GD.ZS?view=chart (accessed on 14 May 2024).
  • World Bank. 2024e. Stocks Traded, Total Value (% of GDP). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/CM.MKT.TRAD.GD.ZS?view=chart (accessed on 14 May 2024).
  • Yim, Sean, Young Han Bae, Hyunwoo Lim, and JaeHwan Kwon. 2019. The role of marketing capability in linking CSR to corporate financial performance: When CSR gives positive signals to stakeholders. European Journal of Marketing 53: 1333–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zarova, Elena, and Bobir Tursunov. 2022. Methodology for assessing the financial security of enterprises in the post-pandemic period of digital economy. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2022: 110–15. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhang, Jiemei, Bingxin Tang, Bei Lyu, and Zhaoran Song. 2024. The impact of marketing appeals on consumer willingness to participate in virtual CSR co-creation. Marketing Intelligence and Planning . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ziaei, Maryam, Mariam Ameli, Morteza Rasti-Barzoki, and Ali Shavandi. 2024. A game-theoretic approach for pricing in a dual-channel socially responsible closed-loop supply chain under reward-penalty mechanism. Environment, Development and Sustainability . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Element of the MethodologyApplication of the Methodology to This PaperTool for Collecting DataUnits of Measuring VariablesScale for Measuring Variables
Low Values (Less Than 75% of the Average Value)At the Level of Average Values (between 75% and 125% of the Average Value)High (above 125% of the Average and Maximum Values)
Type of researchEmpirical research-----
Sample69 countries-----
VariableResultingDepth of credit information index ( )score 0 = low to 8 = highless than 5.38between 5.38 and 7.17 *between 7.17 and 8.00
Variables of financial risksForeign direct investment, net inflows ( )% of GDPless than −2.33between −2.33 and −0.78between −0.78 and 26.64
Market capitalization of listed domestic companies ( )% of GDPless than 45.06between 45.06 and 75.10between 75.10 and 390.10
Stocks traded, total value ( )% of GDPless than 19.47between 19.47 and 32.45 between 32.45 and 182.16
Variables of social risksInflation, consumer prices (annual %) ( )annual %less than 1.97between 1.97 and 8.69between 8.69 and 11.58
ISO 9001 quality/bn PPP$ GDP ( )score 0–100less than 14.75between 14.75 and 24.58between 24.58 and 100.00
E-participation ( )score 0–100less than 45.50between 45.50 and 75.84between 75.84 and 100.00
Global brand value, top 5000, % of GDP ( )score 0–100less than 12.03between 12.03 and 20.05between 20.05 and 81.96
Knowledge workers ( )score 0–100less than 27.22between 27.22 and 45.36between 45.36 and 76.76
Frontier technologies readiness index ( )score 0–1less than 0.46between 0.46 and 0.76between 0.76 and 1.00
Green growth index, score 0–100 ( )score 0–100less than 42.20between 42.20 and 70.34between 70.34 and 77.53
Element of 7PThe Logic of the Integration of CSR into Each Element of the Marketing mixIndicator for Measuring the Integration of CSR into the Element of 7PSourceThe Symbol for the Indicators
P1PriceReduction of pricesInflation, consumer prices (annual %) ( )P1
P2ProductIncrease in the quality of productsISO 9001 quality/bn PPP$ GDP ( )P2
P3PlaceIncrease in affordability of products for purchasingE-participation ( )P3
P4PromotionStrengthening of global brands of companiesGlobal brand value, top 5000, % of GDP ( )P4
P5PeopleSocially-oriented HRMKnowledge workers ( )P5
P6ProcessAutomatization of business processesFrontier technologies readiness index ( )P6
P7Physical evidenceManifestation of corporate environmental responsibilityGreen growth index, score 0–100 ( )P7
Regression Statistics
Multiple R0.7524
R-square0.5660
Adjusted R-square0.5082
Standard error33.6285
Observations69
ANOVA
dfSSMSFSignificance F
Regression888,507.117011,063.38969.78301.42 × 10
Residual6067,852.68341130.8781
Total68156,359.8004
CoefficientsStandard errort-Statp-ValueLower 95%Upper 95%
Y-intercept−190.327440.5222−4.69690.0000−271.3839−109.2709
P −0.02290.3346−0.06840.9457−0.69210.6464
P 0.71150.23892.97860.00420.23371.1894
P 0.25030.27510.90980.3666−0.30000.8005
P −0.25290.2901−0.87180.3868−0.83330.3274
P −0.62880.3855−1.63100.1081−1.39990.1423
P 4.05586.70310.60510.5474−9.352417.4641
P −0.13700.5905−0.23200.8173−1.31811.0441
F26.50023.29578.04094.2 × 10 19.907833.0926
Regression Statistics
Multiple R0.6354
R-square0.4037
Adjusted R-square0.3242
Standard error58.7010
Observations69
ANOVA
DfSSMSFSignificance F
Regression8139,961.030417,495.12885.07727.63 × 10
Residual60206,748.28473445.8047
Total68346,709.3152
CoefficientsStandard errort-Statp-ValueLower 95%Upper 95%
Y-intercept155.510170.73442.19850.031814.0203296.9999
P 0.54530.58400.93370.3542−0.62291.7135
P 0.30060.41700.72090.4738−0.53351.1347
P −0.58490.4802−1.21800.2280−1.54540.3757
P 2.87540.50655.67754.2 × 10 1.86243.8885
P −0.61460.6729−0.91330.3647−1.96060.7315
P 7.082211.70080.60530.5473−16.322930.4872
P −2.06891.0307−2.00730.0492−4.1306−0.0072
F2.16995.75290.37720.7074−9.337613.6773
Regression Statistics
Multiple R0.7778
R-square0.6050
Adjusted R-square0.5523
Standard error30.0971
Observations69
ANOVA
dfSSMSFSignificance F
Regression883,229.402010,403.675211.48521.02 × 10
Residual6054,350.0583905.8343
Total68137,579.4603
CoefficientsStandard errort-Statp-ValueLower 95%Upper 95%
Y-intercept−16.476536.2668−0.45430.6512−89.021056.0679
P 0.42620.29941.42340.1598−0.17281.0252
P 0.08060.21380.37680.7076−0.34710.5082
P 0.32650.24621.32600.1899−0.16600.8190
P 1.39040.25975.35431.4E−060.87091.9098
P 0.51160.34501.48270.1434−0.17861.2017
P −1.06855.9992−0.17810.8592−13.068710.9317
P −1.15490.5285−2.18530.0328−2.2119−0.0978
F5.71072.94961.93610.0576−0.189411.6107
Criteria of ComparisonExisting ApproachNew (System) Approach
Type of sustainable development managementCorporate managementMarketing management
Connection of social and financial risks managementIsolated, independent (separate) spheres of managementImplemented in a systemic manner
Essence of managementIntegration of CSR into P5 “People”Disclosure of credit informationIntegration of CSR into the marketing mix (except for P7: Physical evidence)
Target result of managementReduction of social risksReduction of financial risksReduction of social and financial risks
Element of 7PConsequences of the Integration of CSR into the Element of the Marketing Mix for Financial Risks to Companies
Suggested in the Existing LiteratureFactual, Established in This Paper (b )
For Investment RiskFor risk of Market CapitalizationFor Risk of Movement of Shares
P1Price ( )−0.020.550.43
P2Product ( )0.710.300.08
P3Place ( )0.25−0.580.33
P4Promotion ( )−0.252.881.39
P5People ( )−0.63−0.610.51
P6Process ( )4.067.08−1.07
P7Physical evidence ( ), ( )−0.14−2.07−1.15
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Kucharov, A.S.; Sozinova, A.A.; Popkova, E.G.; Fomenko, N.M.; Vorontsova, G.V.; Ostrovskaya, V.N. Integration of CSR into the Marketing Mix for the Sustainable Development of Companies: A View from the Position of Financial Risk Management. Risks 2024 , 12 , 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12080121

Kucharov AS, Sozinova AA, Popkova EG, Fomenko NM, Vorontsova GV, Ostrovskaya VN. Integration of CSR into the Marketing Mix for the Sustainable Development of Companies: A View from the Position of Financial Risk Management. Risks . 2024; 12(8):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12080121

Kucharov, Abrorjon S., Anastasia A. Sozinova, Elena G. Popkova, Natalia M. Fomenko, Galina V. Vorontsova, and Victoria N. Ostrovskaya. 2024. "Integration of CSR into the Marketing Mix for the Sustainable Development of Companies: A View from the Position of Financial Risk Management" Risks 12, no. 8: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12080121

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Keynote paper From marketing mix to relationship marketing

    research paper on marketing mix

  2. ⚡ Marketing mix paper. Sample Research Paper on Marketing Mix Case

    research paper on marketing mix

  3. Samsung Marketing Mix (4Ps) Analysis

    research paper on marketing mix

  4. How to Develop a Successful Marketing Mix Strategy [+ Templates

    research paper on marketing mix

  5. 🎉 Marketing mix essay. The 7 P’s of Marketing Mix Essay Example for

    research paper on marketing mix

  6. FREE 46+ Research Paper Examples & Templates in PDF, MS Word

    research paper on marketing mix

VIDEO

  1. Marketing project on Perfume (Marketing Mix) Class 12 #class12 #project #cbse @creationsby._.k

  2. HSC Marketing।।Chapter-7 ।Part-1। HSC Marketing 1st Paper|| মান ব্যবস্থাপনা

  3. Class 10 Marketing & Sales CBSE Sample Paper 2022 -23 section B

  4. Mastering Marketing Management: Your Complete Guide Part 1

  5. HSC Marketing।।Chapter-5 ।Part-1। HSC Marketing 1st Paper|| উৎপাদন ব্যবস্থাপনা

  6. Class 10 Marketing & Sales CBSE Sample Paper 2023-24 Section B

COMMENTS

  1. (PDF) THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF THE MARKETING MIX: A ...

    This is a theoretical paper about managerial marketing variables that describe new. dimensions of the marketing mix. The paper discusses the current 4P's model of marketing and. its variables ...

  2. (PDF) Marketing Mix

    termed, the marketing mix, to wit; product, place, price, and promotion (365 Careers, 2017). measure of performance in each element. Colloquially, product, the first "P" or marketing r efers ...

  3. A global perspective on the marketing mix across time and space

    1. Introduction. According to the American Marketing Association (AMA), the marketing mix (MM) "refers to the combination of controllable marketing variables that the firm uses to pursue the desired level of sales in the target market" (MASB 2021).As such, it is part of, and informed by, the firm's marketing strategy (Varadarajan 2010, p. 120) and implemented by means of concrete actions ...

  4. The Evaluation of Marketing Mix Elements: A Case Study

    the most important elements to increase the customer satisfaction (95.4%) and (93%) respectively. The promotion of product has a very good level to increase sells in the company (80.6% - 85%). The ...

  5. The Impact of Marketing Mix on the Competitive Advantage of the SME

    According to the data analysis, the results show that all of marketing mix elements (product, price, place, and promotion) have a significant impact on achieving competitive advantage in the case of Al Buraimi's SMEs (p value for all marketing mix elements is less than α = .05). The most effective element when it comes to achieving ...

  6. PDF The Effect of Marketing Mix Strategy on customer satisfaction

    marketing practitioners, noticing that ‗‗. . . Marketing in practice has, to a large extent, been turned into managing this toolbox . . . '', a point shared by Goldsmith who argues that the ‗‗. . . time-honored concept of the 4Ps—the Marketing Mix . . . '' is the heart of the contemporary marketing management

  7. Marketing Mix for Next Generation Marketing

    The proportions in the marketing mix can be altered and differed from the product to product (Hodder Education, n.d). The marketing mix management paradigm has dominated marketing thought, research and practice (Grönroos, 1994), and “as a creator of differentiation†(Van Waterschoot, n.d) since it was introduced in 1940s.

  8. PDF 9.1 Introduction to the Marketing Mix

    It involves the 7Ps in Fig. 9.1; product, price, place and promotion (McCarthy, 1960) and an additional three elements that help us meet the challenges of marketing services, people, process and physical evidence (Booms & Bitner, 1981). Figure 9.2 depicts the categories of the marketing mix and describes each cate-gory in detail.

  9. Dawn of the digital age and the evolution of the marketing mix

    This paper traces the journey of the marketing mix paradigm from its inception through continuous debate and discussion over the years. It traces the evolution of marketing mix components and the transformation of the marketing paradigm as society, technology, media, information and money have changed. A significant evolution of technology has changed the face of marketing. The paper uses ...

  10. The Impact of Marketing Mix on Customer Satisfaction:

    Purpose - This paper takes a cautionary stance to the impact of marketing mix on customer satisfaction, via a case study deriving. consensus rankings for benchmarking on selected retail stores in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach - ELECTRE I model is used in deriving consensus rankings via multicriteria decision making.

  11. The Evaluation of Marketing Mix Elements: A Case Study

    Abstract. The paper aims to investigate the influencing of marketing mix (MM) elements (product, price, place or distribution, and promotion) on increasing the effectiveness of product promotion and their role to reduce the problems within the organization. The main important aspects of this paper are to discuss the theoretical part of MM, to ...

  12. PDF The Impact of Marketing Mix and Customer Value on Customer Loyalty

    MPRA Paper No. 104683, posted 14 Dec 2020 07:32 UTC. The Impact of Marketing Mix and Customer Value on Customer Loyalty A Research Report submitted By Abdul Mannan Khan (6305) Mirza Wajahat Baig (6332) Muzzamil Ahmed (6638) ... marketing mix is introduced by McCarthy (1971) he defines marketing mix is the mixture of four ...

  13. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING MIX ON ORGANIZATIONS PERFORMANCE

    The paper undertakes an extensive literature review from the past studies related to the concept of marketing mix and descriptive analysis is used to analyse the best practice among the 7ps of ...

  14. PDF A Review of Marketing Mix: 4Ps or More?

    He regrouped Borden's 12 elements to four elements or 4Ps, namely product, price, promotion and place at a marketing manger's command to satisfy the target market. Especially in 1980s onward, number of researchers proposes new 'P' into the marketing mix. Judd (1987) proposes a fifth P (people). Booms and Bitner (1980) add 3 Ps ...

  15. PDF Effects of Marketing Mix on Sales Performance: a Case of Unga Feeds

    A Research Project Submitted to the Chandaria School of Business in ... Marketing mix can also be used to develop long term and short term goals. According to Kiprotich (2012), marketing mix is a set of marketing tools that organizations blend to get the response it wants from its target market. Marketing mix is grouped into four variables

  16. Neuromarketing Tools Used in the Marketing Mix: A Systematic Literature

    To this end, this paper has followed the instructions of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol of Moher et al. (2015) to extract the original and review articles in neuromarketing research that used neuromarketing methods in the marketing mix (e.g., advertising, product, price, and brand) to ...

  17. Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)- Concepts and Model Interpretation

    A paper that introduces marketing mix modeling (MMM), an analytics application to optimize marketing budget allocation and measure its impact on sales and growth. It discusses the methodologies, challenges, benefits and opportunities of MMM for different industries and products.

  18. (Pdf) the Impact of Marketing Mix on Customer Satisfaction: a Case

    Article arises research questions is marketing mix create added value for enterprises. There are used scientific literature and analysis methods in article. ... This is a theoretical paper about managerial marketing variables that describe new dimensions of the marketing mix. The paper discusses the current 4P's model of marketing and its ...

  19. (PDF) The Impact of Marketing Mix on Customer ...

    PDF | On Jan 1, 2007, Amy Poh Ai Ling published The Impact of Marketing Mix on Customer Satisfaction: A Case Study Deriving Consensus Rankings from Benchmarking | Find, read and cite all the ...

  20. PDF MARKETING MIX MODELING

    To ensure a successful Marketing Mix Model project, every project must begin with a checklist of business questions, which will keep you focused on your goals and make sure your project is answering the right questions. You can see a sample checklist at the end of this paper. The four phases of a Marketing Mix Modeling project are: 1.

  21. Integration of CSR into the Marketing Mix for the Sustainable

    This paper is devoted to establishing the consequences of integrating CSR into the marketing mix for financial risks in modern companies. Based on the international statistics for 2023, we compiled a regression model of the dependence of financial risks on the integration of CSR into their marketing mix. Based on that, we developed a new system approach to managing companies' sustainable ...

  22. (PDF) IMPACT OF MARKETING MIX ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTIONS

    Marketing Mix: According t o Kotler (2005) marketing mix is the set of co ntrollable tactical marketing tools-product, price, place and promotion-that th e firm blends to produce the

  23. PDF Marketing Mix in FMCG's leading Companies: Four Ps Analysis

    FMCG companies employ marketing mix strategies. Marketing mix strategies aim to establish products' loyalty and make it possible for the companies to charge higher prices. Mostly, FMCG Company carries out its marketing task by making a market offer (Ramaswamy & Namakumari, 2013). First, the company creates a product that will meet the needs

  24. (PDF) Analyzing and Exploring the Effectiveness of Each ...

    The primary aim of the research paper is to study the effects of service marketing mix elements on Indian customer for making the appropriate marketing mix strategy which reveals that in service ...